Performance, Modification, and Excuse Flashcards
UCC: seller’s general performance obligation
transfer and deliver
UCC: buyer’s general performance obligation
inspect goods
tender payment
S obligated to put goods in the possession of a carrier, provide B with docs needed to get them, notify B that they’ve been shipped
shipment K
presumed
risk ships to B when the goods are delivered to the carrier
S agreed to tender the goods at a particular place
destination K
FOB
free on board: FOB point is the delivery point
the place where the risk transfers from S to B
FAS
free alongside
risk shifts to B when the goods are delivered at the destination
if goods are held by a bailee to be delivered w/o being moved, risk passes to B when
- B receives negot doc covering the goods
- bailee acknowledges B’s rt to possess the goods
- B rec nonnegot doc of title or other direction to deliver goods to B, obce B has had a reasonable time to present the doc or direction to the bailee
in not a shipment case, where S is a merchant, risk of loss passes to B when
B receives (takes phys possession of) the goods
in not a shipment K, where S is not a merchant, risk of loss passes to B
upon tender of delivery
if the seller breaches the K by making nonconforming tender or delivery, S keeps risk until
cure or acceptance
Modification: CL
preexisting duty rule
no modification if no consideration being offered for the mod
a promise to increase comp under an existing K is enforceable if
as a mutual mod
- both parties agree to a performance that’s diff from the one originally promised
- diff in performance is not a mere pretense
Where a promise of increased compensation is given in exchange for a performance, and that performance is rendered substantially more burdensome than anticipated by the parties when they entered the K,
unforseen circ= preexisting duty rule doesn’t apply
when is mod permitted under the UCC
no consideration needed
good faith test: can[‘t be a pretext to hide a bad faith change in terms
when there’s a “no oral modifications” clause in a K, CL & UCC?
CL: used to be totally invalid, cts will prob enforce them where a party has reasonably relied on the moral mod
UCC: presumptively valid , but may be enforceable if the disadvantaged party relies on the mod