- Defendant did not take reasonable steps to ensure that Ring cameras are a secure means to monitor private areas of consumers’ homes. 58. Therefore, Defendant’s representations as set forth in Paragraph 56 are false or misleading and constitute deceptive acts or practices in violation of Section 5(a) - Defendant’s actions have caused, cause, or are likely to cause substantial injury to consumers that consumers cannot reasonably avoid themselves and that is not outweighed by countervailing benefits to consumers or competition. Therefore, Defendant’s acts or practices as set forth in Paragraph 59 constitute unfair acts or practices in violation of Section 5.

Personal Data and AI Flashcards by Andrea M

FTC v Ring

Defendant did not take reasonable steps to ensure that Ring cameras are a secure means to monitor private areas of consumers’ homes. 58. Therefore, Defendant’s representations as set forth in Paragraph 56 are false or misleading and constitute deceptive acts or practices in violation of Section 5(a)
Defendant’s actions have caused, cause, or are likely to cause substantial injury to consumers that consumers cannot reasonably avoid themselves and that is not outweighed by countervailing benefits to consumers or competition. Therefore, Defendant’s acts or practices as set forth in Paragraph 59 constitute unfair acts or practices in violation of Section 5.

How well did you know this?

Not at all

Perfectly