Personality Final Flashcards
The Cognitive Domain
Understanding of people’s perceptions, thoughts, feelings, desires, and other conscious experiences
Big focus on the interpretation of events (including how people attribute responsibility)
Cognition
Refers to awareness and thinking; the mental acts of perceiving, attending to, interpreting, remembering, believing, judging, deciding, and anticipating
Information processing
Transformation of sensory input into mental representations that can be manipulated
Perception
Giving order to the information our sense organs bring in
Interpretation
Making sense of, or explaining, various events in the world; giving meaning to events
Conscious goals
Standards that people develop for evaluating themselves and others; age/culture specific
Rod and Frame Test (RTF)
- Participant sits in darkened room and is instructed to watch a glowing rod surrounded by a glowing square frame
- Experimenter controls the tils of the rod, the chair, and the frame
- Participant’s task is to adjust the rod by turning a dial so that rod is upright (have to ignore cues in the visual field)
Field dependent
Adjust rod in the direction of the titled frame
Field independent
Disregard external cues and use information from their bodies to adjust the rod
Are differences in perception related to differences in personality?
- Field independent students favour sciences, math, engineering; preference for non-social situations and are more autonomous
- Field dependent students favour social sciences and education; rely on social information and orientated towards people
Reducer/augmenter theory
- Low pain tolerance have a nervous system that amplifies (augments) the subjective impact of sensory cues
- High pain tolerance? Nervous system that reduces the effect of sensory stimulation
Reducers
Seek out strong stimulation to compensate for low sensory reactivity (e.g., drink more coffee, listen to loud music, lower threshold for boredom)
Kelley’s Personal Construct Theory
People are motivated to understand, predict, and control events in their lives
Role of constructs: set of observations and meaning of those observations; e.g., gravity
Personal constructs
Constructs a person routinely uses to interpret and predict events
Anxiety
As a result of not being able to understand and predict life events
o Result of personal constructs failing to make sense of current realities
How can a construct fail?
- Too rigid and/or impermeable to new experiences
- Too permeable or applied too liberally
Locus of control
Whether people locate personal responsibility internally (within themselves) or externally (in fate, luck, or chance)
E.g., when you see a person who gets good grades do you think it is as a result of luck or personal efforts?
Formulated from work on social learning theory
Generalized expectancies
Base expectancies about what will happen on generalized expectancies of whether they have ability to influence events
External locus of control
Expectancy that events are outside of one’s control
Internal locus of control
Expectancy that events are under one’s control; high degree of personal responsibility; more conducive to well-being
Learned Helplessness
Occurs when people are stuck in an unpleasant situation that is outside of their control
Explanatory style
Tendencies people have to frequently use certain explanations
Pessimistic explanatory style
Internal, stable, and global causes for bad events
Optimistic explanatory style
External, temporary, and specific causes of events
Personality revealed through goals
What a person wants to happen/achieve; differences between people is attributable to personality
Cognitive social learning theory
• Personality is expressed in goals; how people think about themselves relative to their goals and how they value/strive for certain goals
• Argues people:
o Have intentions/forethought
o Are reflective/anticipate future events
o Monitor behaviour/evaluate their progress
o Learn by observing others
Self-efficacy
One can execute a specific course of action to achieve a goal
Regulatory focus theory
People regulate goal-directed behaviours in two ways that serve two different needs
Promotion focus
Concerned with advancement, growth, accomplishments; correlates with extraversion and behavioural activation
Prevention focus
Concerned with protection, safety, prevention of negative outcomes and failures; correlates with neuroticism, harm avoidance, impulsivity [but negatively]
Cognitive-Affective Personality System (CAPS)
- Personality as an organization of cognitive and affective activities which influence how people respond to certain situations
- Each individual is characterized by a stable network of mental activities
- People differ in the organization of cognitive and affective processes
- “If… then…” propositions: if situation A, then the person does X; but if situation B, then person does Y = personality distinguishes which
Self-concept
Your understanding of yourself
o “Athletic, tall, lazy, etc.”
Self-esteem
How you feel about who you are
o “I like that I’m athletic, I don’t like that I’m lazy”
Social identity
How you present yourself to others
o May not be consistent with your self-concept
The Development of the Self-Concept at infancy
Distinction between our body and everything else’ boundaries exist for what is “me” and “not me”
The Development of the Self-Concept at 18 months
Self-recognition with mirrors; important because pretend play requires it (i.e., knowing what is pretend vs. reality)
The Development of the Self-Concept at 24 months
Self-recognition in a photograph; also development of expectations/rule following = development of self-esteem
The Development of the Self-Concept between 2-3 years
Identify their biological sex and age, and expand their self-concept to include reference to a family (e.g., brother, sister)
The Development of the Self-Concept between 3-12 years
Self-concept focus is on developing skills/talents
The Development of the Self-Concept 5-6+ years
Comparing their skills/abilities to others (social comparison); learn they can lie/keep secrets (private self-concept)
The Development of the Self-Concept at teen years
Take on perspective of others or to imagine how one appears to other people (perspective taking); see themselves as objects of others’ attention (objective self-awareness)
The Development of the Self-Concept at adulthood
Provides person with a sense of continuity and framework for understanding past, present, and future behaviour
Self-schema
Refers to the specific knowledge structure, or cognitive representation of the self-concept
Possible selves
Many ideas people have about who they might become, hope to become, or fear they will become; forms part of a self-concept
Self-guides
Standards one uses to organize information and motivate behaviour; two types
Ideal self
What a person themselves wants to be; sad if real self doesn’t fit this
o Focuses attention on achievement and goal accomplishment (promotion focus)
Ought self
Person’s understanding of what others want them to be; anxious if real self doesn’t fit this
o Focus attention on avoiding harm (prevention focus)
Development of Self-Esteem in early childhood
Identify standards or expectations for behaviour and live up to them; pride and self-esteem felt when mastering basic activities (e.g., toilet training)
Development of Self-Esteem in later childhood
Social comparison; if they are doing better than others = higher self-esteem
Development of Self-Esteem in adulthood
Set of internal standards; what they hold important to their self-concept; behaviours inconsistent with standards = lower self-esteem
Evaluation of oneself
Self-esteem is the sum of your positive/negative reactions to all the aspects of your self-concept
Self-esteem can fluctuate from day-to-day, but typically centers around average self-esteem
Can evaluate yourself in different aspects of life; e.g., high academic self-esteem but low dating self-esteem
Global self-esteem
Composite of several areas of self-evaluation
Low self-esteem persons are more likely to…
Perform poorly and give up earlier on future tasks; fear failure (consistent with self-concept)
High self-esteem persons are less likely to…
Give up and more likely to work just as hard on the second task as the first; fear not succeeding (inconsistent with self-concept so strive to disprove information)
Self-complexity
We have many roles/aspects to our self-concept
Collective self-esteem
Individual’s global self-evaluation as a member of social groups or categories
Defensive pessimism
Person facing a challenge expects to do poorly; impact of failure is lessened if they expect it
Self-handicapping
Person deliberately does the things that increase the probability that he or she will fail; e.g., not studying for an upcoming exam
Self-esteem variability
Individual difference characteristic; strength of short-term fluctuations in ongoing self-esteem
Social Component of the Self: Social Identity
The part of the self that is shown to others; used to create impressions;
Does include gender and ethnicity (even if they do not factor into a person’s self-concept)
- Made up of continuity and contrast
Continuity
Important aspects remain relatively stable; gender, language, ethnicity, SES
- Other aspects of identity change gradually – education, occupation, marital status
Contrast
Social identity differentiates you from other people
- Music choices, ethnic background, eye colour
Identity Crises
Feelings of anxiety that accompany efforts to define or redefine one’s own individuality and social reputation
Development of identity
Struggles with identity occur during late adolescence and early adulthood
Some will experiment with different identities to find the one that fits
Some will accept and adopt a ready-made social role; strong influence of others
Identity deficit
Arises when a person has not formed an adequate identity; trouble making decisions
- Occurs when a person discards old values or goals; prompts the person to search for new beliefs, values, and goals
- Vulnerable to influence from others
Identity conflict
Incompatibility between two or more aspects of identity
- Occur when a person is forced to make a tough life decision
- Referred to as “approach-approach” conflict; person wants to reach two mutually contradictory goals
- Feelings of guilt/remorse of letting themselves and others down
Two steps of resolving identity crises
- Deciding which values are most important to them
- Transforming abstract values into desires and behaviours
Mid-life crisis
- Feel life is inauthentic
- Regretful of choices made early in life
- Crises look similar to those of adolescence
- Time of changing priorities