Performance, Modification, and Excuse Flashcards

1
Q

UCC: seller’s general performance obligation

A

transfer and deliver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

UCC: buyer’s general performance obligation

A

inspect goods

tender payment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

S obligated to put goods in the possession of a carrier, provide B with docs needed to get them, notify B that they’ve been shipped

A

shipment K
presumed
risk ships to B when the goods are delivered to the carrier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

S agreed to tender the goods at a particular place

A

destination K

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

FOB

A

free on board: FOB point is the delivery point

the place where the risk transfers from S to B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

FAS

A

free alongside

risk shifts to B when the goods are delivered at the destination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

if goods are held by a bailee to be delivered w/o being moved, risk passes to B when

A
  • B receives negot doc covering the goods
  • bailee acknowledges B’s rt to possess the goods
  • B rec nonnegot doc of title or other direction to deliver goods to B, obce B has had a reasonable time to present the doc or direction to the bailee
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

in not a shipment case, where S is a merchant, risk of loss passes to B when

A

B receives (takes phys possession of) the goods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

in not a shipment K, where S is not a merchant, risk of loss passes to B

A

upon tender of delivery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

if the seller breaches the K by making nonconforming tender or delivery, S keeps risk until

A

cure or acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Modification: CL

A

preexisting duty rule

no modification if no consideration being offered for the mod

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

a promise to increase comp under an existing K is enforceable if

A

as a mutual mod

  • both parties agree to a performance that’s diff from the one originally promised
  • diff in performance is not a mere pretense
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Where a promise of increased compensation is given in exchange for a performance, and that performance is rendered substantially more burdensome than anticipated by the parties when they entered the K,

A

unforseen circ= preexisting duty rule doesn’t apply

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

when is mod permitted under the UCC

A

no consideration needed

good faith test: can[‘t be a pretext to hide a bad faith change in terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

when there’s a “no oral modifications” clause in a K, CL & UCC?

A

CL: used to be totally invalid, cts will prob enforce them where a party has reasonably relied on the moral mod

UCC: presumptively valid , but may be enforceable if the disadvantaged party relies on the mod

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

unilateral mistake

A

doesn’t matter, unless other party had reason to know or it’s cause of a clerical error

17
Q

mutual mistake

A

voidable by the disadvantaged party where

  • mistaken fact is essential to the K
  • both parties were mistaken
  • disadvantaged party didnt bear the risk of mistake under the K
18
Q

doctrine of impossibility requires

A

objectively impossible performance

occurrence of contingency not known to the parties at the time of contracting

19
Q

doctrine of impracticability requires

A

caused by some unforeseen contingency
risk was neither assumed nor allocated by the parties
increase in cost of performance qould be far beyond what either party anticipated

20
Q

frustration of purpose requires

A

party’s princ purpose in entering the K is frustrated
substantial frustration
non-occurrence of the event precipitating frustration was a basic assumption of the K

21
Q

recission- consideration for the change is

A

discharge of the other’s duties

22
Q

accord and satisfaction

A

accord: K under which the obligee promises to accept substituted performance in satisfaction of the obligor’s original duty
- satisfaction: performance of the accord
- consideration required
- less $ only ok if there’s a GF dispute as to the amnt owed

23
Q

if 1 party anticipatorily repudiates, the other party can

A

imemdiately treat it as a breach, entitled to same rights and remedies. Can immediately cancel the K OR bring an action for spec perf

24
Q

adequate assurance of performance: CL And UCC

A

UCC: in writing

  • other party can suspend his performance if no response within 30d; doesn’t provide reasonable assurance; suspension is commerically reasonable/ hasn’t received the agreed-upon return
  • failure to respond = breach

CL: oral comm or in writing
-same as above except for the 30d thing

25
Q

promissory condition

A

K conditioned on the occurrence of the promised perf by the other party
ex: publisher’s duty of payment expressly conditioned on B’s timely delivery of the manuscript.

26
Q

pure condition

A

K performance conditioned on the occurrence of events beyond the control of either party. ex “weather permitting”

27
Q

Order of performance: CL

A
  • if 1 party’s performance requires a period of time to be completed and the others does not, the performance over time is a condition to the other one
  • if they can be done simultaneously, then theperformances are treated as concurrent conditions of each other
28
Q

order of performance: CL

A

if it doesn’t say in the K, delivery & payment are treated as concurrent, so each perf is conditioned on the performance of the other

29
Q

CL: failure of express condition

A
  • discharges other party’s obligation
  • if no clear conditional lang, express cond may be established by trade usage, course of dealing, or course of performance
30
Q

CL: excuse of express condition

A
  • waiver: A (guy who would have been discharged from performing ) may waive the right to discharge and perform anyway.
  • -BF conduct: beneficiary can excuse, then other party’s performance becomes absolute (B getting financing is an exp cond, B fails to apply for financing. B has excused that cond and now has to perform)-

-ct may excuse condition to avoid forfeiture (will consider factors)

31
Q

CL: failure of implied conditions

A
  • material breach: aggreived party is free to walk away
  • substantial performance: aggreived party may still sue for damages to remedy the breach.
  • extent to which the aggreived party will be deprived of the benefit, which he reasonably expected under the terms of the K
  • extent to which the aggreived party can adequately be compensated via damages for the defective performance
  • extent to which the breaching party will suffer forfeiture if a material breach is found
  • extent to which the breach was willful or in bad faith
  • likelihood that the breaching party will cure his failure within a reasonable time and in a manner consistent w the reasonable purposes of the K
32
Q

CL: failure of implied condition: material breach

A

total breach

-partial breach: damages only based on the injured party’s remaining rights to performance (all non-material breaches)

33
Q

CL: failed condition: if it can’t be excused

A

division

quantum meruit

34
Q

UCC: S fails to make perfect tender: S’s options

A
  • reject the goods within a reasonable time, notify S
  • accept the goods after inspection and must pay K price but may seek damages. may revoke acceptance
  • reject part and accept part