Parties to a crime Flashcards
Principal offender
party that commits a substantive criminal offence. satisfied the actus reus and mens rea
joint principal offender
second party that has equally committed the offence
secondary offender
does not commit the substantive offence - assisted or encouraged the commission of the principal offence
joint entreprise
situations involving two or more individuals committing a criminal offence. principal and accessory intended different results
accomplices in SQE
interchangeable with secondary parties and accessories
innocent agents
party who commits the actus reus of the principal offence whilst following direction from another individual and cannot be liable for the offence
how can you be an innocent agent
lack capacity, lack mens rea etc. in these situations the acts of the innocent agent can be imputed on the principal offender
elements of accessorial liability
principal offender must commit a principal offence.
accessory must aid, abet, counsel or procedure the commission of the principal offence.
accessory must have knowledge of the essential matters of the offence.
accessory must intend to assist or encourage and for the principal offence to be committed.
If accessorial liability is achieved what is the next step
liable to be tried, indicted and punished as principal offender
Aid
assist, help or support him to commit the offence - providing weaponry, acting as a lookout etc
Abet
incite, instigate or encourage
counsel
advise or solicit the crime eg. hiring a hitman
procure
produce by endeavour
when is a defendant not liable
assistance provided after the crime is committed - eg covering up a crime
presence at the scene of an offence
not necessarily an offence, was there something they said or did? could they have intervened or express dissent?
essential matters
knowledge of any existing facts necessary for it to be criminal
Not enough knowledge for AL
only knows that something illegal is taking place
more knowledge required for AL
knows exact offence that is taking place and the particulars of the offence
right amount of knowledge for Al
knows the ‘type’ of crime committed or the range of the crimes that may be committed
Type of crime
eg theft, unlawful killing etc
range of crimes
eg knows an offence but not necessarily which one
withdrawal as defence to AL
change of heart and effectively withdraws - up to jury to decide effectiveness of the withdrawal.
communicated through words or actions.
unequivocal disengagement from the criminal enterprise.
only works as an accessory not inchoate offence.
overwhelming supervening event
there can be an argument that there was a change in character of the liable party beyond an escalation of events.
transferred malice
defendant is not liable when he and the principal offender agreed on a particular victim and the principal offender commits the offence on a different victim
Relevance of weapons
defendant knowing the principal is carrying a weapons only shows evidence of intention it is not the same as intention.
Inchoate offences
offences that are not yet complete, but steps have been taken to their commission
attempt
an offence in which defendant intends to commit but does not satisfy actus reus
when will it be considered an attempt
more than preparatory