Personal Relationships Flashcards

1
Q

Biological assumption of formation of relationships

A

Humans are passive organisms influenced by physiological processes (evolutionary theory: ensure survival of species via reproduction)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Cognitive assumption on the formation of relationships

A

Humans actively interpret the world in order to make decisions (perhaps mediators for biological determinants)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sociocultural assumption of formation of relationships

A

Societal expectations may influence decisions to form a relationship (again, perhaps a mediator of biological determinants)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Helen Fisher Aim

A

Investigate neural mechanisms associated with romantic love

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Helen Fisher Procedure

A

Triangulated Lab: 1. Semi-structured interview to establish duration & intensity of love. 2. Questionnaire measuring traits associated with romantic love. 3. fMRI of brain activity while looking at a picture of beloved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Helen Fisher Findings

A

Increased activity of areas with high levels of dopamine neurons. Correlation between measured intensity of love and the brains reward circuitry activation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Helen Fisher Conclusion

A

Love is a motivation system to enable reproduction. Explains why attraction is linked to increased energy, focused attention, obsessive following, and more.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Altman & Taylor Proposed Theory

A

Social Penetration Theory: Relationships form based on gradual disclosure and reciprocal trust that has been established

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Stages of Disclosure

A
  1. Orientation
  2. Exploratory
  3. Affective
  4. Stable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Orientation

A

Simple information that does not reveal vulnerability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Exploratory

A

Feelings and opinions but still rather “safe”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Affective

A

Private and personal information involving physical intimacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Stable

A

Honesty and vulnerability can be openly shared as trust has been established

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Social Penetration Theory Meta-analysis Findings

A
  1. People who disclose intimate information about themselves are more liked than those who don’t
  2. People tend to disclose more personal information to those they like
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evaluation of Social Penetration Theory

A

Disclosure may play a role in establishing and maintaining a relationship. However, difficult to determine direction of causality. Culturally bias towards western women. Overly simplistic as individuals may have different patterns of disclosure. Reductionist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Bradbury & Fincham Aim

A

Investigate causal attributions and responsibility attributions present in happy marriages

17
Q

Bradbury & Fincham Procedure

A

Observation: identification of patterns of communication
Questionnaire: marital satisfaction and problems in relationship
Interview: cause, responsibility, & solution of the problem

18
Q

Bradbury & Fincham Findings

A

Correlation between lower level of marital satisfaction and more frequent distress maintaining patterns of communication (blame, hostility, etc.)

19
Q

Bradbury & Fincham Conclusion

A

Happy relationships engage in enhancing patterns of communication when there is a disagreement

20
Q

Gottman et al Aim

A

Investigate the role of couple interaction / communication on relationship stability

21
Q

Gottman et al Procedure

A

Longitudinal study: Interview with couples about relationship while they’re attached to electrodes measuring blood flow, heart rate, and sweat. Follow-up 6 years later

22
Q

Gottman et al Findings

A

Couples who had quicker heart rates, activated sweat glands, and faster blood flow during interview had broken up or were chronically unhappy 6 years later. Couples who were still together show low physiological arousal, having created a climate of trust & connection

23
Q

Gottman et al Conclusion & Proposed Theory

A

The 4 Horsemen of Apocalypse
- Contempt: hostile humor to make partner feel inferior
- Criticism: blaming, attacking or insulting partners character
- Defensiveness: avoiding responsibilities and making excuses
- Stonewalling: actively disengaging from conversations

24
Q

Hatfield Aim

A

Investigate whether infidelity occurred due to imbalance in relationships

25
Q

Hatfield Procedure

A

Correlational Questionnaire: asked US couples about partner traits, nature of relationship, and extramarital affairs

26
Q

Hatfield Findings

A

Those who felt under-benefited had extramarital sex sooner than those who felt fairly treated. Unbalanced individuals were least likely to think relationship would still be intact in the future.

27
Q

Hatfield Conclusion & Equity Theory

A

Individuals estimating a comparable ratio of what is contributed and what is received leads to a successful relationship

28
Q

Equity Theory Evaluation

A

Overlooks role of emotions in relationships. Culturally biased towards individualistic societies. Diffficult to quantify costs and rewards of a relationship.

29
Q

Who proposed that love is a motivation system

A

Helen Fisher

30
Q

Who proposed Social Penetration Theory

A

Altman & Taylor

31
Q

Who proposed enhancing / distress maintaining patterns of communication

A

Brandbury & Fincham

32
Q

Who proposed 4 horsemen of Apocalypse Theory

A

Gottman et al.

33
Q

Who proposed Equity Theory

A

Hatfield

34
Q

What is the Halo Effect

A

Tendency for an impression created in one area to influence opinion in another area

35
Q

Dion Aim

A

Investigate whether physically attractive people, both male and female, are assumed to possess more socially desirable personality traits than unattractive people

36
Q

Dion Procedure

A

Participants received 3 photos of someone their age that could be considered physically attractive, moderately attractive, and unattractive. They were asked to rate the people on 27 personality traits and determine which person would most likely experience overall happiness and success.

37
Q

Dion findings

A

Attractive individuals were predicted to be significantly happier, successful, and have more positive personality traits

38
Q

Dion Conclusion

A

Our cognitive process of thinking and decision making to form a relationship or not may be influenced by a person’s physical beauty, distorting judgement of their other qualities.