Peds Difficult Airway Flashcards
difficult peds airway
-less common than adults
-prep for known difficult airway is different
-predictors for adults often do not apply to kids
-awake intubation not an option for kids
-shift from uncuffed to cuffed ETT
shift from fiberoptic scopes to various video laryngoscopes
peds airway tongue
- large in proportion to rest of oral cavity
- easy obstruction of infant airway
- oral airway can relieve the obstruction
peds airway differences
- narrow nasal passages
- increased salivary secretions
- larger tonsils and adenoids
- prominent occiput (use a dang shoulder roll)
peds position of the larynx
- higher (more cephalad) for neonates to 2 years of age
- larynx seems more anterior with acute angle
- C3-4 (adult it is C4-5)
- a straight laryngoscope blade more effectively lifts tongue from view
peds epiglottis
- adult epiglottis is flat and broad
- infant epiglottis is narrower, omega shaped, and angled away from the axis of the trachea
- often will obstruct view of the vocal cords
- more difficult to lift
peds vocal cords
- adult vocal cords axis is perpendicular to the trachea
- infant vocal cords have a lower (more caudad) attachment anteriorly vs posteriorly
- can lead to difficult intubation with the tip of the ETT held up at the anterior portion of the cords/folds
peds trachea
- shorter than the adult trachea
- infant 4-5 cm vs adult 10-12 cm
formula for ETT depth in kids
3x ETT size
usually a good rule of thumb but obvs still confirm in other ways
peds subglottic area
- narrowest portion of the child’s larynx is cricoid cartilage (until around age 8)
- when too large ETT is inserted, it may go through the cords but get stuck subglottic or in the cricoid region
- funnel vs elliptical shape (anterior posterior dimension is greater than the transverse)
what happens if a tight fitting tube is placed in a peds patient?
- compression of tracheal mucosa
- cause edema and reduce the luminal diameter and result in post extubation croup
- because the subglottic region in the infant is smaller than the adult, the same degree of airway edema will result in greater resistance to airflow in the infant (remember Poisoulle’s law)
peds airway evaluation
- mallampati (mouth opening) and mandible
- history of a syndrome/congenital anomalies or physical findings
- loose or missing teeth
- recent respiratory infections
- assess WOB
- snoring/noisy breathing at night
- baseline O2 sats
- asthma/smoking or second hand exposure
- global appearance
evidence of airway obstruction in peds
- tracheal tug
- paradoxical chest wall movement
- absence of movement in ambu bag
- no ETCO2
- most frequent mistake in peds is late recognition of upper airway obstruction
signs of inadequate sedation depth
- struggle
- breath hold
- partial airway obstruction
- rapid desat
signs of overly aggressive bag mask ventilation
- gastric insufflation
- reduced lung volumes
- increased risk of regurgitation
predicting the difficult peds airway
- highest incidence in infants (esp premies), craniofacial anomalies, and congenital cardiac anomalies
- may improve with age, with exception of Goldenhar and mucopolysaccharidoses
- mallampati correlates with cormack-lehane view
- observe child’s profile and look for recessed or smaller mandible, limited mouth opening, prominent dentition, facial asymmetry and cleft palate