Personal Jurisdiction Flashcards

1
Q

Rule 4(k)

A

(1) (A): long-arm statute
(1) (B): 100-Mile Bulge Rule: joined under Rule 14/19 and served not more than 100 miles from place where summons issued.
(1) (C): Federal Statutory Provision
(2) : Alien Provision: claim under federal law against person with no PJ in any state = minimum contacts with U.S.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Traditional Bases for PJ

A

In-State Service: individual real person in state not by fraud
Waiver (voluntary appearance) or Consent (forum-selection clause)
Challenging party is the original plaintiff
Challenging party is individual real person who is state citizen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

In Rem, Quasi in Rem Type II

A

Shaffer v. Heitner

  • In rem = property means minimum contacts met
  • Quasi = property means regular, isolated contact
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

General Jurisdiction

A

Domicile, Incorporation, Headquarters (PPB)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Purposeful Availment

A

Taken advantage of the benefits and protections of the state. No purposeful availment based on unilateral actions by other parties (World-wide Volkswagen).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Intentional Torts

A

Calder Effects Test: (1) intentional tort (2) aimed at forum state (3) brunt of harm suffered in forum state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Contract-Plus Analysis

A

Step #1: does D have contractual relationship with forum resident?
Step #2: does that relationship constitute purposeful availment?
–place of negotiation, place of execution, place of performance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Stream of Commerce

A

Asahi O’Connor: D must have intent to serve forum state
Asahi Brennan: knowledge that product is being marketed in forum state is sufficient
Nicastro Kennedy: agrees with O’Connor. Still no majority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Internet Cases

A

Young v. New Haven Advocate:

  • 4th Circuit: direct electronic activity into forum state, with manifest intent of engaging with state (not enough to put info on the internet).
  • 7th Circuit: universal purposeful availment for internet.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Reasonableness Factors

A

(1) Burden on D: impact D’s ability to mount defense
(2) Forum State’s Interest: state policies at stake, state citizens involved
(3) P’s Interest in Relief: P from forum state
(4) Efficiency: witnesses and evidence in forum state
(5) Shared States’ Interest: other states care more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly