part one Flashcards
what is the need for orientation theory?
- people with less information will be more prone to believe whatever they hear.
- the less people know about a topic, the more they’re interested in finding out, the more influence the media have on their perception.
when preparing a standby statement, why should you prepare for the worst?
because it is easier to scale back than it is to escalate
how many bullet points should your standby statement include?
10-20
what 6 things should the standby statement include?
- what we actually know about the situation
- the scope of the problem (how big and what could happen)
- the experts and what they have to say
- what’s confirmed
- anticipation of public response
- key messages (what, how, and to whom will it be communicated)
what MUST your standby statement include? what shouldn’t you comment on?
FACTS; do not comment on conjecture. tell people everything and plan for the worst.
what is the differences between problem and crisis?
- magnitude 2. problems are predictable, manageable, and don’t have a lot of public attention; crises are erratic require considerable time and expense, are often in the public eye and bring unwanted attention
according to pauchant and mitliff, what do crises do?
crises “cause” a disruption that physically affects a system as a whole and threatens its basic assumptions
how do you deal with panicked people?
get them to listen, get them accurate and accessible information, get it to them multiple times & multiple ways, communicate to them in a way they’ll understand
what are the 3 different levels of preparation?
worst-case scenario, moderate issue, nontrivial event
what is considered a ‘credible source’ for people to get information from? (3)
government officials, eyewitnesses, credited spokespeople
when do you react to a rumor?
when it begins to affect the bottom line
how do rumors arise?
they arise from uncertainty, absence of context and concrete information, and those affected understand its significance
what is a rumor?
a specific proposition for belief passed along from person to person (usually by word of mouth) without secure standards of evidence being present
when does snowballing occur?
when the rumor’s importance grows with each telling
what are 2 factors that influence a rumor?
- its importance to the listener
* its ambiguity (the less people know, the more powerful the rumor)
what is the best way to diminish/stop a rumor?
with truth and openness
what happens if TeleOrg responds to rumors of merger within the first 45 minutes? what can they expect from the media?
the organization has the most influence on a story’s outcome. at least 6 hours of negative coverage
what happens if TeleOrg doesn’t respond to rumors of a merger for 3 days?
it can expect ~2 weeks or (21 days?) of negative coverage
what happens if TeleOrg doesn’t appropriately respond to rumors of a merger for 2 weeks?
news cycle includes weekly and bimonthly magazines, industry trade and sunday morning talk shows.
during a crisis, TeleOrg releases materials that showcases the organization’s charity work. which part of the image restoration theory does this represent?
bolster
* emphasize good traits/beneficial past acts to offset damage
during a salary-fixing suite filed against TeleOrg, the organization releases materials that downplays the wrongdoing of the company in the face of a larger, national scandal. which part of the image restoration theory does this represent?
minimization
* portray wrongdoing as minor and unimportant WITHOUT being patronizing
during a salary-fixing suite filed against TeleOrg, a sexual harassment claim comes to light. the organization releases materials that frames the salary-fixing suite in a more positive light. which part of the image restoration theory does this represent?
differentiation
* suggests that an offensive act should be distinguished from other, similar but more offensive acts
during a salary-fixing suite filed against TeleOrg, the organization frames the misdeed by purporting that it ensured that all labor produced by employees best served the needs of the customer and were not impacted by employee competition or greed. which part of the image restoration theory does this represent?
transcendence
* attempts to place a misdeed as part of a larger context where more important values would pervade the situation
during a sexual harassment claim filed against a TeleOrg exec, the organization releases materials that frames employee ashton madison as someone who had a history of filing similar complaints at other companies and a record of embezzlement claims with no real followup. which part of the image restoration theory does this represent?
attack one’s accuser
* attempt to reduce the accuser’s credibility, reducing the offensiveness/plausibility of accusation
during a sexual harassment claim filed against a TeleOrg exec, the organization pays ashton madison damages of $2.1 million.
compensation
* offers payments or restitution to victim
during a sexual harassment claim filed against a TeleOrg exec, the organization institutes a stricter sexual harassment policy in the workplace and fires the accused.
corrective action
* fixing damage from wrongful act and/or taking steps to assure the problem never occurs again
during a sexual harassment claim filed against a TeleOrg exec, the organization publishes a public and formal apology to ashton madison.
mortification
1. an apology, an expression of sorrow or regret for offensive act
what is an organization to the public?
its reputation
what is the end result of the priming?
to make certain aspects of an issue more prominent/influential and to guide people’s judgment of issues, people, and events
what is a cognitive miser?
someone who doesn’t pay attention to all the readily-available and easily-accessible information
what is your main priority to stakeholders during a crisis?
to create a strategy to help them
according to the situational crisis communication theory, what are the 3 responsibilities it suggests during crisis?
- initial crisis responsibility
- crisis history responsibility (has the company had past similar experiences?)
- relational reputational responsibility (how well a company is perceived by stakeholders)
according to the situational crisis communication theory, what will people do in the event of crisis?
they look to find causes, or make attribution for different events. responsibility is attributed and reaction, emotional
what is the key to determining the most effective strategic crisis response?
understanding the crisis situation and the amount of reputational threat it poses
TeleOrg is in some shit again. Rumors have been flying that one of the products produced by their subsidiary, PeachFuzz, Co., is responsible for leading to the deaths of 5 industrial workers. If TeleOrg chooses to say nothing, what is the likely outcome?
they are hoping that something else dominates the news. if the media is interested, TeleOrg and PeachFuzz are the top story for months and any clients have been taken over by competitors. likely to go before congress. this is the worst case scenario.
TeleOrg is in some shit again. Rumors have been flying that one of the products produced by their subsidiary, PeachFuzz, Co., is responsible for leading to the deaths of 5 industrial workers. If TeleOrg chooses to release a little bit of information, what is the likely outcome?
if nothing else is released, then the media is going to start digging, searching for an employee who will talk. if documents appear that TeleOrg should or could have known that what it was doing was wrong, then the organization is going to see a class-action suit for millions, maybe billions. this is the 2nd worst case scenario.
TeleOrg is in some shit again. Rumors have been flying that one of the products produced by their subsidiary, PeachFuzz, Co., is responsible for leading to the deaths of 5 industrial workers. If TeleOrg chooses to release all information, what is the likely outcome?
TeleOrg will take a PR and consumer confidence hit and will be in the news for days, maybe weeks. the company’s forthrightness may eventually draw praise and consumers could eventually regain trust in TeleOrg for its honesty. this is the best case scenario.
what is the risk you take with crisis communications?
there is no scenario where an organization will walk away unscathed; there is no ‘no effect’ scenario. usually, you’re choosing between the lesser of all evils.