Past papers 2014 Flashcards
Solvency margin
The excess of the value of an insurer’s ASSETS
over its
- TECHNICAL RESERVES
- CURRENT LIABILITIES
What is meant by an insurer having an “improved solvency position”?
An insurer’s solvency position is improved if its solvency margin increases relative to its solvency requirement.
Outline the ways in which reinsurance can be used to improve an insurer’s solvency position
INCREASING THE VALUE OF THE ASSETS:
- reinsurance commission
- Financial reinsurance can be sought.
— Such arrangements can effectively be loans repaid from the future profits of the underlying business.
— As the “repayments” of the “loan” are contingent on profits they DO NOT APPEAR AS A LIABILITY on the balance sheet, which would have been the case
with a bank loan.
DECREASING THE VALUE OF THE LIABILITIES
- By reinsuring the insurer is reducing the value of its liabilities as some of its
liabilities are ceded to the reinsurer.
- Reinsurance allows the insurer to get a better spread of risks which may result in more certainty in aggregate results and therefore less need for margins in reserves.
- Reciprocal arrangements can also assist with this.
- Non-proportional cover can assist in dealing with:
— large claims; and
— accumulations of risk.
All of the above allow the insurer to hold lower reserves.
However, the assets are reduced by the amount of the reinsurance premium paid.
DECREASING THE REGULATORY MINIMUM SOLVENCY REQUIREMENT:
- The required solvency level is often calculated with reference to the proportion of business reinsured, i.e. more reinsurance means a lower solvency requirement, and therefore a stronger solvency position.
- However, this reduction may be subject to a limit, since there may be a legal requirement for an insurance company’s free reserves to exceed a Required Minimum Margin (e.g. to protect against reinsurer failure).
2 Types of “run-off reinsurance”
Adverse development cover
Loss portfolio transfers
Adverse development cover
A reinsurance arrangement whereby a reinsurer agrees,
in return for a premium,
to cover the ultimate settled amount of a specified block of business above a certain pre-agreed amount.
- It protects the cedant from significant reserve deterioration on run-off business.
- The premium that is payable for the cover will depend on the risk appetite of the market.
- Usually it is only possible to reinsure a layer above a specified amount, i.e. there is usually an upper limit to the cover.
- The reinsurer may also insist that the insurer has a small participation in the layer.
- Claims are usually still handled by the insurer and hence there are the associated expenses.
- Reserves are maintained by the insurer (as opposed to being transferred to the reinsurer) and it receives all INVESTMENT INCOME generated from the investments backing these reserves.
- The insurer is exposed to the CREDIT RISK of the reinsurer, since the insurer remains liable to the insured parties for all claims within the block reinsured.
Loss portfolio transfers
An arrangement whereby the liability for a specified book of business is passed in its entirety from one insurer to another.
- Policyholders will be informed of this “novation” (the transfer of rights and obligations under a contract from one party to another) and the deal may need to be approved by a court.
- Novation is not strictly reinsurance since the new insurer is responsible for the liabilities in total from the date of the transfer.
- The original insurer will transfer the reserves and the remaining exposure to the new insurer.
- It is likely that there will be a premium in addition to the existing reserves (to compensate the accepting insurer for taking on the risk and for the cost of the transfer).
- This would normally include a claims handling service.
- Assets may need to be realised to pass across the value of the reserves to the accepting insurer (which is particularly important if there is mismatching or if tax gains / losses would be crystallised).
- If the new insurer defaults, this could damage the reputation of the original insurer.
- The transfer may require the buy-in of reinsurers where there are existing reinsurance arrangements covering the portfolio.
Explain how selling through independent brokers may increase liquidity risk for the company
Liquidity risk may increase because:
- Brokers often collect premiums on behalf of the insurance company.
- This money will accrue as income to the insurer, but is not available as cash until the broker has paid it through to the insurer.
- This may affect the insurer’s ability to meet its obligations.
- – This is particularly so if the money is paid later than expected.
Outline the relative ADVANTAGES of selling business directly to the public
- The company has greater control over the remuneration of sales staff. (Brokers to an extent dictate the remuneration rates particularly in markets where broker business is dominant.) This may allow COST SAVINGS or better alignment of incentives.
- Sales-staff are selling ONLY YOUR PRODUCTS. Brokers may have a number of products from other companies that compete with yours and will sell the most appealing (to them) first.
- The company retains CONTROL OF THE TARGET MARKET by selling direct. There is no guarantee that brokers are selling to the desired target market.
- It can give the company greater CONTROL OVER SALES VOLUMES, e.g. the ability to stop selling business to a certain category of policyholders by simply instructing call centre agents, rather than having to communicate to all brokers.
- The company may increase its potential reach and hence sales volumes. This is particularly important as direct selling is an expanding market and if the company does not start selling direct, competitors may gain a first-mover advantage.
- It can be an EFFICIENT way of selling business (e.g. can run one training session for all sales staff rather than visiting brokers separately), and result in some long-term
cost savings. - MANAGEMENT INFORMATION should be able to be accessed more quickly as it will be directly loaded onto the company’s systems – no need to collect data from
brokers. - Premium rates do not need to be as competitive as is required when selling via independent intermediaries as potential policyholders cannot compare quotes as simply as when buying through brokers. This could allow GREATER PROFIT to be
made. - There will be a REDUCED LIQUIDITY RISK in that brokers are not holding premiums for the company.
- Selling directly allows active CROSS-SELLING of products as the company has direct contact with customers.
Outline the relative DISADVANTAGES of selling business directly to the public
- The company will incur the COSTS of setting up and maintaining an internal sales force.
- Furthermore, this will be a fixed cost (including salaries) compared to broker commission which is only paid when brokers bring in business. This increases fixed costs and the associated risk of not selling enough policies to cover costs.
- Brokers have an existing client base to which they can sell. They therefore can provide the company with more exposure to the market than they may be able to do directly – at least initially.
- Some product features may be COMPLEX, and such products could be difficult to sell directly to the public compared to brokers where they are able to explain product features to potential policyholders.
- It will take time to build up expertise in selling directly. This may make direct selling less effective initially.
- Extra costs will be incurred in establishing brand awareness with the public (through marketing etc.) because in the past policyholders would have known brokers brands, but not the insurer’s brand.
- The policyholders attracted (target market) will likely be different, resulting in pricing assumptions being invalid (if there were cross-subsidies in existing rates based on a certain mix of business).
- Renewal rates may decline (lapses increase) on existing policies if broker business is done away with as policyholders are likely to have some degree of loyalty to their broker, rather than to the insurer. This will reduce policy volumes and reduce the insurer’s ability to recover expenses.
- Renewal rates may decline and lapses increase, impacting on expense recoupment.
- The mix and volume of business attracted will not be known, which could make pricing difficult initially.
Explain the problem that is posed by EXPENSE CROSS-SUBSIDIES between different LINES OF BUSINESS
- Premiums for one class will be higher than they would be if they were only covering the costs of that book as they are also covering some expenses from the book of business.
- This increases the risk that the insurer’s policies are overpriced relative to competitors’ policies hence competitors attract business away from this insurer.
Steps in an expense investigation / allocation to minimise cross-subsidies
GOAL OF THE EXERCISE:
- The goal of this exercise is to determine which expenses are as a result of writing each of the products, so that the cost of writing each product can be determined.
- This cost will then be compared to the current expense loading for each product to see if there is indeed an expense cross-subsidy.
- The expense loading can be calculated by taking the gross premium and subtracting the expected claims cost and other loadings (e.g. capital loading and a negative loading for investment income).
COLLECT DATA:
- Data on all expenses must be collected.
- This is to ensure that the expense allocation to each product sums to the total expenses of the company.
- Data items to be collected include number of policies, premium volumes, etc.
ALLOCATE COMPANY EXPENSES BETWEEN PRODUCTS
The first step is to split expenses between direct and indirect expenses.
- – Direct expenses can be directly attributed to each product book
- – There may be certain expenses that can’t be directly allocated because they are shared between products
- It may be helpful to split expenses between fixed and variable expenses because variable expenses are always direct and can be allocated easily to the product they relate to
- Fixed expenses can be direct or indirect.
- Direct fixed expenses, will be easily allocated to the product they relate to.
- However there needs to be a pragmatic allocation of indirect fixed expenses that can’t easily be allocated to a particular product.
For example:
— Management salaries or admin staff salaries for staff that work on more than one product. Allocation may be in proportion to premium volumes or using staff timesheets.
— Property costs can be allocated by charging each department a notional rent according to floor space occupied and then allocating this rent to products in the same proportions as salaries of staff in each department.
— Computer costs. Spread cost over its useful lifetime and split according to how the salary of the staff member who uses the computer is split.
— Investment costs. Split based on the contribution of each product to the level of investible assets.
— Once-off capital costs. Allocate over useful lifetime and split according to their use. Similar to computer costs.
— Claims handling costs. If claims assessment is a fixed cost per claim, then the total claims assessment cost can be split between products based on the number of claims experienced on each product or, if only claims above a certain limit are assessed then claims assessment cost will be split based on number of claims above that level. If the claims assessment cost is proportional to the size of the claim, then the total claims assessment cost may be split between products based on total claims.
Commission expenses are likely to be excluded from this analysis (since it is
usually a straight forward percentage of premium per policy).
burning cost premium
The burning cost premium is defined as the actual cost of claims during a past period of years expressed as an annual rate per unit of exposure such that:
BCP = (Total Claims) / (Total Exposed to Risk).
effective burning cost premium
the burning cost premium using
unadjusted data.
indexed BCP (IBCP)
adjusts the claims for past inflation and also includes IBNR
Advantages of the burning cost approach
- Simplicity.
- Needs relatively little data.
- Quicker than other methods to perform.
- Allows for experience of individual risks or portfolios