Part 3 Slides 42-91 Flashcards
What is the biggest problem in affinity chromatography
Give example
Non specific binding to the beads
Get over this by using magnetic beads instead of sepharose beads
Also Need to make sure that the protien binding part on the protien is free to dock the site on the bead
Atp, when purifying need to know what part of it docks to make a affinity chromatography bead for it
What are the steps in affinity chromatography
Incubate the crude sample (or serum if purifying antigens) with the bead to let the target protien bind
Wash away unbound samples
Elite the target protien from the ligand in the bead by chasing buffer conditions (might be hard because if very high affinity it won’t come off easily)
Is affinity chromatography a very powerful purification method
Yes, gives more than 1000 fold purification
What are group specific ligands
Give examples of group specific ligands and their specificities
Ligand in beads that have affinity for a group of related substances instead of just a single type of molecule
Protien A: the Fc (constant) region of IgG
IgG: the epitope of igG
Benzamadine : serine proteases
What are non group specific ligands and their specificities
Bind specific recombinant protiens
Amylose: MBP tagged proteins
Glutathione: GST tagged protiens
Metal ion (like ni2+): protiens with poly his tags
A peptide or protien domain: protiens that dock a specific protien sequence or domain
How many enzymes are in cells that have bid ing pockets for atp
4
What are immobilized/directly coupled ligands
What are indirectly coupled ligands
Direct: you have your gst tagged protien in crude extract and it is bound to the 3 aa long glutathione on the matrix
Elute with excess glutathione and you get the gst tagged protien with the glutathione attached to the gst
Indirect:
a pull down where the binding partners get coupled to the immobilized tag
Have the tagged protein binding to the column
But now pass over a solution with binding partners inside it and your proteins binding partners also get attached to the column
How can nonspecific binding on affinity chromatography be minimized
What’s the downside
How do you get protien off off the matrix
Adding low levels of detergent to wash buffer
Increasing salt concentration in wash buffer
But this could disrupt the actual interaction of the target with the bead , this is why you need to also do controls experiments with this
Elute:
Extreme Low or high pH (glycine ph 2 to elute igG)
high salt
detergents (SDS)
chaotropic agents (naSCN for pp1)
competion with a higher concentration counter ligand (like glutathione for gst elution) : same ligand that you coupled to the matrix
Explain the phneomena of binding partners in yeast
Protien protien interactions are the rule not the exception
6200 protiens in S.cerevisiae
Experiment where they tagged every protien in yeast then did a pull down to see binding partners of every protien
Found Asocial protien group called DLR1, whcih has no binding partners because did pull down and nothing came out
So out of 6200 protiens, only 461 protiens didn’t have partners
Shows how Protien protien interactions are the rule not the exception.
Even Once you find some other condition of the affinity chromatography, some those 461 could still show binding partners
How do you elute igG
Low ph (ex. Glycine ph 2)
What percent of protiens pulled down in affinity chromatography are non specifically bound
What type of protiens usually get nonspecifically bound
70-90%
Very abundant protiens like ribosome and histones
What is the crapome or the beadome
Non-specifically bound protiens that bind directly to the agarose beads
What else can help remove non specifically bound protiens and get over the issue of using detergent and salt to remove non specific binders
The TAP-tag
Explain the IP with phosphorylates RVSF antibody experiment results
EXACTLY SAME AMOUNT OF 2 MICROGRAMS Compared 5 control preimmune serum igG immunopreciptations and 5 p-RVSF igG IP (so the antibody recognizes phospho RVSF)
When purifying the control igG or the experimental igG, checked the number of resulting unique peptides that came from the protien they were purifying
The protien that elutes would have the p-RVSF motif meaning it got phosphorylated at the entrance of mitosis
RICTR protien showed no unique peptides in the control so not a non specific binder
But grp 78 had the same number of unique peptides in control as in experimental, meaning grp 78 is a non specific binder
NUMA1 also shows in the control experiment but it is higher in the experimental, meaning there is some degree of non specific binding but it is still a real binder
If the RICTR protien in the IP with phosphorylates RVSF experiment didn’t have the p-RVSY motif whats a reason is could have been captured by the igG
It would have a binding partner with the P-RVSF
and get eluted with that protien
For the bacterial non specific binding, why would the untagged BL21 DE3 protiens bind to the ni-NTA matrix even without the his tag
Non specific binding to the agarose bead, then eluting with high charge imidazole bumps them off the matrix
Might naturally have string of his residues
For the bacterial non specific binding, why would the tagged SLP1 lane show an extra band but the tagged slp 2 doesn’t
Not a non specific binder because it would be with the non specific binding band
It’s a protien that interacts with slp1 and copurfies but not with slp2
What can be added to a protien when it is being tagged
What is the term for these
Extra Amino acids
A functional domain of a protien
A whole protien
Fusion tag
What are the fusion tags
6x his
GST
MBP
What are epitope tags
Examples
6-10 aA peptides that need a specific antibody to bind to them on the column and purify
HA, Myc, Flag
HA is from the human influenza virus called hemaglutinin
Why don’t we use epitope tags for large scale purification
Because antibody based resins are expensive
Use for small scale purification
Explain how to use the MBP tag
And the way to elute
In our protien gene sequence, We add a protease cleavage site after the MBP part but before the target part of the gene
The target protien with the MBP bind to amylose sugar
First way to elute:
We elute with maltose, cleave with protease, then dialysis to remove the excess maltose and another chromatography step to remove MBP from target protien
Second way to elute:
Add protease first while the protein on amylose resin
Collect flowthrough with cleaved protien and protease, remove protease from solution
What’s another way to bind fusion protien to a column
There are antibodies made that specifically recognize these tags so we don’t have to make our own thing for them to bind to
Like an anti his antibody for his tagged protiens
What metals do the his on his tagged protiens bind to
Nickel cobalt and copper
What signifies that a column is charge with nickle
Blue colour
How is a column for IMAC prepared
The bead has either NTA or IDA (nitrilotriacetic acid, iminodiacetic acid) as a chela for for metal ion
Then NTA is charged with the metal (ni) to make Ni-NTA
Then the nitrogen on the his tag interacts with the metal
What are the conditions needed to do IMAC
The tags bind best to the column at ph 7.5 and 150 mM ionic strength (physiological)
Wash buffer has low amount of imidazole to prevent non specific binding of protiens that naturally have his, by washing them out
Also salt and low concentration detergent to stop nonspecific binding
Elute with high imidazole
How can IMAC also work for insoluble protiens
Since high salt and chaotropic agents like 8M urea and 6M guandiunium are compatible with the column
You can use them to first denature the protien to get is soluble then do IMAC
What are inclusion bodies
The protiens that are insoluble and aggreagate
we use denaturants to solubilize them to purify in IMAC
After being purified, they refold and precipitate after the urea is removed
What is the difference in GST MBP and IMAC
Gst and MBP needs the protien to be properly folded and have the 3D binding site to be functional so it can bind to the matrix
But IMAC doesn’t need this since his tags aren’t 3D, which is why we can purify inclusion bodies using denaturants