Marital Property Flashcards
Community Property-rights during marriage
- Property acquired during the marriage is held
jointly and considered to be property of both
spouses - Property acquired before marriage is deemed
separate
Community Property- Rights at divorce
- Property (starting at the date of marriage) is
divided evenly by the court. - The separate property owned by A before the
marriage remains A’s separate property
Community Property- Rights at death
- Decedent can devise their share of community
and separate property at death - Surviving spouse holds the remaining
property
Separate Property- Rights during the marriage
-Property owned by spouse who brought it to marriage
* B keeps B’s property from before and during the
marriage
* A keeps A’s property from before and during the
marriage
Separate Property- Rights at Divorce
- Equitable distribution of the property of the property
owned by each spouse during the marriage. - The separate property owned by A before the marriage
remains A’s separate property.
Separate Property- Rights at death
If A died while married to B, B could
* Take A’s property as directed by her will; or
* Receive a “forced share” of the decedent’s property
(A dies, devising all of her property to Daughter. B
can claim a forced share of A’s property. B will get
1/3 in many jurisdictions
Tenancy by Entirety- Creation
Grantor conveys property to a married couple. They
hold as tenants by the entirety.
* 25 states & DC recognize. Not Washington state.
Tenancy by Entirety- Termination
Death, divorce, or agreement of both spouses
Tenancy by Entirety- Nature of Property Right
Each tenant has the right of survivorship
* Each tenant has the right to use the entire property
* Tenant cannot convey or devise his/her/their interests
(Question: Can a creditor reach the assets of tenancy
by the entirety?)
Can creditors go against spouse?
- Whether the judgment against Kokichi was valid against his wife as well, as a tenant of the tenancy by
the entirety
Judgment against Kokichi was not valid against his wife; “an estate by the entirety is not
subject to the claims of the creditors of one of the spouses during their joint lives”; the
conveyance was not in fraud of Kokichi’s judgment creditors.
Gazvoda v Wright (unmarried couple)
Facts: Unmarried couple of 16 years with one child. Sabrina also worked building up
Bruce’s business valued at more than $1M. Sabrina sought $720K but the trial
court granted $250K. Bruce appealed.
Reasoning: Unjust enrichment theory
◦ Bruce substantially benefited from the services that Sabrina provided.
◦ Bruce and Sabrina referred to the property acquired during their cohabitation
as “ours”
Obergefell v Hodges
- used due process clause of 14th amendment (liberties extend to personal identity and beliefs) (equal protection under the law)
- right to personal choice is inherent to autonomy