philosophy Flashcards

1
Q

what Is the difference between scientific knowledge and everyday knowledge

A

everyday knowledge comes from daily experiences and is based on what’s known or accepted, but scientific knowledge is gained through formal research, experiments, and a systematic process to understand the world and is based on evidence and testing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how can we be sure of scientific claim’s validity

A

scientific research can be tested

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is scrutiny (repeatability)

A

for a theory to be scientific another scholar should be able to repeat the research and reach the same conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is required for scientific research to be credible

A

controllability: the study must be repeatable (If someone else does the same study, they should get similar results) and transparent (open and honest)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are 5 characteristics of scientific knowledge

A
  1. Generalisability - how useful the results of a study are for broader group of people or situations
  2. Controllability - research has to be repeatable and transparent
  3. Objectivity - scientific research should not depend on external pressures
  4. Recognised method - people have to trust in research method, so that results would be justified
  5. Parsimony (Aristotle) - favouring simpler, more straightforward explanations over complex ones if they both explain the same thing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the misconception with respect to the methods in management science

A

People tend to trust empirical research more than conceptual research because empirical studies are based on real data, observations, and tangible evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

which methods does empirical social research use

A

collecting and analysing actual information from the real world, which can provide concrete and measurable results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what about conceptual research

A

relies on theoretical frameworks, models, and abstract ideas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are theoretical concepts

A

concepts which require through philosophical thinking “organisations”, “firms”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is the misconception 2

A

is that science only describes how things are, not how they should be (prescriptive at normative). But in management science, it’s not just about describing; it also suggests how things should be done. For instance, if a theory says managers should communicate regularly with shareholders, other managers may start doing the same.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what Is normative sense (hynya)

A

what would be the best

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is actual meaning (facts)

A

what is the best

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the model of good reason of truth

A

a claim is true if the supporting reasons outweigh the opposing ones. But an argument isn’t automatically true just because it can’t be proven wrong.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Some common errors in reasoning for The good reason model of truth

A
  1. Argumentum ad ignorantiam
  2. “Petitio principii” or “begging the question”
  3. False dilemma
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

tell about Argumentum ad ignorantiam

A

This is when someone argues that something is true because there’s no proof of the opposite. (god exists)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

tell about “Petitio principii” or “begging the question”

A

when someone uses an argument that assumes the truth of what they’re trying to prove. In other words, the argument’s conclusion is already included in the premises. It’s like saying something is true because it’s true, without providing additional evidence or support.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

tell about False dilemma

A

presenting only two mutually exclusive options rather than the full, nuanced range of options. (If we don’t order pizza for dinner, we’ll have to eat the week-old spaghetti in the fridge.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what are fallacies

A

defects in an argument that cause it to be invalid or weak. But fallacy-free argument is still not good or powerful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

how the question “What is reasonable?” is understood in philosophy of science

A

Methodological question: question about correct methods of argumentation and research.
Epistemological question: question about the state of acquired knowledge.
Ontological question: question about the nature of social reality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what is methodology

A

science is looking for the best research methods in every discipline

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

tell about quantitive and qualitative research methods

A

Quantitive - uses data and statistical analysis
Qualitative - uses interviews, focus groups, and participant observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

tell about epistemological view

A

Epistemology deals with understanding what counts as knowledge. It’s about figuring out the difference between opinions, beliefs, and real knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

tell about ontological view

A

Ontology looks at how things and phenomena exist in reality. For example, in the study of organisations, people debate whether an organisation is just the sum of the individuals in it or if it’s something more. Some think that organisations have their existence beyond just the people in them. Others believe that an organisation’s life is connected to the individuals within it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

why is social reality is different from reality of natural sciences

A

because reality in natural sciences can exist without human interaction (stones), but reality in social sciences exists because humans agreed it does (money)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

what is Idealism🪄

A

suggests that everything we experience is a mental projection, an idea in our minds. According to idealists, things exist only if they’re observed or experienced. For example, George Berkeley believed that things like sounds exist only when someone experiences them. In this view, a falling tree in a deserted forest makes no sound because there’s no one there to hear it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

what is realism

A

proposes that things exist independently of us and our perceptions. Realists believe that reality is shaped beforehand and that our observations are influenced by our pre-existing knowledge and perceptions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

what is transcendental idealism

A

combination of idealism and realism (Immanuel Kant)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Being ecumenical means

A

willingness to promote unity and cooperation among different ways of reality perception and investigation. It involves fostering a spirit of understanding, dialogue, and collaboration between various branches.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

who is Auguste Comte

A

Auguste Comte, the founder of sociology, introduced the term positivism in the 20th century.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

what counts as knowledge according to positivism

A

only empirical (observative) and descriptive knowledge count as scientific ones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

what is Empiricism

A

the idea that we learn things by seeing, touching, hearing, and experiencing them directly, rather than just relying on ideas or theories. It’s all about learning through our senses and real-life observations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

what is Rationalism

A

the belief that reason and logical thinking are the main sources of knowledge. Trusting our ability to think and reason to understand the world and gain knowledge, rather than relying solely on experiences or observation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

tell about Modern science

A

originated in the enlightenment period, 16th-17th centuries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

who characterised Enlightenment and what was the slogan of that person

A

Enlightment was characterised by Kant and his slogan “dare to think”. The slogan marked acquisition and democratisation of knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

who are also two great reformer of Enlightment period and what have they done

A

Martin Luther and John Calvin are two great reformers. They have decided that Bible should be accessible to people without guidance and perception of pritsts, so Luther have made translation of the Bible from latin to German. This is also the implemention of “dare to think”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

what was Luther’s believe

A

in order to attain salvation one should not be dependent on the authority of others, but solely on their faith. “Through the faith only”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

who believed that knowledge cannot be assessed through the Bible, but can be attained only via 2 human capabilities

A

Francis Bacon
1. Rational thinking
2. Learning from observation and experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

what is critical rationalism (Kant)

A

some knowledge can be gained only via critical reflection, reflections and limits of thinking itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

what is priori knowledge (before experience and observation)

A

what you know to be true without having to see it or experience it, just via looking at the definition of the word

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

what is analytic a priory knowledge

A

understanding the meaning of words and concepts without a need for empirical evidence
“ my brother is my male sibling”
here, the predicate(male sibling) is included into subject (brother)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

what is synthetic a priory knowledge

A

one that needs empirical evidence or sensory evidence for its confirmation or denial. Does not have predicate included in the subject
“There is a church in my village” (is not true by definition)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

what was rationalists purpose

A

they were emphasising that for science it is essential to dig dipper, uncover the complete set of causal mechanisms hidden behind reasoning(surface)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

what is character of Newtonian mechanisms and geometry

A

character is a priori and synthetic and the same time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

who laid the foundation of empiricism and what did he claim

A

David Hume started empiricism and was claiming that we should solely believe in things that can be observed. He was arguing with Kant about causality, since it is not observable, Hume just didn’t believe in its existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

what is positivism

A

Positivism is an extreme of empiricism. Positivists claimed that science should be only based on what is observable, therefore they accepted only synthetic a priory knowledge, which requires empirical evidence. However, positivists believed in independent reality, that things are happening in the world even if human is not watching them (sounds)

46
Q

logical positivism by Bertrand Russell

A

only knowledge that can be tracked back to observational data can be qualified as scientific knowledge

47
Q

what is deduction

A

when someone gets specific conclusion out of general claims and laws (Sherlock Holmes)

48
Q

what is syllogism

A

the diagram of reasoning that is used for deduction
- Major premise, X and Y (all ravens are black)
-Manor premise, P is X (P is raven)
- Conclusion, P is Y (P is black)

49
Q

induction

A

getting general claims from specific observation

50
Q

what is problem of induction

A

out of limited set of observations one can never get general principle of law with the full certainty

51
Q

what is correspondence model of truth

A

a belief is true only if it corresponds with something that exists in the world
example: my belief that there is a table in the room is true only if there actually is a table in the room

52
Q

what is coherence model of truth

A

a belief is true only if it coheres with not only my observation, but also with theoretical explanations

53
Q

what are observable concepts

A

concepts that can be observed and measured

54
Q

theoretical concepts

A

complex phenomena that cannot be measured easily (selfishness)

55
Q

what are 3 conditions that a theoretical concept should have in order to be a good concept

A
  1. Robustness - concept should fit into more than one context
  2. Fit: the claims that are maid by concept should fit in more general theory
  3. Predictability: credible predictions about occurrence of the phenomenon must be made
56
Q

what is coherence

A

function of mutual support, in coherence model of truth the claim is not only supported by observations, it should also be coherent with other arguments about how the claim should be understood and operationalised

57
Q

how does the coherence model of truth give answer to the induction problem

A

since it’s not possible to generate trustworthy common scientific concept via only using limited source of observations (induction problem), the coherence model tells that observation should be supported by more reasons.

58
Q

what is standard model of science

A

respect empiricism and rationalism at the same time

59
Q

what is critical rationalism by Popper

A

popper claimed that searching for confirmation theories to fix the problem of induction is not right thing to do. He introduced the opposing way to solve the problem: Critical rationalism.

60
Q

what is falsification

A

falsifying the claims and theories,

61
Q

what is critical rationalism

A

the believe that pure science is obtained by falsifying claims and theories

62
Q

how is scientific knowledge distinguished from non-scientific

A

Scientific knowledge can be tested, reviewed and probably falsified. But non-scientific knowledge because it either expresses theories which can be never untrue (tautologies) either claims are filled with content and too general (can’t be tested)

63
Q

can observations lead to confirmation or falsification of a claim?

A

No. Observations can never lead to falsification or confirmation of a claim (it can not be accepted that people are not selfish just because Maria Tereza existed)

64
Q

what did Thomas Kuhn discovered about growth of scientific knowledge

A

the process of growth of scientific knowledge is not stable, it goes via changing periods of CONSOLIDATION (steady growth) and REVOLUTION

65
Q

what is paradigm

A

the unique discovery which appears within one of the schools, when different schools exist next to each other and conduct different ways of research

66
Q

what 4 characteristics does paradigm contain

A
  1. Fundamental theories (theories that all scientists agree to)
  2. Breakthroughs (paradigm itself), which will function as example for new theories
  3. Shared scientific values (openness and transparency about methods)
  4. Shared methodological regulations (Scientists in a paradigm follow the same rules for how they do things)
67
Q

what is normal science

A

when scientists agree within this broadened paradigm on the problems, the bet way of conducting research and recognition of scientific rules

68
Q

how does paradigm function

A

paradigm is taken for granted as the basis of scientific work

69
Q

what is phlogiston theory

A

the theory about the phenomenon that when something was burning, the substance phlogiston was realised, which was absorbed by the air. So, no burning could take place in vacuum chamber. This is first paradigm in chemistry.

70
Q

what is anomaly

A

a very different occurrence than what would not be expected based on accepted theory

71
Q

why is idea of Kuhn about mutually exclusive paradigms is outdated

A

because different theories have different advantages and disadvantages, theories can exist alongside each other

72
Q

what are 3 points on which type of research depends

A
  1. The question asked
  2. The object or concept which is studied
  3. The purpose of the study
73
Q

by which two question can type of research be distinguished

A
  1. What is the NATURE of the study: this could be explaining phenomena and understanding the phenomena
  2. What is the LEVEL of analyses: individual level or level of organisations, systems
74
Q

what is the approach of methodological individualism

A

when the behaviour of individuals is seen as independent from the community (individuals determine what society is)

75
Q

on which approach is methodological individualism based

A

it is based on ontological individualism

76
Q

what is ontological individualism

A

a view that no supra-individual entity (like organisation) exists in reality; only individuals and their actions are real

77
Q

what are 2 levels of character of the research

A
  • Micro
  • Macro
78
Q

what are 2 main types of research for defining the character of research

A
  1. Perspective of spectator
  2. Perspective of participant
79
Q

tell about perspective of spectator

A

explains behaviour of individuals at the macro level (external causes of behaviour)

80
Q

tell about perspective of participant

A

not only explaining the behaviour, but also understanding the behaviour (reasons behind the behaviour)

81
Q

what is the difference of “perspective of spectator” and “perspective of participant”

A

if you adopt perspective of spectator, your goal is to find reasons and links between phenomena, but if u follow perspective of participant you put yourself onto the shoes of individual and enable yourself to understand the internal reasons behind the behaviour

82
Q

what is Hermeneutics (by Dilthey)

A

the art of interpretation, understanding the meanings. it searches for meaningful explanations behind the phenomena

83
Q

what is used more often: perspective of spectator or perspective of participant

A

The perspective of spectator is used more often, since understanding the internal perspective of individuals might be very tricky (some people hide their motives due to external pressure, different individuals have different perspectives)

84
Q

what is rational choice theory

A

way to apply methodological individualism. Via this theory one can understand the changes in institutions as the result of behaviour and interactions of rational individuals.
According to this theory, society is the result of cooperation between individuals who harmonise their behaviour to attain goals

85
Q

why does rational choice theory corresponds to methodological individualism

A

because rational theory also tells that individuals determine society, not the other way around

86
Q

why is cooperation a rational choice

A

because some things are created that could not have been created individually

87
Q

what else does rational choice theory accept

A

it accepts that all people are perfectly rational individuals

88
Q

why are people perfectly rational individuals

A
  • the preferences of people are ordered according priority
  • people have information about all outcomes and options
  • people can calculate the best mix of results
89
Q

why are some assumptions of rational choice theory are not always applicable

A

because in some situations individuals are not able to identify all possible options and outcomes of their actions

90
Q

what is expected utility

A

tool used to determine the rationality of choice.
AMOUNT OF PREFERENCE * CHANCE THAT OPTION WILL OCCURE

91
Q

what is game theory (by John von Neumann)

A

application of rational choice theory. used to model and analyse human interactions. Analyses situations in which the choices of people are independent, means they depend on other members of society. (the result of individuals behaviour depends on the behaviour of others)

92
Q

what is strategic rationality

A

people foresee the choices of others to the best of their ability (game rock, paper, scissors)

93
Q

what is coordination in the Game theory

A

involves 2 individuals, both with two choice options, but 4 possible outcomes (Nash equilibrium and Pareto possible outcomes)

94
Q

what is Nash equilibrium

A

no choice can be changed in the favour of other players

If player changes his own choice, it won’t benefit either, as he is satisfied with the current state.

95
Q

Pareto possible outcomes

A

no choice can be changed without harming other players

if player will change his choice, he will harm at leat one player

96
Q

what Is the problem with rational choice theory

A

the human behaviour is studied from the spectators objective (agents), but at the same time draws conclusions from the participants objectives (actors)

97
Q

in which two ways Welfare economist use the concept of preference

A
  1. Behaviourist conception: consumers choose things they prefer, so that their choices reflect their true preferences
  2. Mentalist conception: consumers prefer what they are most comfortable with and what gives them most pleasure
98
Q

what is methodological collectivism based on

A

assumes that actions of individuals are determined by society. methodological collectivism is based on ontological holism

99
Q

what does ontological holism mean

A

Tells that whole Is more than just a sum of individual parts. (all opposite to the ontological individualism)

100
Q

what was the point of view of Emile Durkheim on the ontological holism and methodological collectivism

A

he argued that a community is reality of its own(not just sum of individuals).
According to Durkhem, it is not individual behaviour that explains society, but it is the society that develops a culture that determines the actions and thoughts of individuals.

101
Q

what about macro level corresponding to methodological collectivism

A

macro level claims that individuals role is not that important, it says that individuals are the ones influenced by the community and organisation

102
Q

what is functional explanation

A

explanation of the behaviour of something by looking at the function or purpose of this behaviour within a contextual whole

103
Q

what is the difference between functionality and causality

A

Causality - assesses events proceeding a phenomenon
Functionality - assesses the goal a phenomenon serves
example:
phenomenon: singing bird
causality: birds nervous system
functionality: seducing female birds

104
Q

why functional explanations = system explanations

A

because functional explanations explore goals which individual follows in order to fulfil the system in which he functions

105
Q

what is the functional (systematic) explanation of crime by Durkheim

A

The goal of crime is to keep society healthy, via levelling up the solidarity between people, making contrast between civilians and criminals.

106
Q

what are problems with functional (systematical) explanations

A

Problem 1: Assumed goal of social phenomena, such as criminality. Durkhem claims that society’s ultimate goal is balance and unity. However, there is no empirical basis for this.
Problem 2: Functionalism explains things by their purpose (goal), not their cause. So it uses teleological metaphysical explanations, not the causal metaphysical explanations.

107
Q

what are teleological metaphysical explanations

A

same with functionality, explain the goal for which a phenomenon happens

108
Q

what are causal metaphysical explanations

A

same with causality, explain processes proceeding the phenomenon

109
Q

how can one take perspective of participant in the macro level

A

one can try to understand the phenomena by taking part in social practises, that is the only way to understand what is important within a group
(considering that participant here symbolises the group, rather than individual)

110
Q

what is the difference between following the rules (rule-following behaviour) and acting in accordance with rules (regular or patterned behaviour)

A
  1. Following the rules (rule-following behaviour): This is when you consciously do something because a rule tells you to.
  2. Acting in accordance with rules (regular or patterned behaviour): This is when you do something regularly, but it might not be because a strict rule forces you. For example, if you always eat a sandwich for breakfast, it’s a regular behavior, but there might not be a strict rule making you do it.
111
Q

why normatively (acting with in accordance with rules) always assumes fallibility

A

one is not acting in accordance with the rule if there is no possibility of failing the rule. Rules only function as norms when there is possibility of failure

112
Q

what is symbolic interactionism

A

the task of symbolic interactionism is to reveal what is normal. Instead of creating norms, people absorb the norms which are prevalent is specific culture