Penal Code 10 Flashcards
“_____________” means force that is intended or known by the actor to cause, or in the manner of its use or intended use is capable of causing, death or serious bodily injury.
Deadly force
A person commits this offense if the person appears in a public place while intoxicated to the degree that the person may endanger the person or another.
PC 49.02.
PUBLIC INTOXICATION
A person commits this offense if the person knowingly possesses an open container in a passenger area of a motor vehicle that is located on a public highway, regardless of whether the vehicle is being operated or is stopped or parked.
Possession by a person of one or more open containers in a single criminal episode is a single offense.
* *POSSESSION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE IN MOTOR VEHICLE.**
“Public highway” means the entire width between and immediately adjacent to the boundary lines of any public road, street, highway, interstate, or other publicly maintained way if any part is open for public use for the purpose of motor vehicle travel. The term includes the right-of-way of a public highway.
A person commits this offense if the person is intoxicated while operating a motor vehicle in a public place.
- 04.
* *DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED**
A person commits this offense if the person is intoxicated while operating a motor vehicle in a public place; and the vehicle being operated by the person is occupied by a passenger who is younger than 15 years of age.
* *DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED WITH CHILD PASSENGER**
** 15 years of age **
A person commits this offense if the person is intoxicated while operating an aircraft.
(Not in 2020 study material)
49.05.
FLYING WHILE INTOXICATED
A person commits this offense if the person is intoxicated while operating a watercraft.
(Not in 2020 study material)
49.06.
BOATING WHILE INTOXICATED
A person commits this offense if the person is intoxicated while operating an amusement ride or while assembling a mobile amusement ride.
(Not in 2020 study material)
49.065.
ASSEMBLING OR OPERATING AN AMUSEMENT RIDE WHILE INTOXICATED
A person commits this offense if the person, by accident or mistake while operating an aircraft, watercraft, or amusement ride while intoxicated, or while operating a motor vehicle in a public place while intoxicated, by reason of that intoxication causes serious bodily injury to another; or as a result of assembling a mobile amusement ride while intoxicated causes serious bodily injury to another.
* *INTOXICATION ASSAULT**
In this section, “serious bodily injury” means injury that creates a substantial risk of death or that causes serious permanent disfigurement or protracted loss or impairment of the function of any bodily member or organ.
A person commits this offense if the person operates a motor vehicle in a public place, operates an aircraft, a watercraft, or an amusement ride, or assembles a mobile amusement ride and is intoxicated and by reason of that intoxication causes the death of another by accident or mistake.
- 08.
* INTOXICATION MANSLAUGHTER*
Sec. 49.11. For DWI RELATED OFFENSES:
PROOF OF MENTAL STATE UNNECESSARY. (a) Notwithstanding Section 6.02(b), proof of a culpable mental state _____ required for conviction of an offense under this chapter.
(Not in 2020 study material)
is not
(culpable mental states are : intentionally, knowingly, recklessly, or criminal negligence — ought to be aware…)
A person commits this offense if, without the effective consent of the owner:
He intentionally or knowingly damages or destroys the tangible property of the owner; He intentionally or knowingly tampers with the tangible property of the owner and causes pecuniary loss or substantial inconvenience to the owner or a third person; or He intentionally or knowingly makes markings, including inscriptions, slogans, drawings, or paintings, on the tangible property of the owner.
PC 28.03. CRIMINAL MISCHIEF
Felonies start at $2,500 or more
PENAL CODE
TITLE 2. GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY CHAPTER 9. JUSTIFICATION EXCLUDING CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
Sec.A9.02. JUSTIFICATION AS A DEFENSE.
It is a _________________ that the conduct in question is justified under this chapter.
defense to prosecution
i.e. Justifiable Homicides / Assaults
PENAL CODE
Sec. 9.02. JUSTIFICATION AS A DEFENSE.
It is a ____________ that the conduct in question is justified under this chapter.
defense to prosecution
PENAL CODE
Sec. 9.03. CONFINEMENT AS JUSTIFIABLE FORCE.
Confinement is justified when force is justified by this chapter if the actor takes reasonable measures to terminate the confinement as soon as he knows he safely can unless the person confined has been _________________.
arrested for an offense.
Sec. 9.04. THREATS AS JUSTIFIABLE FORCE.
The threat of force is justified when the use of force is justified by this chapter.
For purposes of this section, a threat to cause death or serious bodily injury by the production of a weapon or otherwise, as long as the actor’s purpose is limited to __________ that he will use deadly force if necessary, does not constitute the use of deadly force.
creating an apprehension
Sec. 9.05. RECKLESS INJURY OF INNOCENT THIRD PERSON.
Even though an actor is justified under this chapter in threatening or using force or deadly force against another, if in doing so he also recklessly injures or kills an innocent third person, the justification afforded by this chapter is ___________ in a prosecution for the reckless injury or killing of the innocent third person.
unavailable
Sec. 9.06. CIVIL REMEDIES UNAFFECTED.
The fact that conduct is justified under this chapter ________ abolish or impair any remedy for the conduct that is available in a civil suit.
does not
Sec. 9.21. PUBLIC DUTY.
(a) Except as qualified by Subsections (b) and (c), conduct is justified if the actor reasonably believes the conduct is required or authorized by law, by the judgment or order of a competent court or other governmental tribunal, or in the execution of legal process.
(b). The other sections of this chapter control when force is used against a person to:
protect persons (Subchapter C),
to protect property (Subchapter D),
for law enforcement (Subchapter E), or
by virtue of a special relationship (Subchapter F).
(c). The use of deadly force is not justified under this section unless the actor reasonably believes the deadly force is specifically required by statute or unless it occurs in the lawful conduct of war.
If deadly force is so justified, there is __________.
(d) . The justification afforded by this section is available if the actor reasonably believes:
(1) the court or governmental tribunal has jurisdiction or the process is lawful, even though the court or governmental tribunal lacks jurisdiction or the process is unlawful; or
(2) His conduct is required or authorized to assist a public servant in the performance of his official duty, even though the servant exceeds his lawful authority.
no duty to retreat before using it.
9.22. NECESSITY.
Conduct is justified if:
(1). The actor reasonably believes the conduct is
immediately necessary to ___________;
(2) . The desirability and urgency of avoiding the harm clearly outweigh, according to ordinary standards of reasonableness, the harm sought to be prevented by the law proscribing the conduct; and
(3) . A legislative purpose to exclude the justification claimed for the conduct does not otherwise plainly appear.
avoid imminent harm
Sec. 9.31. SELF-DEFENSE.
(a) Except as provided in Subsection (b),
a person is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to protect the actor against the other’s use or attempted use of unlawful force.
The actor’s belief that the force was immediately necessary as described by this subsection is presumed to be reasonable if the actor:
(1). Knew or had reason to believe that the person against whom the force was used:
(A). Unlawfully and with force entered, or was attempting to enter unlawfully and with force, the actor’s occupied **habitation, **vehicle, or **place of business or employment;
(B). unlawfully and with force removed, or was attempting to remove unlawfully and with force, the actor from the actor’s habitation, vehicle, or place of business or employment; or
(C). Was committing or attempting to commit **aggravated kidnapping, **murder, **sexual assault, **aggravated sexual assault, **robbery, or **aggravated robbery;
(2). Did not provoke the person against whom the force was used; and
(3). Was not otherwise engaged in criminal activity,
other than a Class C misdemeanor that is a violation of a law or ordinance regulating traffic at the time the force was used.
(b). The use of force against another is not justified: (1). In response to verbal provocation alone;
(2). To resist an arrest or search that the actor knows is being made by a peace officer, or by a person acting in a peace officer’s presence and at his direction, **even though the arrest or search is unlawful, *unless the resistance is justified under Subsection (c);
(3). If the actor consented to the exact force used or attempted by the other;
(4). If the actor provoked the other’s use or attempted use of unlawful force, unless:
(A). The actor abandons the encounter, or clearly communicates to the other his intent to do so reasonably believing he cannot safely abandon the encounter; and
(B). The other nevertheless continues or attempts
to use unlawful force against the actor; or
(5). If the actor sought an explanation from or discussion with the other person concerning the actor’s differences with the other person while the actor was:
(A). carrying a weapon in violation of Section
46.02; or
(B). possessing or transporting a weapon in violation of Section 46.05.
(c) . The use of force to resist an arrest or search is justified:
(1) . If, before the actor offers any resistance, the peace officer (or person acting at his direction) uses or attempts to use greater force than necessary to make the arrest or search; and
(2) . When and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to protect himself against the peace officer’s (or other person’s) use or attempted use of greater force than necessary.
(d) . The use of deadly force is not justified under this subchapter except as provided in Sections 9.32, 9.33, and 9.34.
(e) . A person who has a right to be present at the location where the force is used, who has not provoked the person against whom the force is used, and who is not engaged in criminal activity at the time the force is used is not required to retreat before using force as described by this section.
(f) . For purposes of Subsection (a), in determining whether an actor described by Subsection (e) reasonably believed that the use of force was necessary, a finder of fact may not consider whether the actor failed to retreat.
Sec. 9.32. DEADLY FORCE IN DEFENSE OF PERSON.
(a) A person is justified in using deadly force against another:
(1). If the actor would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.31; and
(2). when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:
(A). To protect the actor against the other’s use or attempted use of unlawful deadly force; or
(B). To prevent the other’s imminent commission of *aggravated kidnapping, *murder, *sexual assault, *aggravated sexual assault, *robbery, or *aggravated robbery.
(b). The actor’s belief under Subsection (a)(2) that the deadly force was immediately necessary as described by that subdivision is presumed to be reasonable if the actor:
(1). Knew or had reason to believe that the person against whom the deadly force was used:
(A). unlawfully and with force entered, or was attempting to enter unlawfully and with force, the actor’s occupied *habitation, *vehicle, or *place of business or employment;
(B). Unlawfully and with force removed, or was attempting to remove unlawfully and with force, the actor from the actor’s *habitation, *vehicle, or *place of business or employment; or
(C). Was committing or attempting to commit an
offense described by Subsection (a)(2)(B); aggravated kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, robbery, or
aggravated robbery
(2). Did not provoke the person against whom the force was used; and
(3). Was not otherwise engaged in criminal activity,
other than a Class C misdemeanor that is a violation of a law or ordinance regulating traffic at the time the force was used.
(c). A person who has a right to be present at the location where the deadly force is used, who has not provoked the person against whom the deadly force is used, and who is not engaged in criminal activity at the time the deadly force is used is not required to retreat before using deadly force as described by this section.
(d). For purposes of Subsection (a)(2), in determining whether an actor described by Subsection (c) reasonably believed that the use of deadly force was necessary, a finder of fact may not consider whether the actor failed to retreat
Sec. 9.33. DEFENSE OF THIRD PERSON.
A person is justified in using force or deadly force against another to protect a third person if:
(1) . Under the circumstances as the actor reasonably believes them to be, the actor would be justified under Section 9.31 or 9.32 in using force or deadly force to protect himself against the unlawful force or unlawful deadly force he reasonably believes to be threatening the third person he seeks to protect; and
(2) . The actor reasonably believes that his intervention is ___________ to protect the third person.
immediately necessary
Sec. 9.34. PROTECTION OF LIFE OR HEALTH.
(a) A person is justified in using force, but not deadly force, against another when and to the degree he reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent the other from committing suicide or inflicting serious bodily injury to himself.
(b). A person is justified in using both force and deadly force against another when and to the degree he reasonably believes the force or deadly force is immediately necessary to preserve the other’s life in an emergency.