Part 4: Human Capital Flashcards
Executive compensation
Short-term incentives - fixed pay (salary) & variable pay (bonus, profit-sharing)
Long-term incentives - fixed pay (defined benefit plans) & variable pay (stock options, defined contribution plans)
Optimal contracting view
Aligning shareholder and managerial interest
Limitations to optimal contracting
Compensation contracts discussed with board of directors, as for managers, there is no certainty they will seek shareholder value maximisation (little equity interest)
Managerial power view
Limitations to optimal contracting indicate CEOs have substantial influence on compensation
Power-pay relationships
Executive compensation is higher when
- Boards are weaker
- No large outside shareholder is present
- Institutional ownership is less concentrated
- Takeover defences are stronger
Outrage
A package that leads to stakeholder outrage will be avoided by managers and directors
Camouflage
Hiding compensation to avoid the outrage of shareholders
Camouflage in practise
- Compensation consultants - outside consultants often used in designing and communicating compensation packages. Incentives to justify compensation rather than optimizing
- Stealth compensation - pay practises that make total compensation and pay-performance ratio more blurred (pension plans, deferred compensation, post-retirement perks, consulting contracts, executive loans)
- Non-contracted goodbye payments
Conclusions from lecture 12: agency, incentives, and managerial compensation
- With information asymmetry and misaligned incentives, agency costs occur
- Contracts are designed to align incentives
- Managerial power can undermine the optimal design of contracts
- Poor incentive structure can instead cause suboptimal managerial actions
Reasons for equity compensation
- Shareholder-management alignment
- Scarcity of cash
- Employee retention
- Accounting and tax treatment
- Rise of technology firms (?)
Characteristics of employee stock option contracts
At-the-money Ten-year maturity Vesting periods Illiquid Forced exercise in mergers or exits
Measurement issues when valuing employee stock options
- Vesting
- Illiquidity
- Which stock price? (we need the option value to estimate value per share, and the value per share to estimate option value)
- Taxation
- Non-trade firms
Backdating
The practise of retroactively choosing the grant date of a stock option so that the date of the grant coincides with a date when the stock price was lower
Narayanan et al. (2007)’s four consequences of backdating
- Legal - backdating is illegal and have economic consequences for the firm
- Tax - is treated differently between at-the-money options and in-the-money options
- Disclosure - if done legally, require costly disclosures
- Incentives - inefficient compensation
How can we detect backdating?
Grant date occurring in a dip