Part A1 ACTEX Qs Flashcards
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
According to Baer and Rendall, in Dillon v. Guardian Insurance, Guardian Insurance was found responsible for damages in excess of policy limits. Discuss the reason for the judge’s decision.
The judge concluded that there was overwhelming probability that Dillon would be found 100% at fault. An insurer should seek to settle if they can within the policy limits, or they must take the risk upon themselves (absolute liability)
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
According to Baer and Rendall, in Broadhurst & Ball v. American Home Assurance Co., how did the judge rule in respect to how defence costs are shared when there is more than one insurer?
Shared Equally (although it is normal for the primary insure to cover the costs until the policy limit has been exhausted, and then excess insurer take over)
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
Baer and Rendall: Identify Professor Fleming’s approaches to loss sharing between collateral sources and tort recovery
- Election
- Cumulation
- Reimbursement
- Relieving the Tortfeasor
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
Describe Professor Fleming’s 4 possible ways to handle multiple recovery situations.
- Election: person decides whether to try and get money from wrongdoer or accept from the collateral source
- Cumulation: permitting the insured to collect from both sources
- Reimbursement: wrongdoer pays full amount, credit excess to collateral source
- Relieving the Tortfeasor: wrongdoer only has to pay what insurance doesn’t.
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
Is insurance first or seconder payer in a Reimbursement scenario of multiple recovery?
Second
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
Is insurance first or seconder payer in a Relieving the Tortfeasor scenario of multiple recovery?
First
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
According to Baer and Rendall, in Fletcher v. MPI, they owed a duty of care to its customers if certain criteria were met. Identify 3 criteria.
- Such customers rely on the info.
- Their reliance is reasonable
- MPI knew or ought to have known that they would rely on the information
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
In Baer and Rendall, Fletcher v. MPI, it was found that MPI’s duty is more or less onerous than that of the private agent or broker? Provide two reasons.
Less.
- The institutional setting in which public insurance is sold affords considerably less scope for privacy and individual attention.
- The employees of MPI do not hold themselves out as specialists in risk assessment and insurance advice.
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
In Baer and Rendall, Broadhurst & Ball v. American Home Assurance Co., what was American Home’s position with regards to the allocation of defence costs?
That they should be shared between it (the primary insurer) and the excess insurer in proportion of their policy limits.
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
In the case of Fletcher v. MPI, what was the issue raised with regards to government insurers?
The responsibility to inform customers about the type of coverage available.
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
In Dillon v. Guardian Insurance Co., how was the standard of absolute liability for claim settlement defined?
“that if an insurer can settle a claim against an insured within its limits and does not do so, it is liable to reimburse its insured for whatever claim goes against him”
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
In Dillon v. Guardian Insurance Co., identify and briefly describe three reasons why the standard of absolute liability was the appropriate standard.
- It avoids the burdens of a determination whether a settlement offer within the policy limits was reasonable.
- It eliminates the danger that an insured, faced with a settlement offer at or near the policy limits, will reject it and gamble with the insureds money to further its own interests.
- It is fair that in a situation where the insurers and insureds interests necessarily conflict, the insurer, which may reap the benefits of its determination not to settle should also suffer the detriments of it’s decision.
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
Baer & Rendall; Broadhurst & Ball v. American Home
Discuss the court’s reasoning for making it’s decision. (to equally apportion defines costs between the primary and excess insurer)
Since the potential judgment against the insured exceeded the limit of the primary policy, the excess insurer was clearly at risk. The excess insurer has a clear contractual duty to defend the respondents under the terms of it’s policy and absolving it of the duty because the pirmary insurer is providing defines would confer a windfall on the excess insurer.
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
Provide two facts supporting the decision ordered in Fletcher v. MPI.
- The applicant for insurance testified that ‘he had relied upon the expertise of MPI’s employees’
- In the application for insurance and on the insurance certificate, there was no mention that he lacked ‘underinsured motorists coverage’
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
Describe the nature of the insurance arrangements in the case of Broadhurst & Ball v. American Home Assurance.
The respondents purchased professional liability insurance from two insurers: a standard policy from American Home with a limit of $500,000 per occurrence and an excess policy from Guardian with a limit of 9.5M per loss.
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
Of the 4 possible methods by which a tortiously injured party can recover from an outside source, identify which method violates the principle of indemnity, and why.
Cumulation; by allowing double recover as the injured party profits by receiving more than is necessary to compensate him for this loss.
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
In Canada, who has exclusive jurisdiction over contract wording?
Provincial Government
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
In Canada, who has exclusive jurisdiction over solvency?
Nobody had ‘exclusive’ jurisdiction. Both provincial and federal government have a role.
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
According to McDonald, Privy Council decisions have generally supported or opposed the position of the federal Parliament in constitutional insurance cases?
Opposed
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
In ‘Life Insurance Laws of Canada’, McDonald describes the 1974 constitutional dispute involving Canadian Indemnity Company and the Attorney General of BC. Discuss the nature of this dispute…
The legislature of BC passed a compulsory insurance scheme that eliminated private insurers. The insurance companies affected by the law sued, arguing that the legislation acted beyond it’s powers.
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
In ‘Life Insurance Laws of Canada’, McDonald describes the 1974 constitutional dispute involving Canadian Indemnity Company and the Attorney General of BC. Describe the two specific arguments raised in this dispute.
- The matter was properly within the exclusive federal jurisdiction relating to the regulation of trade and commerce.
- the legislation interfered with the status and capacity of a federally incorporated company.
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
In ‘Life Insurance Laws of Canada’, McDonald describes the 1974 constitutional dispute involving Canadian Indemnity Company and the Attorney General of BC, how did the court rule?
The Supreme Court found that the legislature had acted within its powers.
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
McDonald, in ‘Life Insurance Laws of Canada’ describes The Insurance Reference Case. Describe the facts of the case:
The federal Insurance Act of 1910 required that insurers operating in more than once province obtain a federal license.
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
McDonald, in ‘Life Insurance Laws of Canada’ describes The Insurance Reference Case. How did the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council rule on this case?
Ruled that Parliament did not have the authority to regulate such companies by a licensing system.
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
McDonald, in ‘Life Insurance Laws of Canada’ describes The Insurance Reference Case. What two actions did feral Parliament take as a direct consequence of the decision?
- It passes a new Insurance Act in 1917
- It amended the Criminal Code making it an indictable offence for person to solicit or accept an insurance risk except when acting on behalf of a company licensed under the federal Insurance Act.
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
According to McDonald, if a provincially incorporated company conducts business in a province other than where it was incorporated, who will supervise the company’s affairs? (Federal, Province of business, Province of incorporation)
Province where company was incorporated.
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
State the purpose of the Fire Insurance Policy Act.
McDonald: (Citizens Insurance Co. v. Parsons)
It required certain statutory considerations to be included in fire insurance policies insuring property in Ontario.
Baer and Rendall, McDonald, Noonan (no Q’s on ICA, KPMG PACICC, Myhall)
Citizens Insurance Co. v. Parsons involved a company questioning the constitutional validity of the Fire Insurance Policy Act. What were two arguments of the insurance company?
- The Act was ultra vires because the subject matter related to the regulation of trade and commerce which was exclusively within federal jurisdiction.
- A province cannot legislate so as to deprive a federally incorporated company or a British company of it status and capacity.