Part A--Formation, Battle of Forms, SoF, etc. Flashcards

1
Q

Statute of Fraud Categories

A

MYLEGS500
-Consideration of Marriage
-Will not be completed w/in 1 year (from date of formation)(exception–employment contracts)
-Contract for sale of interest in land (exception–present conveyance, short term leases, contracts to lease, partial performance)
-Contract of executor/administrator to answer for duty of decedent
-Contract of guarantee or suretyship (i.e. promise to answer for debt to 3d party)(exception–main purpose exception, and creditor discharges original debtor on faith of guarantee )
-Sale of goods $500 or more (UCC)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Main purpose exception

A

Exception to SoF writing req. for guarantors/promise to answer for debt of third party

-If main purpose protect/promote own econ. interests–can be oral

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Contract for future sale vs. present conveyance of land

A

Key difference–present conveyance not covered by SoF
-SoF takes “contract for sale” literally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Exception to L SoF

A

Sale of interest in land exception–short term leases for year or less, contracts to lease
-If year or more–need writing (see year req.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Exception to G SoF

A

Guarantee/suretyship (agreement to answer for debt of third party) exceptions

1) Creditor discharges original debtor from oblig. to pay based on guarantee of third party
2) Main purpose exception–if main purpose (“leading object”) to protect promote guarantor’s own econ. interests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Exception to L SoF

A

Sale of interest in land exceptions
1) Present conveyance (v. contract to sell)
2) Short-term lease/contract to lease (w/in one year)
3) Partial performance–Partial payment AND entrance into land OR made improvements–idea is reliance that cannot be remedied by $$
4) Promissory estoppel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Statute of Frauds general rule

A

If the Statute of Frauds applies, then an oral contract is unenforceable except when the agreement is written/memorialized in a writing signed by party against whom enforcement is sought

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Common law SoF Writing requirement

A

1) Writing
2) Signed by party against whom enforcement is sought
3) containing: a) ID of parties; b) nature and subject matter; and c) essential terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Tacking together signed + unsigned (not incorp. by reference) docs under SoF

A

Need:
1) One signed writing unambig. establishes contract relationship
2) Signed + unsigned docs clearly refer to same subject AND
3) Clear and convincing evidence of acquiescence to unsigned docs by party being sued

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Signature under SoF

A

Anything intended to authenticate the doc. (ex. initials, typed sig., letterhead, most states–elect. sig.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Part performance enforcement for land only applies if

A

Action by buyer v. seller
Action for specific performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Restitution

A

Recover value of benefits conferred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Quantum meruit

A

Recover reasonable value of services rendered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Part performance + 1 year contract

A

Not valid–but full performance = enforceable, might get quantum meruit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Promissory estoppel + SoF

A

Some jx impose stiffer reqs vs. ordinary promissory estoppel–still need same reqs. but look at
CL
1)nature of reliance + relationship to remedy
2) corroboration of reliance by terms of contract
3) evid. of contract existence/terms

UCC–sometimes need to show unconscionable injury, unjust enrichment

Exception to stiffer reqs–general (i.e. construction) contractors almost always allow p. estoppel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Common law v. UCC Statute of Frauds

A

Common law–marriage, year or more, sale of interest in land, executor’s personal promise re: decedent, guarantor promise to debt of 3d party

UCC–goods of $500 or more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Writing req. under UCC Statute of Frauds

A

1) Writing
2) Signed by party against whom enforcement sought
3) “sufficient to indicate a contract for sale has been made”
4) Quantity of goods (+ only enforceable to that extent, even if wrong)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Quantity under UCC SoF

A

Required for enforceability (up to amount listed)
-Can use other language in contract IF provide “unambig.” basis for quality
-Output/requirements contracts + expression of “output” “requirements” or equiv. = OK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Ways to satisfy UCC SoF

A

1)Signed writing
2)Merchant’s confirmation
3) In court admission
4) Part performance (if divisible only up to amount/payment received and accepted)
5) Substantial reliance by seller of specially manufactured items

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Merchant Confirmation

A

Confirmation of oral agreement IF
1) Both merchants
2) “Sufficient v. sender”
3) “confirmation of contract”
4) w/in “reasonable time
5) receiving merchant has “reason to know” of contents (ex. not lost in mail)
UNLESS
1) written notice of objection w/in 10 days (Notice can also be a merchant confirmation + binding if meets above–ex. “please send the remaining 200”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Part Performance under UCC SoF

A

1) actions of both parties indicating contract exists AND
2) payment or goods received and accepted (indivisible = partial payment enough for whole contract, divisible = only amt paid/accepted)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Substantial Reliance SoF UCC Exception

A

Seller can enforce oral SoF contract if

1) Goods specially manufactured for buyer
2) Not suitable for sale in ordinary course of business
3) Seller sub. begun making goods or made commitments to get
4) Circumstances r. indicate the actions/ goods for buyer AND
5) Actions occurred before received notice of revocation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Revocation of Unilateral Contract

A

Irrevocable once performance has begun (majority rule)
Preparation does not count–offeror can revoke
(Min disfavored rule–only irrevocable once performance complete)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Types of Contract Law

A

1) UCC–re: sale of goods
2) Common law–re: services

25
Q

UCC definition of goods

A

Any “movable item”

26
Q

Hybrid Contract types (for goods and services)

A

Majority: predominant purpose
Look at:
1) Language of contract
2) Nature of supplier’s business
3) Rel value of goods v services

Minority: partition contract–goods use UCC, service uses CL

Goods incidental = CL
Services incidental = UCC

27
Q

Offer Elements

A

1) Outward manifestation AND
2) Signal that acceptance will seal deal

Key–is offeror willing to commit w/out further assent if accepted?

28
Q

Termination of Power of Acceptance

A

1) Lapse of Time
2) Death/Incapacity of Either Party
3) Revocation by Offeror
4) Rejection by Offeree

29
Q

Termination through lapse of time

A

Can be time stated in offer
If not specified–r. time

30
Q

Face to Face Conversation Rule

A

Offer made face-to-face = ordinarily deemed to be only open till close of conversation, unless evidence otherwise

31
Q

Revocation By Offeror

A

General rule–free to revoke at any time, if
1) Prior to acceptance AND
2) Effectively communicated

Can be direct OR indirect (learned from 3d party)

Exception: enforceable/non-revocable options contract/offer

32
Q

Direct Revocation

A

Offeror communicates revocation directly w/ offeree

33
Q

Indirect Revocation

A

Offeree learns of offeror’s intention to abandon from third party source
Effective IF
1) Definitive action inconsistent w/ keeping offer open AND
2) Offeree acquires reliable info re: action from 3d party source

34
Q

Revocation by Advertisement/General Notice

A

2d RST-OK if
1) Communicated by ad or general notice that is functional equiv. AND
2) No better means r. available

35
Q

Mirror Image Rule (CL)

A

CL rule–unless Acceptance mirrors terms = rejection + counteroffer

36
Q

Mirror Image (UCC)

A

Does not exist under UCC
If acceptance does not match offer/adds terms

Non-material = part of contract, unless explicitly stated
Material or conflicting = knock out

37
Q

Enforceable Options Contract (CL Majority)

A

MUST HAVE
1) Offer AND
2) Subsidiary promise to keep offer open AND
3) Valid mech for sec. enforcement (almost always consideration)

Promissory estoppel–foreseeable + r. reliance, + injustice if not enforced

38
Q

Enforceable Options Contract (CL Minority)

A

Can prevent revocation of offer IF OFFER
1) In writing + signed by offeror AND
2) Recites consideration for promise to keep open AND
3) Proposes exchange on fair terms w/in r. time

Promissory estoppel–foreseeable + r. reliance, + injustice if not enforced

39
Q

Firm Offer Rule (UCC)

A

Can make irrevocable offer without consideration IF
1) Made by merchant AND
2) In writing signed by merchant AND
3) Offer expressly states will be held open AND

UCC only–NOT CL

CANNOT be longer than 3 months UNLESS also meets reqs of CL options contract

40
Q

Offers + Construction Contracts

A

Generally–if gen. contractor uses subcontractor bid to formulate own bid = implied option contract via promissory estoppel

Idea—reliance, can’t revoke even though no consideration

41
Q

Merchant (UCC)

A

Party with special knowledge or skill re: practices OR goods of transaction

Still merchant if only have knowledge re: goods, or vice versa

42
Q

Bilateral Contract

A

Offer looking for promise to do x

Promise to perform = acceptance

43
Q

Unilateral Contract

A

Offer looking for performance

Can only accept via performance
Even if abandon partway–gen. not liable, b/cause not accepted

Pretty rare: gen reward offers + real estate brokerage agreements

44
Q

Acceptance (CL)

A

1) Mirror Image Rule–must mirror terms of offer
2) Communicated to offeror

No method specified = any r. means IF
1) Means used by offeror OR
2) Means customarily used in sim transactions OR
3) Means equivalent in expeditiousness + reliability to means used by offeror

45
Q

Acceptance by Silence

A

Default no–but 3 exceptions
1) Takes benefit of services w/ r. opp to reject and reason to know offeror’s intent OR
2) Offeror gives reason to believe silence = acceptance AND offeree intends to accept via silence OR
3) Because of previous dealings, etc it is r. that offeree will only notify if not accepting (binding EVEN IF no intent to accept)

46
Q

Crossed Offers/Offers Passing in the Night

A

Need meeting of minds to form contract–so if two offers fly/are mailed past each other–even if same terms, no contract

47
Q

Acceptance of Offer (UCC)

A

1) Promise to ship goods in conformity (ex. acknowledgement of order form)
2) Prompt or current shipment of goods in conformity
3) Shipment of nonconforming goods (but also breach)

48
Q

Exception to Mailbox Rule

A

If mail rejection first and THEN mail **acceptance **= whichever reaches offeror first determines result

49
Q

Battle of the Forms (CL)

A

Perfect tender rule–if acceptance’s terms do not match offer’s terms (ex. new or contradicting clauses–> no contract

50
Q

Battle of the Forms (UCC Consumer)

A

If acceptance contains additional or different terms –> terms are proposals for addition

NOT part of contract UNLESS **offeror expressly agrees

51
Q

Battle of the Forms (UCC Merchants)

A

Additional terms = incorp into contract UNLESS
1) offer expressly limits acceptance to terms OR
2) Offeror object w/in r. time OR
3) Materially alter contract

Different/contradicting = knockout rule—invalid

52
Q

Sec. 2-207–Material Alterations

A

Q– would it result in surprise/hardship if incorporated w/out express awareness of other party
Ex.
-Negate standard warranties
-Materially shorter period for complaints
-Vary trade usage/course of dealing in sig. way

53
Q

Written Confirmation with Different Terms

A

V. similar to Battle of Forms
Consumer = proposal for addition–N/A unless accepted

Merchants = additional terms added UNLESS a) materially alter OR b) objection w/in r. time
Conflicting terms–knockout

54
Q

Conditional Acceptance

A

Acceptance that is conditioned on agreement to added/different terms
Majority–if language re: material change clear and conspicuous–> conditional acceptance
Minority–must explicitly say won’t do business unless accept terms

55
Q

Contracts Formed By Conduct (UCC)

A

If act like have contract but no writing = can still estab. contract (but see SoF)

56
Q

Approaches to Consideration

A

Majority = bargained-for exchange

Minority = benefit/detriment test
Minority test–is promisee giving up something had legal rt to do/not to do?

57
Q

Gratuitous Transfer

A

Legally binding gift if
1) Deliver gift AND
2) Intent to bestow gift

58
Q

Moral Consideration

A

AKA past consideration (ex. “you saved my life–I’ll give you 1K!”) Majority–not valid consideration
Minority–valid if
1) Past benefit was conferred on promisor (vs. 3d party) AND
2) Benefit material

59
Q

Promissory Estoppel

A

1) Promise AND
2) Foreseeable Reliance AND
4) Actually Relied AND
5) Injustice w/out Enforcement