Patient-centred communication and Outcomes Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Reasons for doctor communication breakdown

A

Not enough adequate information, underestimate amount of info patients want, spend most time on providing and not checking understanding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Reasons for patient communication breakdown

A

Doesn’t understand disease or treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ley (1982) factors affecting recall

A
Diagnosis vs instructions
Anxiety 
Patient factors (family) 
Perceived importance of statement
Number of statements
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Ley’s cognitive hypothesis of compliance (1982)

A

Understanding and memory = satisfaction= compliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Ley’s 7 recommendations to improve recall (some):

A

Instructions and advice, stress importance of it, simplify, framework, repeat info, specific advice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Doctor-patient communication research includes

A

Observing doctors do it, intervening to get patients more involved and intervention by health professionals to empower patients

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Observing how doctors do it (Law and Britten, 1995)

A

41 GPs, taped consultation.

Female better service from women GPs, men= both

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Intervening to get patients involved (Rotter, 1977)

A

294 patients, Baltimore health centre, African Americans. 100 E= prepare q’s. 100= discuss waiting room. Found: E more direct q’s and more likely to keep appointments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Intervening to get patients involved (Greenfield et al., 1985)

A

Patients prepared and were 2x more effective in obtaining info, more active role in medical decision making

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Intervening to get patients involved (Thompson et al., 1990)

A

Write 3 Q’s to doctor and asked more q’s, were significantly less anxious than control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Intervention by health professionals to empower patients (Kummonth et al., 1998)

A

Patient-centred training RCT= patients more satisfied with treatment and greater well being but gained more weight

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Patient and doctors hidden fears for consultations (Fischer and Ereaut, 2012)

A

Existential anxiety, entitlement anxiety and interaction anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Important role for health psychologists (2)

A

Help to develop feasible, effective interventions

Emphasise importance of patient perspective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Measuring health status: stats limitation

A

Not specific to group and questions are too broad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Measuring health status: bio markers

A

Many diseases where bio markers not available e.g MS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Measuring health status : QoL

A

Overall satisfaction with life, specific domains of life

17
Q

Health related QoL

A

Values, health concepts such as functioning affected by disease and treatment

18
Q

WHO factors of QoL

A

Physical health, psychological health, levels of independence, social relationships, relationship to environment, spirituality

19
Q

A generic measure of HRQoL

A

Medical Outcomes Study Short form (SF-36)

20
Q

Limitations of SF-36 (generic measure of HRQOL)

A

May be affected by some more than others, individual differences, limitations may not be comfortable to disclose

21
Q

Advantages of generic measures e.g (SF-36)

A

Can compare scores across different diseases and to other samples

22
Q

Disease specific measures are

A

Designed for particular group, sensitive to small, clinically important changes, more familiar items

23
Q

Example of disease specific measure of HRQOL

A

MS Impact scale-29 (MSIS-29)

24
Q

Evaluation of disease specific measures

A

People with MS theoretically more pertinent than generic measures and can see where resources can be targeted Riazi et al (2003)

25
Q

Individualised measures of HRQOL example

A

Schedule for the evaluation of individual QOL

26
Q

What is the schedule for the evaluation of individual QOL?

A

Semi structured interview to elicit 5 areas of life most important to their QOL (0-100 scale)

27
Q

schedule for the evaluation of individual QOL evaluation

A

Takes into a con specific, relevant info but would only benefit small population

28
Q

Potential applications for HRQOL measures

A

Drug testing, advances in psychometrics

29
Q

Patient-centredness (Bryne and Long, 1976)

A

Preferred style of Doctor patient communication as a means to improve patient outcomes

30
Q

What does a doctor expect from a patient?

A

Explain symptoms clearly, explain behaviour, listen, take control of symptoms

31
Q

Savage-Armstrong (1990) criticism of patient centredness?

A

359 random patients, direct approach= more satisfied than sharing