Personal Investigation 1 Flashcards
What is the aim of PI 1?
To find out if whether there will be a change in participants attitude to helping behaviour after watching a video clip on helping behaviour
Why is the hypothesis non-directional in PI 1? (Justification)
Previous research that has been undertaken in attitudes towards helping behaviour has displayed conflicting or inconsistent findings.
State the experimental hypothesis for PI 1.
There will be a difference in participants scores on Nickell’s scale before and after watching video clip on helping behaviour.
State the null hypothesis for PI 1?
There will be no difference in participants scores on Nickell’s scale before and after watching a video clip on helping behaviour, any difference will be due to chance.
State the independent variable.
Before clip and watching helping behaviour and after clip watched.
State the dependant variable
Score measures on Nickell’s attitude to helping in condition A and condition B
Confounding variable
- Isolation may have affected some participants-lack of motivation
- Some may have previously seen the video- less emotional impact
- Some may be naturally less helpful
Extraneous variables
- Having to remain in year/class bubbles due to COVID-19 Ps were not allowed to move around school and therefore not gaining any influence from other year groups
- Time of day- experiment took place before lunch meaning Ps would have been hungry, less engaged
Methodology: 1. what type of experiment? 2. What experimental design
- Lab experiment as it allows us to measure cause and effect, high internal validity, manipulation of variables and allows full replication
- Repeated measures as matched pairs would have taken too much time in current situation (Covid-19) and we needed participants to complete both conditions (control and experimental) for valid comparison
Sample: target population, sampling method
Newport night student from one form class aged 11-12, opportunity sample as it’s cost effective and less time consuming than random. However inevitably bias as the sample is drawn from a specific sub group (students), cannot be generalised, not as representative as random.
Descriptive statistic
Median as it’s appropriate for ordinal data and not affected by extreme scores (mean is) but is not as representative as mean as exact values are not reflected in median.
Graphical representation
Bar chart - represents non continuous data
Inferential statistics and statistical results
Wilcoxon as data is ordinal, design is repeated measures and is a test of difference.
Observed value= 83 critical value= 81 N= 24, accept null reject experimental as level of significance= p
3 Findings
- P’s generally had a higher score in condition B rather than A
- The range in both conditions was 49
- The median score for condition A was 69 and condition B 69.5
Conclusions
The observed value (83) was greater than the critical value (81) therefore significance is not shown. Null hypothesis rejected alternative rejected. No difference was found on P’s score on NS before and after watching clip