Phil midterm 1 Flashcards
what 2 conditions does Theatetus suggest are necessary conditions for knowledge?
1) that something is true judgment
2) free of mistakes
how does Socrates convince Theatetus that these two conditions aren’t sufficient for knowledge?
- He says that true judgment does not equal true knowledge
-says that with the 2 current conditions in place, it is still possible to persuade someone to form a decision without having true knowledge
what does Theatetus suggest as the missing condition of knowledge?
-it needs to be true judgment with an account to = knowledge
what level of certainty does Astell require for legitimate belief?
-she is a high-standards person and requires a lot of evidence to be certain
why does Astell require this level of certainty?
-because she says that we can attain knowledge only by affirming those ideas that are clear and distinct
what level of certainty does Descartes require for his beliefs? why?
-he is a high-standards person and requires a lot of evidence
-because he believes perception is not 100% reliable and that he has been done wrong in the past by not having enough evidence
how do dreams support Descartes’s main conclusion about his beliefs?
-Dreams support his argument because he can convince /prove that you can’t know whether you are dreaming or awake, therefore proving that you can’t know if something is knowledge or not because you do not know what state you were in when you acquired it, and for it to be knowledge according to him, you must be awake
what step of Descartes dreaming argument can Shepard be taken as denying?
-she claims that his first premise is false- (everything you can experience while awake you can experience in a dream)
what is Shepard’s argument that the dreaming argument is wrong?
-she says- you can’t have the experiences you are having right now in a dream/while dreaming
-she thinks our experiences come ordered
what makes Descartes worry that he must even doubt that there are things such as colors, and shapes, or that 2+3=5?
-he claims that all beliefs are formed using various methods, and if you form a belief like 2+3=5 using a certain method and then form another belief with that method and it turns out to be false, then you have to get rid of all your beliefs you had made using the same method because they now also could be wrong
what is the difference between reductionism and non-reductionism about personal identity?
-reductionism: the self and personal identity are constituted by other features
-non-reductionism: the self/personal identity is not constituted by other features
what is the difference between qualitative and numerical identity?
qualitative:
-sharing all features
-a is identical to b if they all have features in common
numerical identity:
-a is numerically identical to b when a=b
-ex. 1 thing, 2 names- Clark Kent/Superman
what is the physical view of personal identity?
-you are the same as your body
-you are the same person at another time iff you have the same crucial body parts (brain)
-where your body goes, you go
what does Locke mean when he says personal identity is a forensic notion?
-part of his memory view
-you are the same person at an earlier time iff you remember being that person/ doing what they did
in what does Locke think personal identity consists and why?
-in consciousness, because that’s where our memories are/we are