Pg 51 Flashcards
What are the different ways that people that are not closely connected to a corporation but still improperly use inside information can be held liable?
– Misappropriation of information
– Tippee liability
Who does the misappropriation of information with relation to insider trading apply to?
This applies to functional or temporary insiders, which are people that are not in the permanent employ of a corporation but still have assumed a position of trust and confidence regarding material information shared with them.
If a defendant is a financial printer that got inside information about the identities of corporate targets for a takeover bid, and then he bought stock in the target corporation knowing the price would rise soon, what is his liability?
Because he is not an employee of the corporation but was in a position of trust and confidence regarding that material information, he became a temporary insider that had a duty to disclose or abstain. He violated that duty, so the breach of it is enough to be insider trading under misappropriation of information. He stole [misappropriated] valuable non-public information that was given to him in confidence.
On an exam what is the best way to figure out what relationships rise to the level of misappropriation of information and which do not for insider trading?
The key is whether there is an expectation of confidentiality that was either express or implied. If so, that triggers the temporary insider status.
If an accountant learns nonpublic information about a corporation’s finances while doing its taxes, then he buys stock in the corporation before he files the taxes, what has happened?
He is liable for insider trading under misappropriation of information because he became a temporary insider
How does someone become a temporary insider in order to be liable for insider trading under misappropriation of information?
These all create an automatic relationship of trust and confidence:
- when a person agrees to maintain information in confidence
- there is a history or practice of sharing confidences between two people so the recipient would know that the information is material nonpublic information and that he is expected to keep it in confidence
- if someone gets material nonpublic information from a spouse, parent, kid, or sibling
Can you be guilty of misappropriation of information under insider trading if you give a non-answer?
No, because the standard is affirmative misrepresentation
What is Tippee Liability with regard to insider trading?
When an insider gives material nonpublic information to someone else and that other person trades on it
What is a tipper and what is a tippee with regard to tippee liability for insider trading?
– Tipper: the person making the tip. This involves insiders like directors, officers, people with fiduciary duties, etc.
– Tippee: the person the tip is made to
What would be considered a tip with regard to tipper liability for insider trading?
When an insider makes a selective disclosure of material nonpublic information.
Who usually gets the harsher punishment for Tippee Liability?
The tipper’s actions are usually more reprehensible, so he is usually penalized more and he’s often liable for the profits of the tippee (but the tippee is also liable).
What are the elements of tippee liability for insider trading?
- tip must be improper
– tippee must be aware that disclosure is improper
– tipper doesn’t have to know that the tippee will trade on the information
– fair disclosure
What is involved in the element of tippee liability that says the tip must be improper?
This happens when:
- a tip is given to a relative or friend
- the tipper expects to get a pecuniary gain from the disclosure because the tippee is in a position to confirm that type of benefit
What is involved in the element of tippee liability that says the tippee must be aware that disclosure is improper?
If the tippee is not a relative or a friend of the tipper and isn’t in a position to confer a pecuniary benefit on the tipper, then the tippee would likely not be aware that the disclosure was improper
When will the tippee not have liability under tippee liability?
If an officer gives his 18-year-old daughter material nonpublic information about a corporation and she trades on it not realizing that it is improper, only the officer would be liable because the tippee had no scienter