periodontal assessment and pathogenesis Flashcards
Why do we need a rationale for treatment?
To establish the underlying reason for treatment.
What is Webster’s definition of rationale?
“The underlying reason.”
Specific Knowledge
- Understand the etiology of
periodontal diseases - Determine therapeutic
goals relative to etiology - Understand effects of therapies on the periodontium
What should a rationale for treatment be based on?
- Etiology
- Clinical evidence of efficacy
- Long-term follow-up
Are all periodontal diseases caused by the same problem?
No
What are the key etiologic considerations for periodontal diseases?
- Bacterial
- Host factors
- Systemic diseases
- Genetic factors
- Local factors
What is the primary therapeutic goal in periodontal treatment?
To alter or eliminate the microbial etiology and contributing risk factors.
What does achieving the therapeutic goal aim to do?
Arrest the progression of the disease.
What is the second therapeutic goal in periodontal treatment?
Preserve the dentition in a state of health, comfort, and function with appropriate esthetics.
What is the third therapeutic goal in periodontal treatment?
Prevent the recurrence of periodontitis.
What components are included in a periodontal assessment?
- Medical/dental history
- Clinical assessment
- Radiographic assessment
- Laboratory examinations
What are the patient-related factors influencing periodontal treatment goals?
- Systemic health
- Age
- Compliance
- Therapeutic preferences
- Ability to control plaque
What is the fourth therapeutic goal in periodontal treatment?
Attempt regeneration of the periodontal attachment apparatus, where indicated.
What additional factors influence periodontal treatment goals?
- Diagnosis
- Prognosis
- Clinician’s skill
- Post-treatment responses
What does the clinical assessment include?
- Visual exam
- Periodontal charting
What are the key aspects of medical/dental history in periodontal assessment?
Identifying risk factors
What factors affect the accuracy of periodontal probing?
- Degree of gingival inflammation
- Probing force
- Location of site and probe placement
- Examiner variation
- Repeatability varies with patient
- More variation for deeper pockets
What are the components of clinical assessment in periodontal evaluation?
- Plaque
- Inflammation
- Bleeding
- Exudate
- Pocket depth
- Attachment loss
- Recession
- Mobility
- Furcation involvement
What study assessed the reliability of attachment loss measurements in a longitudinal clinical trial?
Best, AM, Burmeister, JA, Gunsolley JC, Brooks, CN and
Schenkein, HA. Reliability of attachment loss measurements in
a longitudinal clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 1990;17:564-569.
What methods were used to assess the reliability of CAL measurements in the study by Best et al. (1990)?
- 16 subjects
- Calibration trials for examiners
- Comparison of 2 or 3 examiners at a time
- 52 separate occasions
- Minimal time between calibration measures
What were the results for the reliability of CAL measurements in the study by Best et al. (1990)?
- Exact agreement: 44.3%
- Agreement within 1 mm: 40.9%
- Agreement within 2 mm: 11.5%
- Total agreement: 96.7%
What study evaluated the effects of plaque control and root debridement using subjective criteria and probing attachment loss?
Rik Vanooteghem, L. H. Hutchens, Gerald Bowers, et al. Subjective
criteria and probing attachment loss to evaluate the effects of plaque
control and root debridement. 1990; 17(8): 580-587.
What was the purpose of the study by Vanooteghem et al. (1990) on subjective criteria and attachment loss?
To determine if expert clinicians can predict which periodontal sites will respond to periodontal treatment.
What were the results of the study by Vanooteghem et al. (1990) on subjective criteria and attachment loss at 24 months?
- Plaque score reduced from 72% to 30%
- Bleeding reduced from 84% to 50%
- Suppuration reduced from 10% to <1%
- 60 sites (7% of the sites) with an initial PD of 4mm or more progressed (got worse).
What were the results for questionable sites at baseline in the study by Vanooteghem et al. (1990)?
- 170 questionable sites
- PPV: 15%
- Sensitivity: 42%
What were the results for questionable sites at 3 months in the study by Vanooteghem et al. (1990)?
- 145 questionable sites
- PPV: 20%
- Sensitivity: 48%
What were the results for questionable sites at 12 months in the study by Vanooteghem et al. (1990)?
- 130 questionable sites
- PPV: 22%
- Sensitivity: 47%