PHAR 9: Drug Metabolism and Toxicology Flashcards
Observe the learning outcomes of this session
What is toxicology?
- Toxicology is commonly called the “science of poisons”.
- More specifically, it is a field of science where an understanding of the potential harm that can come from exposure to chemical, physical, and biological agents is sought.
What are toxicants and toxins?
- Substances that cause toxicity are collectively called toxicants, with those produced naturally (e.g., in a plant) also known as toxins.
- You will find that these terms are used flexibly/interchangeably so you may encounter both.
How can we classify toxicants?
- We can classify toxicants in multiple ways, such as their intrinsic nature, origin, target, etc.
- For example, toxic responses/effects may be observed for both chemical and non-chemical agents that interact with components of biological systems:
- chemical: e.g. ethanol
- physical: e.g. ionising radiation
- biological: e.g. botulinum toxin
Match the terms to the most appropriate definition of toxicity
What is systemic toxicity?
- This affects the whole organism or a large number of different tissues/organs.
- Toxicants that affect very common biochemical processes typically give rise to systemic toxicity
- e.g., hydrogen cyanide inhibits cytochrome oxidase and the oxygen utilization in any relevant tissue and therefore its effects are widespread
What is target organ toxicity?
- this affects only one or more target organs.
- Toxicity may be organ-specific due to accumulation, function, metabolism, etc.
- e.g., asbestos causes inflammation specifically in the respiratory system and subsequent pleural mesothelioma
Describe how toxicants can be classified by duration or time of the original exposure
- acute
- subchronic
- chronic
- carcinogenicity
- developmental
Describe acute toxicity
- acute toxicity occurs almost immediately after exposure.
- Acute exposure is usually a single dose or a series of doses received within a 24-hour period.
Describe subchronic toxicity
- Subchronic toxicity results from repeated exposure for several weeks or months.
- This is a common human exposure pattern for some pharmaceuticals and environmental agents.
- Examples include:
i) ingestion of warfarin (anticoagulant) for several weeks as a treatment for venous thrombosis, can cause internal bleeding;
ii) workplace exposure to lead over a period of several weeks can result in anemia.
Describe chronic toxicity
- Chronic toxicity represents cumulative damage to an organism - many months or years to develop a disease.
- With repeated exposures or long-term continual exposure, the damage from these subclinical exposures slowly builds up until it exceeds the threshold for chronic toxicity.
- Ultimately, the damage becomes so severe that the organ can no longer function normally and a variety of chronic toxic effects may result.
- Examples include
i) hepatic cirrhosis in alcoholics who have ingested ethanol for several years;
ii) chronic kidney disease in workmen with several years of exposure to lead;
iii) chronic bronchitis in long-term cigarette smokers;
iv) pulmonary fibrosis in coal miners (black lung disease)
Describe carcinogenicity
- Carcinogenicity is a complex multistage process of abnormal cell growth and differentiation.
- The process normally takes many years and cancer is commonly, but not exclusively, a disease of old age.
Describe developmental toxicity
- Adverse toxic effects to the developing embryo or foetus.
- Can result from toxicant exposure to either parent before conception or to the mother and her developing embryo-foetus.
- The three basic types of developmental toxicity are:
- embryolethality
- embryotoxicity
- teratogenicity.
List some factors that influence the toxicity of agents
- Form(ulation) and innate chemical (re)activity
- Dose
- Exposure route and duration of exposure
- Species
- Sex
- Age
- Physicochemical properties
- Extent, type, and site of metabolism
- Route of excretion
- Presence of other chemicals - additive/synergistic/antagonistic effects
What is arguably the most straightforward and clear endpoint that can be measured for a toxin?
- death
What is the median lethal dose (LD50 / MLD)?
How useful is this measurement?
- the median lethal dose describes the dose required to kill half of the population under study
- Therefore if the toxicological endpoint is death, then the LD50 is equivalent to the TD50.
- This was a common endpoint used in the early days of toxicology/pharmacology, but it is not a particularly useful endpoint to use, and therefore more specific measures are commonly used to assess toxicity.
- Clearly, if we are establishing the toxic effects of a toxicant or a drug in humans, then it would be both inappropriate (to say the very least) to use death as the toxicological endpoint!!!
- Note that although some regulatory agencies involved in the classification of toxicants often include LD50 measures, it is not considered to be very useful in assessing the safety of drug candidates in drug development.
- As above, more mechanistically-relevant and/or nuanced measures of toxicity are preferred, such as biomarkers of inflammation, DNA damage, cellular aberrations, etc.
Why is it that in some cases it is better to describe drug effects as on-target or off-target instead of non-toxic and toxic?
- in some cases we may deliberately be seeking to cause toxicity:
- In PHAR 7 – Antimicrobials, we introduced the concept of using differences between species to be able to differentially affect biological functions
- e.g., specific inhibition of bacterial ribosomal function vs human ribosomal function, often with the intention of deliberately inhibiting/disrupting/dysregulating function to prevent infection.
- In this instance, administration of the drug is to deliberately cause toxicity in the target cell, and response measures of this would reflect the efficacy of the drug (on-target); antimicrobials are known to cause toxic effects in humans (off-target)
- In PHAR 8 – Cancer Drug Therapy, we studied the related idea that we can target specific cell sub-populations based on biological differences
- e.g., preferentially targeting rapidly proliferating cancer cells with DNA alkylating agents
- In this instance, the administration of the drug is to deliberately cause cellular toxicity in those specific cell sub-populations (on-target) but the drug may affect other cells (off-target).
What is the dose-response assessment?
- The dose-response assessment quantitates toxicological hazards that have been identified;
- it determines the relationship between dose and incidence of (adverse) effects (usually in humans).
What are the two major extrapolations required in the dose-response assessment?
- The first is an extrapolation from high experimental doses to low environmental doses.
- Non-carcinogenic effects (e.g., neurotoxicity) are considered to have dose thresholds below which the effect does not occur.
- Carcinogenic effects are generally not considered to have a threshold and mathematical models are generally used to provide estimates of carcinogenic risk at very low dose levels.
- The second is an extrapolation from preclinical models to humans; safety in experimental animals does not necessarily indicate safety in humans, and toxicity in experimental animals does not necessarily predict toxicity in man.
What is acceptable daily intake (ADI)?
- The ADI procedure is used to calculate permissible chronic exposure levels for humans.
- For this purpose, it is assumed (for convenience) that humans are as sensitive as animal test species.
- The ADI is the amount of a substance to which a person can be exposed each day for a long time (usually a lifetime) without suffering harmful effects.
- It is determined by applying safety factors to the highest dose in human or animal studies that has been demonstrated not to cause toxicity.
What is NOAEL and LOAEL?
What do they help us understand?
- NOAEL: No observable adverse effect level.
- The highest dose level at which no adverse response is detected.
- LOAEL: Lowest observable adverse effect level.
- The lowest dose level at which an adverse response is detected.
- Knowing these doses helps us establish a point of departure in the toxicological dose-response curve where the response increases from no effect.
Why do we want to know the NOAEL and LOAEL scores?
- The main reason is to calculate how much of a substance someone can be exposed to on a regular basis (e.g., daily) without experiencing adverse/toxic responses.
- Doing this is useful in many situations, particularly in those where it is possible to regulate exposures to substances (e.g., substances in food products, occupational exposures to chemicals, environmental exposures arising from known sources).
- Knowing the range of doses that elicit a response allows an acceptable daily intake (ADI) to be calculated and used to help ensure humans are not exposed above this level.
- Clearly, it would not be a good idea to set the at the same as the NOEAL, as this value may have been determined in an animal model, and therefore there is some model-to-human extrapolation to account for.
- The ADI calculation takes into account the NOAEL value that has been determined and then applies a number of uncertainty factors (or safety factors).
What is the ADI calculation?
- ADI = NOAEL / Uncertainty Factors
Study these images of a dose-response curve showing the NOAEL and LOAEL