Part B--Interpretation, Parol Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

UCC Implied Warranties

A

1) Warranty of Title + Against Infringement = warrant good title, rightful transfer, + no liens
2) Warranty of Merchantability= goods fit for ordinary purpose
3) Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose = fit for purpose buyer intends to use

Not every contract has–esp. important re: merchants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Warranty of Title and Against Infringement

A

Implied warranty that good title, rightful transfer, + no liens/sec. interests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Warranty of Merchantability

A

UCC–IF seller is merchant with respect to goods of that type THEN Implied warranty that goods fit for ordinary purpose for which used (ex. if sell knives–warrant knives won’t break)

ONLY if merchant of that type of goods–N/A if not merchant, one-off, not usual type

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Disclaimer of Warranty of Title + Against Infringement

A

1) specific lang OR if
2) buyer has reason to know otherwise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Disclaimer of Warranty of Merchantability

A

Oral or written language mentioning “merchantability”

In writing = must be conspicuous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Warrant of Fitness for a Particular Purpose

A

IF seller has good reason to know
1) Purpose for which goods req. AND
2) Buyer relying on seller’s skill/judgement re: goods
THEN
Implied warranty that goods sold fit for purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Disclaimer of Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose

A

In writing with conspicuous language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Exclusion of all warranties

A

Can do via
1) Express statement (ex “no warranties apply”) OR
2) Language plainly puts buyer on alert that no implied warranty OR
3) Course of dealing, course of performance, trade usage OR
4) Buyer fully examined goods before entering contract OR refused AND defects would have been apparent if inspected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Express UCC Warranties

A

Affirmation of fact or promise + part of basis for bargain = express warranty that goods will conform to affirmation/promise

Description of goods + part of basis = e. warranty that goods will conform to description

Sample or model + part of basis = e. warranty that goods will conform to sample/model

EVEN IF don’t explicitly say “warrant”, etc. –still have

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Damages for breach of warranty

A

Difference between value of goods at time accepted vs. value would have been worth if as warranted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Place of Delivery Gap Filler (UCC)

A

Seller’s Place of Business

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Price Gap Filler (UCC)

A

R. price at time of delivery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Time Gap Filler (UCC)

A

Reasonable time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Price Gap Filler (CL)

A

Typically quantum meruitr. value of services rendered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Contra Proferentem

A

Ambiguous terms are interpreted against the party who supplied the term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Doctrine of Reasonable Expectations

A

Even if term not ambiguous–will be interpreted vs. drafting party if conflict w/ r. expectations of other party

17
Q

Order for Interpretation of Ambiguous Terms

A

Course of Performance–> Course of Dealing –> Trade Usage

18
Q

Parol Evidence Rule Exceptions

A

1) Subsequent Agreements
2) Collateral Agreements
3) Evidence that Written Agreement Invalid/Unenforceable
4) Failure of Condition Precedent
5) Reformation

19
Q

Course of Performance v. Course of Dealing

A

Course of performance = actions w/in same contract (ex. prior shipments knowingly accepted)

Course of dealing = actions in prior contracts/interactions– (ex. made this sort of contract before, + did x)

20
Q

Reformation

A

MUST show c + c evidence that
1) Prior valid agreement AND
2) Incorrectly reflected in writing (ex. by mistake)

Idea–writing doesn’t reflect actual contract (ex. clerical error)
Remedy–contract rewritten w/ correct terms
Exception to parol evid. rule

21
Q

Fully/Partially Integrated

A

Parties meant for terms in contract to be final–but can have other provisions not mentioned

CAN introduce evidence that supplements agreement, so long as doesn’t contradict

22
Q

Completely Integrated

A

Parties meant for contract to be complete + exclusive statement of all terms

CANNOT introduce evidence that supplements agreement

CAN introduce evidence re ambiguous terms, course of performance/dealing, trade custom

23
Q

Partially v. Completely Integrated

A

Partially = can introduce extrinsic evidence re: terms, as long as don’t contradict

Completely = cannot look outside 4 corners, introduce extrinsic evidence re: supplemental terms

24
Q

Complete Integration Factors

A

Look at totality of the circum

Most important– merger clause? saying that this is “complete + entire agreement or equiv.

Some cts–merger clause conclusive–have = completely integrated

Other courts–persuasive–also look at level of detail, length, etc.

25
Q

Non-Carrier Cases

A

Parties not moving goods via common carrier (i.e. not shipping)

UCC = seller must tender delivery

26
Q

Carrier Cases

A

Parties intend for goods to be moved by common carrier–i.e. shipped

UCC =
Shipment contract (default)–only need to give goods to carrier, make appropriate arrangements, + notify buyer

Destination contract–have responsibility to ensure goods get to particular destination

27
Q

F.O.B.

A

Free On Board

FOB [place] –> place = delivery pt

FOB [seller] = shipment contract
FOB [buyer] = destination contract

28
Q

F.A.S.

A

Free Alongside

Seller must deliver goods alongside vessel in manner usual at port of delivery OR buyer-designated dock, AND must give receipt

29
Q

Risk of Loss (Carrier Cases)

A

Default = buyer liable once goods given to carrier (shipment contract)

Exception: contract req. seller to deliver goods to x location (destination contract)

30
Q

Risk of Loss (Non-Carrier Cases)

A

Seller merchant–passes to buyer when buyer takes possession of goods

Seller non-merchant = passes to buyer on tender of delivery