physical and cognitive development in young adulthood Flashcards
what defines emerging adulthood?
the lack of need for a family for financial support delays the landmarks often associated with adulthood like childbearing and marriage.
what is Schaie’s theory of environmental pressures
according to Schaie, young adults need to solve ill-structured problems which are problems with no clear answer such as whether to get married or what career to seek.
what are Shaie’s stages
acquisition stage achieving stage responsible stage executive stage reorganization stage reintegrative stage legacy-leaving stage
what is the acquisition stage
adolescent are procetced from life’s responsabitities and can solve problems that do not have a practical application. they can learn for learning’s sake
what is the achieving stage
the intellectual skills acquired during adolescence are being honed and used to solve problems with long-terms application
what is the responsible stage
problem solving takes into account the needs of others for whom the middle adult is responsible for, such as wife and coworkers.
what is the executive stage
for people to take supervisory roles and need to work on the consequences of their actions by learning more about complex relationships
what is the reorganizational stage
early old years are characterized with narrower responsibilities that change the focus on the self again
reintegrative stage
elder people spend their time to practice skills that are immediately beneficial to them and do not want to waste time on skill that would not be beneficial for their lives
legacy-leaving stage
working on establishing an account of their lives to pass on to the following generations
stages of college according to Perry
position 1: strict dualism position 2: multiplicity (prelegitimate) position 3: multiplicity (subordinate) position 4: late multiplicity position 5: contextual relativism position 6: commitment foreseen position 7, 8, 9: commitment and resolve
strict dualism
trusting the truth from authority without questioning
multiplicity (prelegitimate)
students encounter the multiplicity of theories but may maintain some idea that authority has the ultimate truth. students are confused because they do not have the capacity to organize all these new ideas
multiplicity (subordinate)
realizing that reasonable people may have differing views and that authority figure may not have all the answers. students may come to conflict with the idea that the world is not all just
late multiplicity
two possible outcomes
oppositional solution: either the authority is right or no one is, making their opinions equal
relative subordinate solution: understanding that some ideas are more valid than others depending on the support provided
contextual relativism
students understand to respect other opinions but are able to use critical thinking skills to evaluate theories based on the support provided
commitment foreseen
students start to commit to a specific worldview even though they realize there may be others that are equally valid
commitment and resolve
flowering of commitment and resolve to continue the exploration of ideas through adulthood
stage 1 emergence of reflective judgement
knowing is limited to single concrete instances
stage 2 emergence of reflective judgement
two categories of knowing: right answers and wrong answers
stage 3 emergence of reflective judgement
knowledge is uncertain in some areas and certain in others
stage 4 emergence of reflective judgement
given that knowledge is unknown in some cases, knowledge is assumed to be uncertain in general
stage 5 emergence of reflective judgement
knowledge is uncertain and must be understood within a context; can be justified by arguments within those contexts
stage 6 emergence of reflective judgement
knowlegde is uncertain; constructed by comparing and coordinating evidence and options
stage 7 emergence of reflective judgement
knowledge develops probabilistically through inquiry that generalizes across domains
“the person who” fallacy
discarding theories that have extensive support because of the knowledge of a person who is the exception
vividness effect
some vivid facts, like testimonials from personal experience could draw our attention even though they may conflict with supported data
Critical thinking
The ability to think clearly which means to make judgements based on evidence and being able to reflect upon one’s quality of thinking