Phobias (explanation) Flashcards
The behavioural approach to explaining phobias
What did Mowrer 1947 propose?
The two-process model to explain how phobias are learnt (behavioural approach)
What is the first stage?
Classical conditioning; inititation
What does this involve?
A phobia being acquired through association
What is the second stage?
Operant conditioning; maintenance
What does this involve?
The likelihood of a behaviour being repeated increasing if the outcome is rewarding
Who carried out the Little albert study?
Watson 1920
How was Little Albert’s phobia maintained?
- through operant conditioning (Little Albert avoided anything that looked remotely similar to a rat)
- behaviour was rewarding because it allowed Little Albert to avoid fear so was therefore repeated (negative reinforcement).
What did the study involve?
- every time little albert got close to the rat, a loud noise was made
- Little Albert associated the loud noise and the shock/fear that came with it with the rat through classical conditioning. - - rat produced a fear response, resulting in Little Albert’s phobia
What is social learning theory in terms of phobias and what kind of approach is it?
Idea that phobias may also be acquired through modelling the behaviour of others
Non-behaviourist approach
Evaluation?
- research support for the two-process model through asking people about phobias.
- Sue et al 1994; people with phobias often do recall a specific incident when their phobia appeared, e.g. being bitten by a dog.
- demonstrates key role of classical conditioning in developing phobias.
Evaluation?
- cognitive aspects to phobias that can’t be explained in a traditionally behaviourist framework
- cognitive approach; phobias may develop as the consequence of irrational thinking
- Such thoughts create extreme anxiety and may trigger a phobia (e.g. thinking that you could become trapped in a room and suffocate)
Evaluation?
- biological prepareness can also explain some phobias
- seligman 1970; animals are gentically programmed to learn an association between potentially life-threatening stimuli and fear
- as stimuli are ancient fers it would have been adaptive to rapily learn to avoid such stimuli
- explains why people are less likely to develip fears of modern objects like toasters
- suggests the behavuouyral apparoch cannot explain all phobias