Part III. Debunking the Code of Kalantiaw Flashcards
The Code of Kalantiaw is a set of Penal Code supposedly written in the year _____________.
1433
However, the Code turned out to be a hoax actually fabricated in the year _____________.
1913
The Code was debunked by an American scholar presenting his dissertation at the History Department of the
University of Sto. Thomas in the year ______________.
1968
But the Code was not officially declared a hoax by the National Historical Commission of the Philippines until the
year _______________.
2004
What is the name of the American scholar who disproved the Code of Kalantiaw?
William Henry Scott
Former President Ferdinand Marcos, Sr., falling victim to the hoax, created the Order of Kalantiaw, an award that
was given to ____________________.
Legal luminaries and judges
To this day, some Filipinos still believe that the Code of Kalantiaw was real. It took a long time for it to be officially
declared a hoax. This can be attributed primarily to:
Nationalistic bias
He is the person behind the hoax; he fabricated the manuscript and all references, upon investigation, led to him.
Jose E. Marco
A custom, event, or object appearing in a time period to which it does not belong.
Anachronism
It was pointed out that the Code had some provisions that did not make sense. For example, Articles III and V of
the Code talked about:
being punished for a specific number of hours for certain offenses
Another clue that the manuscript could not have been written in the year it was purported to have been written was found in the dedication:
It was dedicated to the King of Spain, but at the time Queen Isabella II was the ruling monarch.
Another clue that the manuscript detailing the Code of Kalantiaw was a hoax was the use of the word microbe.
What year was the word microbe coined?
1878
The Antiguas Leyendes was supposedly written by one Jose Maria Pavon in what year?
1838
The Pavon manuscript mentioned Occidental Negros. However, there was no such province yet at the time because Negros was not divided until the year ______________.
1890
The Pavon manuscript referred to one document supposedly written in 1489 that mentioned King _______ of
Spain. This was clearly a fabrication because this King was not born until the year 1500.
King Charles V