Personal Deductions, Exemptions, and Credits Flashcards

1
Q

What does it take for a deduction to be above the line? What section is this under?

A

Section 62: for business expenses by employer, not employee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

This year Matthew incurs 10k of medical expenses and his AGI is 100k. How much
of the medical expenses may he deduct under § 213(a)?

A

He can deduct any above 7.5%, so 2,500 in this case. Most people don’t though, since they take the standard deduction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Under what section is medical expenses dealt with?

A

213

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Is the 213 deduction above or below the line?

A

Below the line

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the two main requirements for a medical expense under 213?

A
  1. Can only deduct that past 7.5% of income
  2. Must be for medical care; 231(d)(1)(A): for the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, or for the purpose of affecting any structure or function of the body
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What about employer-provided coverage under an accident or health plan? What section?

A

106: says they are not income

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was Taylor v. Commissioner?

A

It dealt with the issue of what constitutes as medical care under 213. Essentially, Taylor had an allergy that disabled him from mowing his law. The court held that he could not deduct the cost of paying someone to mow his lawn under 213.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was OCHS v. Commissioner?

A

Following the lower court’s decision that expenses incurred by petitioner taxpayer in sending his children to day and boarding school were non-deductible family expenses pursuant to 26 U.S.C.S. § 24(a)(1), petitioner sought review. Petitioner argued that the purpose in sending the children to boarding school was to alleviate his wife’s pain and suffering in caring for the children by reason of her inability to speak above a whisper and to prevent a recurrence of cancer. Petitioner argued that these expenses were therefore medical expenses, entitling him to a deduction. The court rejected petitioner’s argument and affirmed the decision. The court held that while it had no reason to doubt the good faith and truthfulness of petitioner and his reasons for incurring the expenses, the expenses incurred in sending the children to boarding school were nevertheless not deductible as medical expenses pursuant to the provisions of 26 U.S.C.S. § 23(x). The court held that the expenses were made necessary by the loss of the wife’s services and that family expenditures could not be converted into deductible medical expenses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are some policy rationales for giving medical deductions under 213? (4)

A

(i) Amounts spent for extraordinary medical expenses do not provide consumption in the ordinary sense and therefore are simply not part of income.
(ii) Individuals who pay their own medical costs relieve the government of an expense that it would otherwise be obliged to bear.
(iii) The deduction is a proper encouragement to people to take good care of themselves; it is a useful subsidy for medical care.
(iv) In many instances, an injury or illness stems from work (e.g., a professional athlete’s bad knee) or interferes with the ability to work (e.g., a truck driver’s bad back), so the cost of medical care should be regarded as a cost of producing income.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why is employer provided healthcare so heavily favored?

A

Because the income is excluded for employees (under 106) AND the employers get a deduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does medical expenses remind one of Benaglia?

A

Because there is clearly a consumption element to each of the expenses, and yet they are wholly deductible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Taxpayers A, B, and C each have AGI for the current taxable year of 100k. Taxpayer A donates 50k to charity. Taxpayer B suffers a 50k casualty loss on property with a basis of 100k. Taxpayer C incurs 50k in medical expenses. How much may each deduct?

A

A: 50k (up to 50% of his AIG, which is 100k, so 50k); no floor

B: 39.9k = 50k - 100 (165(h)(1)) - 10k (165(h)(2) - that exceeds 10% of AGI); a floor of 10%

C: past 7.5% of income, so 50k-7.5k = 42.5k; a floor of 7.5%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Sam donates $100 to his favorite charity and the charity sends him a shirt with a FMV of $10. Sam hates the shirt and makes his dog wear it. His dog also hates it. (It is not, after all, for a dog.) What is the amount of Sam’s charitable contribution?

A

His contribution is $90

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Laura is at an auction for a charitable organization. All of the items in the auction were donated to the organization. Laura bids $100 for a bottle of wine, which sells at a store for $80. Laura wins the bottle. How much can Laura deduct?

A

$20

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Is the charitable contribution under 170 above or below the line?

A

below the line - itemized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the controversial charities?

A

The 501(c)(4)’s like Karl Rove’s Crossroads GPS; also includes NRA, Sierra Club

501(c)(5)(27): PACs and SuperPACs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Where are the donee rules in charitable contributions?

A

501

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What does 501(a) say?

A

If it fits under 501(c), then it doesn’t have to pay income tax. 501(c)(3), for example, mirrors the 170 rule, so it will include anything you get a charitable deduction for. But there are more organizations than those, listed in 501(c)(4), and (c)(5)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Can 501(c)(4) and (c)(5) organizations campaign? Why?

A

Yes, because the restriction only applies to (c)(3) ones, that can get deductible donations

20
Q

Which is more valuable: 170 deductions or 501 exclusions?

A

Most people say 170 deductions, because these organizations aren’t for profit, so exclusion of income isn’t really a question since they are using all their income

21
Q

What is the important exception to 501(a)? How do 501’s get around this? What about the UCLA bookstore? Revenue from PAC12 TV?

A

When a 501 organization practices in profit oriented stuff outside of their charitable purposes (getting unrelated business income - UBIT), that part isn’t tax exempt; often 501’s have a separate organization they can do this in, so they don’t get audited.

That stuff is nontaxable, so long as it’s for the convenience of the members of the 501; even further, revenue from TV is not included.

Not UBIT if just a minority stake. UBIT if an active manager in some not-for-convenience stake investments.

22
Q

What are the limitations on the 170 deductions?

A
  1. 50% or 30% of AGI (most are 50%)
  2. Corporations can’t deduct more than 10% of taxable income. If a taxpayer contributed more than his/her yearly income, could carry it over.
23
Q

What happened in Bob Jones v. Commissioner? What’s one problem with the decision?

A

It was about whether Bob Jones University served a public purpose, which is required for income exclusion under 501(c)(3). The court held that Bob Jones was not in furthering of a public purpose. Discrimination in education is contrary to public policy. Board v. Brown matters because that is about federal subsidy, which shows that the USSC is willing to talk about tax expenditure!

The IRS is suddenly in the position of determining is for and against public policy. Fortunately, they haven’t used this power much at all.

Based on the “national policy to discourage racial discrimination in education,” the IRS ruled that a private school not having a racially nondiscriminatory policy as to students was not charitable within the common law concepts reflected in §§ 170 and 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. The application of the IRS construction of these provisions to petitioners, two private schools with racially discriminatory admissions policies, was affirmed, as private schools maintaining racially discriminatory admissions policies violated clearly declared federal policy and must be denied tax benefits flowing from qualification under § 501(c)(3). Entitlement to tax exemption depended on meeting certain common-law standards of charity. An institution seeking tax exempt status must serve a public purpose and not be contrary to established public policy. To warrant exemption under § 501(c)(3), an institution must fall within a category specified in that section and must demonstrably serve and be in harmony with the public interest. The institution’s purpose must not be so at odds with the common community conscience as to undermine any public benefit that might otherwise be conferred.

24
Q

Why is the charitable contribution deduction often characterized as involving a parallel subsidy from the government?

A

Because if you donate $100, you are saving $35 on taxes, and spending $65 without any benefit. So you are directing $35 dollars of government spending (40-50 billion dollars a year). Further, all taxpayers are donating when you’re donating.

25
Q

What are some rationales for the charitable contribution deduction?

A
  1. Encourage giving
  2. More efficient way than having the government do it
  3. Not consumption
  4. Voting by donating
  5. Combats view that federal spending is majoritarian (i.e., not directed towards benefit of minorities)
26
Q

What happens when you contribute long term (not short term) capital property to a charitable organization? Are there limits on these contributions?

A

You can deduct the full FMV; no basis is used.

Yes, 30 percent of adjusted gross income, or 20 percent if the gift is to a private foundation or for the use of the charitable organization.

27
Q

What was Ottawa Silica v. US? What’s the main principle?

A

A subsantial private benefit leads to a denial of deduction under 170

Affirming, the court first noted that § 170 allowed a charitable contribution deduction if the gift was made for exclusively public purposes. The taxpayer argued that it received only incidental benefits in return for its gift. The court held that the taxpayer derived benefits from the transfer that were substantial enough to provide it with a quid pro quo for the transfer and thus effectively destroyed the charitable nature of the transfer. The court opined that the taxpayer knew that the school construction would substantially benefit the surrounding land, that it made the gift expecting its remaining property to increase in value, and that the expected receipt of these benefits at least partially prompted the gift. Next, the taxpayer argued that it was not allowed a full percentage depletion deduction and that it was not allowed a full consolidated net operating loss deduction. The court held that its jurisdiction did not extend to those aspects of the taxpayer’s claims that were not adequately raised in the taxpayer’s claims for refund. Further, the rule of substantial variance precluded the exercise of jurisdiction over issues not first raised in the claim for a refund.

28
Q

Someone gets stock worth $100, which she has held for five years, in which she has a basis of $50? For six months?

A

Long term (more than a year): deduction = FMV, so $100

Short term: Basis, so $50

29
Q

What if Laura gives $100 long term stock with a basis of $50 to charity, and gets an $80 bottle of wine. What tax consequences? (this is a part charitable contribution/part sale: review)

A

Has to pay taxes on gain: so 1011(b) says split into sale and contribution portion; can use proportional portion for it.

80 stock for wine (80% of 50 = 40 basis)
20 stock of contribution

40 in gain
20 of deduction

30
Q

Beth borrows $1000 to make an investment that yields a 20% return ($200), but has 10% ($100) of interest to pay on the loan. Is that interest deductible? What sections? What if she borrows the money to go to Cabo?

A

If it’s personal interest, no (all interest is deductible, unless it’s personal - according to 163(a) and 163(h) respectively)

Then not for investment or trade or business; consumption

So, interest is deductible, because it’s an investment; net income of $100

31
Q

What kinds of personal interest are deductible? Under what section?

A

163(h)(2) says that when interest is connected to a trade or business or to investment, then it’s deductible; just parallels 162 and 212

32
Q

What is qualified residence interest? What section? Why is it important? Is there a limitation on the amount you can borrow and not pay interest?

A

163(h)(2)(d), 163(h)(3):

acquisition indebtedness

OR

33
Q

What is acquisition indebtedness? What section?

A

indebtedness incurred in acquiring, constructing, or improving a qualified residence

163(h)(3)((B)

34
Q

What is home equity indebtedness? What section?

A
any indebtedness (other than acquisition indebtedness) secured by a qualified residence.  The  amount of home  equity indebtedness with  respect 
to which a deduction is allowed is limited to the  lesser of $100,000 or the fair market value of the  residence minus the amount of any outstanding  acquisition indebtedness. 

163(h)(3)(C)

35
Q

if I took a loan out for a 2 million dollar house, for 2 million, what can I deduct? What section is this?

A

You can deduct half of your interest payments, because only interest on loans up to 1 million

163(h)(3)((B)(ii)

36
Q

Jennifer has $50,000 in a savings account. She uses the $50,000 to buy a Mercedes and the next day borrows $50,000 to finance the purchase of a fast-food franchise that she intends to operate. Will the interest on the $50,000 loan be deductible?

A

Yes: 163(h)(2)(A); trade or business

37
Q

Barbara owns her personal residence free and clear. Its value is $100,000. She borrows $50,000 on a “home equity” loan, secured by the residence.

(a) She uses the proceeds to buy a Mercedes. Is the interest deductible? Under what Code section?
(b) She uses the proceeds instead to buy a tax-exempt bond. Is the interest deductible? See §265(a)(2), § 163(h)(2)(D), § 163(a).
(c) She uses the proceeds of the loan to buy taxable bonds, but at the time she holds $50,000 of tax-exempt bonds. Is the interest deductible?

A

(a) Yes: 163(h)(2)(D): qualified residence interest in the form of home equity indebtedness
(b) No: can’t borrow to buy tax exempt bonds and get a deduction; tax arbitrage
(c) No: 265(a)(2) takes this out too

38
Q

Joe has a portfolio of stocks and bonds worth $200,000. The annual income from the portfolio is $12,000. Joe borrows $50,000 on a margin loan and uses the proceeds to buy a Mercedes. Since the proceeds are used to buy the Mercedes, the interest on the loan is personal interest. See Regs. § 1.163-8T (c) (1). What might he do to achieve a better tax result?

A

Sell 50k of stocks and bonds, buy the car with the proceeds, loan to rebuy those stocks, can deduct the interest, but should wait 30 days to rebuy the stocks, and hopefully sell stocks with loss on them, so no taxes (plus loss)

39
Q

Which of the 163 deductions are above the line?

A
  1. Trade or business

2. Education loans

40
Q

Is there a personal vs. business distinction in 164?

A

No: all state taxes are deductible

41
Q

Which states don’t have state income tax? (4)

A

FL, TX, WA, TN

42
Q

Are state taxes consumptive?

A

Largely

  1. Could move to states with no taxes (not a great argument)
  2. They provide you services (but then all taxes are consumptive)
  3. Some state and local taxes are voluntary
43
Q

What do some people is bad about 164?

A

Gives states with high income tax people more subsidies than other states, which is counter-intuitive

44
Q

What is section 221?

A

It allows a deduction for interest on indebtedness used to pay higher education expenses of the taxpayer, the taxpayer’s spouse, or a dependent of the taxpayer. The maximum amount deductible is $2,500. The deduction is phased out for taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income in excess of $50,000 ($100,000 in the case of a joint return), adjusted annually for inflation since 2002.

45
Q

What is interesting about itemized deductions? What section is this?

A

There is a floor of ?%

46
Q

What is section 151?

A

About personal and dependency exemptions

47
Q

What is EITC?

A

Earned income tax credit; gives you income if you don’t make much income, so that you keep working, phase in and phase out; it’s a refundable credit (get a check if you don’t use it all)

Wage subsidy or negative income tax