Parties, Elections, and Public opinion Flashcards

1
Q

What roles do hegemonic parties play in post-Soviet authoritarian regimes (Bader, 2011)?

A

Hegemonic parties are dominant political forces in authoritarian regimes that help consolidate power and suppress opposition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How do hegemonic parties maintain loyalty among elites? (Bader, 2011)

A

They use patronage systems to exchange spoils, such as jobs and economic benefits, for loyalty. This ties political advancement to party allegiance rather than public support or ideology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What’s the difference between Hegemonic/dominant parties and ruling parties? (Bader, 2011)

A

Hegemonic (Dominant) Party: A hegemonic party consistently wins elections with a large vote share, controlling a significant majority in parliament. It acts as an instrument of the regime, helping to consolidate power, co-opt elites, and suppress opposition. It dominates the political landscape, often creating the illusion of democracy while ensuring authoritarian control.

Ruling Party: While the ruling party holds power, it may not have the same overwhelming dominance in elections or parliament. It may simply represent the government or the president’s administration, but it doesn’t necessarily have the same entrenched political and institutional control as a hegemonic party. The ruling party may be more vulnerable to challenges or shifts in power.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why are hegemonic parties considered tools of “party-based authoritarianism”? (Bader, 2011)

A

They dominate elections by suppressing competition and conveying an image of electoral invincibility. This discourages opposition, consolidates regime control, and ensures election outcomes favor the ruling party.
They function as tools to:
1. Co-opt potential rivals
2. Marginalize opposition
3. Recruit new elites
4. Engage in mass mobilization.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What tactics are used in Russia to sustain authoritarian rule through elections? (Zavadskaya et al, 2017)

A

Tactics include voter intimidation, media manipulation, and ballot-stuffing. These methods ensure electoral victories for the ruling party while maintaining a façade of legitimacy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does electoral malpractice vary across different electoral contexts in Russia? (Zavadskaya et al, 2017)

A

The degree and type of manipulation are tailored to specific contexts, such as regional versus national elections, to balance credibility and control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What vulnerabilities do sustained electoral manipulations expose in authoritarian regimes? (Zavadskaya et al, 2017)

A

Reliance on manipulation indicates a lack of genuine public support and deepens authoritarian entrenchment, potentially undermining regime stability in the long term.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the five characteristics of political parties in former Soviet states?

A

Weakness: Political parties are generally weak and lack strong institutional foundations.

Electoral mobilization: Parties primarily function as tools to mobilize voters during elections.

Made for Elites: They organize power among political elites.

Limit competition: Party competition is often controlled or limited, preventing strong opposition.

Importance of Leaders: Political leaders, rather than parties, play a more important role in shaping political outcomes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does electoral democracy in post-Soviet states differ from liberal democracy?

A

While elections are recognized as the only legitimate means to power, they often fail to achieve liberal values such as rule of law, political accountability, and minority rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What political shifts occurred in Georgia following the 2003 Rose Revolution?

A

Georgia transitioned to a parliamentary republic in 2018, with the PM becoming head of government and the president taking on ceremonial roles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What challenges has Georgia faced in its EU integration efforts?

A

The European Commission suspended membership talks due to laws perceived as pro-Russian and anti-LGBTQ, as well as allegations of electoral fraud and opposition boycotts in recent elections.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What trends were observed in Moldova’s 2024 presidential election turnout?

A

Turnout was higher abroad, with pro-EU receiving 82% of the vote overseas. This reflects the diaspora’s preference for pro-European candidates.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is an electoral autocracy and an electoral democracy?

A
  1. Electoral Autocracy: A system where elections occur, but they are manipulated to ensure the ruling party or leader remains in power, limiting political freedoms and suppressing opposition.
  2. Electoral Democracy: A system where elections are held regularly and are generally considered legitimate, but liberal democratic values like rule of law, political accountability, and minority rights are not fully upheld.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the “electoral dictator’s dilemma”?

A

Authoritarian leaders often hold elections to appear legitimate, both to their own citizens and the international community.
Elections can also help dictators identify their supporters and opponents, and maintain the loyalty of elites by demonstrating their power.

The Dilemma: not too rigged, not to liberal

If the elections are too rigged:
People see them as fake, which can fuel discontent and resistance, undermining the dictator’s legitimacy.

If the elections are more open:
There’s a risk the dictator could actually lose power or that opposition movements could gain strength and momentum.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How has political culture evolved in post-Soviet states?

A

Political culture in these states reflects Soviet legacies of authoritarianism, censorship, and political indifference. However, globalization and generational change have introduced aspirations for democratic values among younger populations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What role did Soviet political socialization play in shaping post-Soviet political attitudes?

A

Soviet political socialization, through schools, youth groups, and media, taught people to follow authoritarian values like loyalty to the state and obedience. These lessons shaped how many people thought about politics after the Soviet Union ended. However, there was often a gap between what the government said people should believe and how they actually behaved. This allowed some people to quietly develop and hold different ideas and values.

17
Q

Guve examples of institutional political participation from non-institutional political participation?

A

Institutional participation includes voting and party membership

Non-institutional actions include protests, boycotts, and petitions.

18
Q

How do protests, boycotts, and petitions affect political change in post-Soviet states?

A

In post-Soviet states, protests, boycotts, and petitions are important tools for citizens to challenge the government. These forms of participation can draw attention to issues like corruption, human rights abuses, or electoral fraud. While they may not always lead to immediate change, they can increase pressure on the government and mobilize public opinion.

19
Q

What factors contribute to low political participation in post-Soviet states?

A
  1. Nostalgia for Soviet-era stability
  2. Distrust in political institutions
  3. Culture of submissiveness to authority reduce active participation.
20
Q

What is “Lame-Duck Syndrome” in post-Soviet politics?

A

Lame-Duck Syndrome occurs when an incumbent leader, typically a president or chief patron, is expected to leave power due to reasons like term limits or old age. They may also be too unpopular to form new political alliances. This causes uncertainty and weakens their control, leading to power struggles among their supporters and rivals.
In some cases, this power struggle can trigger public uprisings or political events like the color revolutions, where opposition groups mobilize to challenge the ruling regime.

21
Q

How does Lame-Duck Syndrome explain the color revolutions in post-Soviet countries?

A

Hale suggests that Lame-Duck Syndrome played a role in the color revolutions (such as in Ukraine, Georgia, and Kyrgyzstan) by creating a political environment where incumbents were weakened. With the leaders unable to maintain their authority, factions within the government and opposition groups saw opportunities for power shifts, leading to mass protests and uprisings to remove the old regime.

22
Q

Why are presidential elections in post-Soviet states often seen as a “vote of confidence,” and what is their significance?

A

Presidential elections in post-Soviet states are seen as a “vote of confidence” because politics revolves around personal power. Political stability is tied to the stability of the president, making these elections a way to show support for the leader. As a result, presidential elections often have higher voter turnout, and presidents rarely lose, except in a few cases like Ukraine, Moldova, and Lithuania.