Physics Flashcards

lockinskeep

1
Q

The isospin and strangeness, along with three free parameters, determine this quantity for hadrons in a formula developed by Okubo and Gell-Mann

A

Mass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When this quantity equals zero, the Dirac equation reduces to the Weyl [vile] equation

A

Mass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A Millennium Prize problem involves determining whether Yang-Mills theory has a “gap” in this quantity

A

Mass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The Komar form of this quantity can be defined for stationary spacetimes

A

Mass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The weak equivalence principle relates this quantity’s active, passive, and inertial forms

A

Mass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The Friedmann equations assume that this property produces curvature as the sole contributor to the stress-energy tensor

A

Mass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

An imaginary value of this quantity is possessed by a Tachyonic field

A

Mass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A Kibble balance was used in 2019 to redefine this quantity’s SI unit exactly in terms of the Planck constant

A

Mass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The presence of binding energy causes atomic nuclei to have a namesake “defect” in this quantity compared to their constituent particles

A

Mass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The “seesaw mechanism” might explain a nonzero value of this quantity in certain fermions

A

Mass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The constant product of two eigenvalues is used to explain a property of these particles in the seesaw mechanism

A

Neutrinos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A form of double beta decay that does not emit these particles would imply that they are their own antiparticles

A

Neutrinos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Only one-third the expected solar flux of these particles was observed due to their flavor oscillations, which were predicted by Bruno Pontecorvo

A

Neutrions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Water tanks with Cherenkov [chuh-REN-koff] detectors are used to find these particles in Super-Kamiokande [KAH-mee-oh-KAHN-day]

A

Neutrinos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Observing photomultiplier tubes trained on some water near a nuclear reactor determined these particles’ existence in the Cowan-Reines experiment

A

Neutrinos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

DUMAND, an early detector of these particles located off of the coast of Hawaii, was a precursor to a detector of this particle that consists of thousands of Digital Optical Modules located thousands of meters below Antarctic ice

A

Neutrinos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

These particles are thought to be CPT-invariant, which would mean they are their own antiparticles and make them the only Majorana fermions in the Standard Model

A

Neutrinos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

The IceCube experiment has sought to detect hypothetical examples of these particles that only interact with gravity, termed “sterile” ones

A

Neutrinos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

This quantity is raised to the negative fourth power in the definition of Einstein’s gravitational constant

A

speed of light

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

The slope of a 45 degree line on a Minkowski diagram equals this quantity because Minkowski time is scaled by this quantity

A

speed of light

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

By comparing interference patterns, this quantity was found not to depend on the direction of measurement in the Michelson-Morley experiment

A

speed of light

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

In 1957, Robert Dicke proposed that this quantity has a small correction term inversely proportional to the distance to a star

A

speed of light

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

A toothed rotating cogwheel is used to measure this quantity in the Fizeau experiment

A

speed of light

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

This quantity and big G are set equal to one in geometrized units

A

speed of light

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

“One-way” measurements of this quantity are assumed to agree with “two-way” ones according to a common synchronization convention

A

speed of light

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

This quantity does not depend on a similar quantity of a Kennedy–Thorndike apparatus

A

speed of light

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Wick rotating this quantity yields a Euclidean metric when it is assigned “minus” in the signature

A

time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

An invariant hyperbola whose major axis is vertical has intervals “like” this quantity

A

time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Einstein developed a standard for devices that measure this quantity so that they always give the same one-way speed of light

A

time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Muons reach Earth without decaying because they experience a decrease in this quantity in the atmosphere

A

time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Frank Wilczek theorized systems named for this variable that break a symmetry related to this variable

A

time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Physical laws are invariant under charge conjugation, parity transformation, and reversal of this variable

A

time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Replacing a vector quantity in this law with the gradient of a scalar gives Poisson’s equation

A

Gauss’s Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

One formulation of this law gives rho-free in terms of the divergence of the D-field

A

Gauss’s Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Using this law, one can derive the formula “sigma over epsilon-nought” for an infinite sheet of charge by constructing a “pillbox”

A

Gauss’s Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

This statement generalized for gravity states that the divergence of a gravitational field equals negative 4 pi times big G times density, a law which reduces to Poisson’s equation

A

Gauss’s Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

This law, which equates the surface integral of E dot dS with Q over the permittivity of free space, is the first of Maxwell’s equations

A

Gauss’s Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

A paradox associated with this law is exemplified by the rocking plates experiment, and explained microscopically using the radial component of the Lorentz force

A

Faraday’s Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

This law is derived by taking the circulation of Lorentz’s law

A

Faraday’s Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Lenz’s law adds a negative sign to this law, which relates rate of change in magnetic flux to the EMF on a conductive loop

A

Faraday’s Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

This law can be derived by taking a closed line integral of the Lorentz force

A

Faraday’s Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Substituting this law into the expression for work done by a particle in a betatron is used to derive the betatron condition

A

Faraday’s Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Substituting this law into the expression for work done by a particle in a betatron is used to derive the betatron condition

A

Faraday’s Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

A duality of the U(1) (you-won) phase factor was used by Hiroyasu Kozumi to relate this law’s predictions to that of a microscopic result, which Richard Feynman had noted were uniquely “two quite separate phenomena”

A

Faraday’s Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

This law can be derived by taking a closed line integral of the Lorentz force

A

Faraday’s Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

A paradox involving this law is resolved using motion relative to a return path in a laboratory frame in which two brushes are fixed on the rim of a spinning disc

A

Faraday’s Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Rather than friction, high-speed trains often use brakes exploiting a form of drag resulting from this law, which gives rise to eddy currents

A

Faraday’s Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

In the only decay mode used to identify the Higgs boson that doesn’t involve the W or Z bosons, the Higgs decays into two of these particles

A

photons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

The propagation of one of these particles forms virtual particle-antiparticle pairs which contribute to vacuum polarization

A

photons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

The formulae for cross sections of the scattering between these bosons and other particles often have a term containing the fine structure constant times h-bar over m-sub-e times c

A

photons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

If the energy of one of these particles exceeds 1.022 MeV (“Mega electron volts”), it can cause pair production

A

photons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

These particles are represented by wavy lines in Feynman diagrams

A

photons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

The startup PsiQuantum is attempting to utilize these particles to create fault-tolerant qubits

A

photons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

Researchers at USTC are attempting to implement boson (“boh-zawn”) sampling with these particles to prove quantum supremacy

A

photons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

Wheeler’s delayed-choice experiment tests if one of these particles “chooses” how to act in the presence of an experimental apparatus

A

photons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

A single one of these particles becomes a pair of them in spontaneous parametric down- conversion

A

photons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

Future actions seemingly affect past events in an experiment traditionally performed with these particles, the delayed choice quantum eraser

A

photons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

These particles can be emitted from a nucleus without causing an impact on its source in “recoil-free emission” due to the Mössbauer effect

A

photons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

Spontaneous parametric down-conversion splits a “pump” one of these particles into two of these particles that are entangled with perpendicular polarization

A

photons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
60
Q

These particles are observed in interferometer experiments

A

photons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
61
Q

This quantity is related to the number of particles times mean polarizability by the Lorentz-Lorenz equation

A

index of refraction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
62
Q

This quantity can be negative in left-handed metamaterials, as proposed by Victor Veselago

A

index of refraction

63
Q

This quantity equals the square root of one plus the electric susceptibility by the Ewald–Oseen extinction theorem

A

index of refraction

64
Q

An empirical formula for this quantity is a power series in “one over lambda squared” which is generalised by the Sellmeier equation

A

index of refraction

65
Q

The Persian mathematician Ibn Sahl was the first to describe a law concerning this quantity

A

index of refraction

66
Q

Rasmus Bartholin [bar-TOLE-in] observed this quantity’s double form in calcite

A

index of refraction

67
Q

Radiation pressure causes a runaway increase in this quantity for small astronomical bodies according to the YORP effect

A

angular momentum

68
Q

In the Kepler problem, the centrifugal term of the effective potential is proportional to the square of this quantity, a fact which is derived by using this quantity to eliminate the rotational velocity in the expression for the total energy

A

angular momentum

69
Q

Eigenfunctions (“EYE-gen-functions”) of an operator corresponding to the square of this quantity produce spherical harmonics

A

angular momentum

70
Q

Momentum is crossed with this quantity in the expression for the LRL vector

A

angular momentum

71
Q

The conservation of this quantity is implied by the areal (“air-ee-UL”) velocity being constant according to Kepler’s second law

A

angular momentum

72
Q

This quantity divided by mass gives the Kerr parameter in the Kerr metric, which describes black holes for which this quantity is nonzero

A

angular momentum

73
Q

A system with a rotationally symmetric Lagrangian conserves this quantity per Noether’s (“NUR-tuhʼs”) theorem

A

angular momentum

74
Q

Negative values of this quantity for Earth’s atmosphere tend to correspond to La Niña events

A

angular momentum

75
Q

This quantity is quantised so must be equal to a half integer multiple of the reduced Planck’s constant

A

angular momentum

76
Q

David Bohm rediscovered and extended this physicist’s work on a hidden variable theory of quantum mechanics called pilot-wave theory

A

Louis de Broglie

77
Q

Bose gases will only obey Bose-Einstein statistics when a quantity named for this physicist is less than or equal to the cube root of the volume of the gas over the number of gas particles

A

Louis de Broglie

78
Q

This man proposed that a particle’s momentum is equal to Planck’s constant divided by a wavelength named for him

A

Louis de Broglie

79
Q

A molecular gas is classical if this quantity is much less than the cube root of inverse particle density

A

de Broglie wavelength

80
Q

Entropy minus five-halves is proportional to the negative logarithm of this quantity cubed times N over V in the Sackur–Tetrode equation

A

de Broglie wavelength

81
Q

Goldstone bosons have a value of zero for these two quantities

A

spin, mass

82
Q

This mechanism is related to a “Mexican hat” potential energy curve that resembles a sombrero

A

Higgs mechanism

83
Q

For a massless field, this quantity times helicity gives the Pauli–Lubanski pseudovector

A

(linear) momentum

84
Q

The Ward identity states that the dot product of a photon’s scattering amplitude and a four-vector representing this quantity is zero

A

(linear) momentum

85
Q

The time derivative of this quantity’s expectation value equals the negative expectation value of a scalar potential’s time derivative per Ehrenfest’s (AIR-en-fests) theorem

A

(linear) momentum

86
Q

Differing values of this quantity for light in a medium caused the Abraham–Minkowski controversy

A

(linear) momentum

87
Q

It’s not the Lagrangian, but the “action” coordinate is computed as a line integral [emphasize] of this quantity

A

(linear) momentum

88
Q

The derivative of the Lagrangian with respect to a generalized coordinate gives this quantity’s “conjugate” version

A

(linear) momentum

89
Q

In the usual phase space for a one-dimensional system, this quantity is plotted against position

A

(linear) momentum

90
Q

Ehrenfest’s theorem relates the time derivative of the expectation of this quantity with potential energy

A

(linear) momentum

91
Q

This quantity’s operator is equal to negative i times h-bar times the gradient

A

(linear) momentum

92
Q

The memory system of the Atanasoff–Berry computer placed these devices on rotating drums in order to regenerate them once per second

93
Q

These devices are used to block DᐧC signals in AᐧC coupling

94
Q

Configurations like basket winding are used to minimize the degree to which wires act as these devices “parasitically”

95
Q

Because half of the energy input to these devices is dissipated as heat, they are described with the equation “U equals one-half Q V”

96
Q

In the 2000s, many aluminum versions of these devices exploded in their namesake “plague”

97
Q

Highstrength versions of these devices, which make use of Helmholtz double layers, are called their “super” type

98
Q

The time constant equals (*) resistance times the characteristic quantity of these devices, which equals relative permittivity times area over distance for a type of them shown as two parallel lines in circuit diagrams

99
Q

These devices are connected in parallel to the load in simple low-pass filters, as their reactance is inversely proportional to frequency

100
Q

Drawing a Gaussian surface in a system with one of these elements is a simple way to justify the displacement current of Ampère’s law

101
Q

These elements decrease the reactance of a circuit because their voltage lags 90 degrees behind the current

102
Q

Tantalum and niobium pentoxide are frequently used to create high-efficiency types of these devices

103
Q

Putting one of these devices between two circuits can prevent the passage of (*) direct current, since these devices act as high-pass filters in series

104
Q

A form of these devices has a movable arm called a wiper connecting the input wire to a circular strip and shares a name with a type of voltage meter also called a potentiometer

105
Q

On these devices’ labels, successive colors of the rainbow indicate increasing orders of magnitude for up to six colored bands

106
Q

Radio-frequency types of these devices can be made with the Ayrton–Perry winding method

107
Q

The MELF type of these devices are used over normal surface mount examples of them when higher performance is needed

108
Q

Any two-terminal linear circuit can be simplified to an equivalent current source and one of these components according to Norton’s theorem

109
Q

Three of these devices whose strengths are known, and one of them whose strength is not known, form a Wheatstone bridge

110
Q

The thermal motion of electrons in these devices creates Johnson-Nyquist noise

111
Q

The fluctuation-dissipation theorem predicts that these devices produce Johnson-Nyquist noise

112
Q

A technique relating the derivative of total energy to the mean value of the partial derivative of the Hamiltonian and is named after this scientist and Hellmann

A

Richard Feynman

113
Q

To expand the time-evolution operator, a sum of constructs named after this scientist can be used to represent a Dyson series

A

Richard Feynman

114
Q

This physicist represented solutions to the Dirac equation in (1+1) spacetime dimensions using a checkerboard model, which he first published in a textbook written with Albert Hibbs

A

Richard Feynman

115
Q

This scientist’s “trick” for single-variable integrals involves introducing a second variable and differentiating to simplify the integrand

A

Richard Feynman

116
Q

This man’s doctoral advisor once postulated to him in a phone call that there only exists one electron in the universe

A

Richard Feynman

117
Q

This physicist discussed the possibility of manipulating single atoms in his lecture “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom”

A

Richard Feynman

118
Q

In a talk that this scientist gave for an American Physical Society meeting, he proposed reversing the lenses of an electron microscope so that the entire Encyclopedia Britannica could be written on the head of a pin

A

Richard Feynman

119
Q

To model high-energy collisions, this physicist proposed that hadrons consist of point-like entities known as partons

A

Richard Feynman

120
Q

Loop integrals can be evaluated using this man’s namesake parameterization

A

Richard Feynman

121
Q

In one book by this man, he recounts an episode where he discovers that “You just ask them?” and another story where he plays the frigideira in Brazil

A

Richard Feynman

122
Q

This man later wrote of Six (*) Easy Pieces and Six Not-So-Easy Pieces

A

Richard Feynman

123
Q

This physicist demonstrated that the Brownian Ratchet did not actually exhibit perpetual motion

A

Richard Feynman

124
Q

Smoluchowski and this physicist explained why a machine that uses Brownian motion to do work is impossible

A

Richard Feynman

125
Q

his physicist’s namesake element would have atomic number 137, which he claimed, based on the Bohr model, would be the last physically possible element

A

Richard Feynman

126
Q

This man and Gell-Mann explained the CP-violation of the weak force using a vector minus axial Lagrangian

A

Richard Feynman

127
Q

This scientist names a law giving the force between two current-carrying wires as an iterated line
integral

A

Andre-Marie Ampere

128
Q

This scientist’s right-hand grip rule predicts the direction of a magnetic field using the direction of one’s thumb.

A

Andre-Marie Ampere

129
Q

A law formulated by this scientist was corrected with a displacement current term by James Clerk Maxwell

A

Andre-Marie Ampere

130
Q

By analyzing a discovery by Hans Oersted, (“er-sted”), this physicist derived their namesake force law to describe how parallel current-carrying wires attract or repel each other

A

Andre-Marie Ampere

131
Q

For massless particles, an equation named for this physicist equals the Weyl (“vile”) equation

A

Paul Dirac

132
Q

Solutions to an equation named for this physicist can be modeled by a random walk on Feynman’s checkerboard

A

Paul Dirac

133
Q

An equation named for this physicist rigorously accounted for the hydrogen atom’s fine structure

A

Paul Dirac

134
Q

In a potential named for this physicist, there is only one symmetric bound state wavefunction

A

Paul Dirac

135
Q

He’s not Pauli, but this physicist’s gamma matrices act on spinors (“spinners”)

A

Paul Dirac

136
Q

Anti-commutation rules must be applied to quantize this physicist’s namesake field, since the anticommutator of this physicist’s namesake gamma matrices equals two times the metric tensor

A

Paul Dirac

137
Q

In the non-relativistic limit, this scientist’s namesake equation reduces to the Pauli equation

A

Paul Dirac

138
Q

This physicist sometimes names the interaction picture of quantum mechanics

A

Paul Dirac

139
Q

This physicist developed a generalization of the Poisson bracket used when analyzing systems with second class constraints

A

Paul Dirac

140
Q

This physicist posited that the existence of a magnetic monopole would be a sufficient condition for the quantization of charge

A

Paul Dirac

141
Q

Applying an equation named for this man to electrons bouncing off a potential on the order of the electron mass leads to the Klein paradox

A

Paul Dirac

142
Q

The difference in the number of left and right-handed modes in this man’s operator equals the topological charge in QCD according to the Atiyah-Singer index theorem

A

Paul Dirac

143
Q

One consequence of a statement named for this physicist is that higher potential barriers are more transparent to relativistic electrons

A

Paul Dirac

144
Q

our-component spinors appear in a relativistic wave equation named for this physicist

A

Paul Dirac

145
Q

The existence of this force’s exchange particle was indicated by a three jet q q-bar bremsstrahlung detected by TASSO at PETRA

A

strong force

146
Q

Particles stop interacting via this force above the Hagedorn temperature

A

strong force

147
Q

This force is described by a set of eight independent matrices named for Murray Gell-Mann

A

strong force

148
Q

This force is governed by a gauge theory whose symmetry group is SU(3) (“S-U-3”)

A

strong force

149
Q

Like electromagnetism, this fundamental force experiences asymptotic freedom

A

strong force

150
Q

The carriers of this force are represented as helices on Feynman diagrams and have eight possible states

A

strong force

151
Q

The exchange of pions as predicted by Hideki Yukawa explains the “residual” form of this phenomenon.

A

strong force

152
Q

This phenomenon’s effect is quantified by a tensor that includes a nonlinear term equal to the wedge product of the field A with itself, a feature that helps explain the OZI (“O-Z-I”) rule

A

strong force

153
Q

This interaction was once studied using Regge theory, leading to a calculation which gave rise to the first string theory

A

strong force