Personality Factors for Stress Flashcards
Who researched the Type A personality and when?
Friedman and Rosenman 1959
The Type A behaviour Pattern revolves around 3 principle factors (C.A.T) , using them as prompts describe the Type A personality
Competitive
- Always playing to win at games and work
- Achievement measured as material productivity
Anger
- Self-critical
- Hostile to the outside world
- Anger often directed inwards
Time pressure
- Working against the clock
- Doing several things at once
- Irritation and impatience with others
- Unhappy doing nothing
Type A personality - explain Kirkaldy et al’s 2002 research and what it shows
Kirkaldy et al. 2002→
Study of over 300 German managers with Type A behaviour with an external locus of control (likely to believe in bad luck and fate) and they had higher perceived stress levels than those of a group of managers with Type B personality and an internal focus of control (they believed they were in charge of their own situation.)
← What does this show?
This research appears to show that the negative health consequences of Type A behaviour, combined with an external locus of control, may outweigh the superficial attractiveness of Type A in a work setting.
Type A personality - explain the Williams et al (2003) study
15 year study that focussed on younger individuals who exhibited Type A personality.
They found that certain aspects of Type A behaviour were unhealthier than others: with hostility and impatience putting individuals at an increased risk of developing high blood pressure- a major precursor to heart attacks.
Who conducted the Key study into the potential link between Type A personality and CHD?
Friedman and Rosenman (1974)
What was the Friedman and Rosenman (1974) ‘Western Collaborative Group’ study investigating?
Potential links between the Type A behaviour pattern and cardiovascular (heart) disease
What was the procedure of the Friedman and Rosenman (1974) ‘Western Collaborative Group’ study?
Using structured interviews, 3200 Californian men, aged between 39 and 59, were categorized as either Type A, Type X (a balance of type A and B), or Type B.
– This large sample was followed up for eight and a half years to assess their lifestyles and health outcomes
What were the findings of the Friedman and Rosenman (1974) ‘Western Collaborative Group’ study?
By the end of the study 257 (/3200) of the men had developed Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) of which 70% were from the Type A group – twice the rate of the heart disease found in the Type B group
– This difference in the incidence of CHD between the two groups was independent on lifestyle factors such as smoking and obesity that are known to increase the chances of heart disease
In the Friedman and Rosenman (1974) ‘Western Collaborative Group’ study what were the statistics of
heart attacks
recurring heart attacks
& fatal heart attacks
For personality types A&B?
Type A Type B
Heart attacks 12.8% 6%
Recurring
Heart attacks 2.6% 0.8%
Fatal Heart
attacks 2.7% 1.1%
How many Californian men were used in the Friedman and Rosenman (1974) ‘Western Collaborative Group’ study? How old were they?
3200
between 39 and 59
What conclusions can be drawn from the Friedman and Rosenman (1974) ‘Western Collaborative Group’ study
The Type A behaviour pattern increases vulnerability to heart disease
– Behaviour modification programmes to reduce Type A behaviour should result in a reduced risk of heart disease
Evaluate the Friedman and Rosenman (1974) ‘Western Collaborative Group’ study
Although some aspects of lifestyles were controlled for, there may have been other variables that could have affected vulnerability to heart disease, such as elements of hardiness (the hardy personality)
– This was not an experimental study, so cause and effect cannot be assumed; other studies have
failed to show a relationship between Type A behaviour patterns and heart disease
Whose research can be used to contradict the findings of the Friedman and Rosenman (1974) ‘Western Collaborative Group’ study?
Ragland and Brand (1988)
What research can be used to contradict the findings of the Friedman and Rosenman (1974) ‘Western Collaborative Group’ study?
Ragland and Brand (1988) carried out a follow up study of the Western Collaborative Group Participants in 1982-1983, 22 years after the start of the study.
Results – They found that 214 (approx. 15% of the men) had died of CHD
This study confirmed the importance of CHD risk factors (e.g. age, smoking, high blood pressure) but found little evidence of a relationship between Type A behaviours and mortality, thus challenging the earlier conclusions that Type A personality was a significant risk factor of CHD mortality.
In the Ragland and Brand 1988 study, what percentage of the participants had subsequently dies of CHD
15%