Part 3 - Representation, Practices & Procedures - Unit 1 - Questions Flashcards
In preparing a client’s current-year individual income tax return, a tax practitioner discovers an error in the prior year’s return. Under the rules of practice prescribed in Treasury Circular 230, the tax practitioner:
A. Is barred from preparing the current year’s return until the prior-year error is rectified.
B. Must advise the client of the error.
C. Is required to notify the IRS of the error.
D. Must file an amended return to correct the error.
B. Must advise the client of the error.
- Treasury Circular 230 requires tax practitioners to promptly inform a taxpayer of any error or omission or other noncompliance that the tax practitioner becomes aware of. The practitioner must also inform that taxpayer of the consequences of such error or omission or other noncompliance.
Janet is not an enrolled agent, CPA, attorney, or enrolled actuary. In 2023, the president of Widgets-R-Us engaged Janet to prepare the company’s 2022 Form 1120-S. She prepared the 2022 income tax return for Widgets-R-Us and signed it as the preparer. This is the only return Janet prepared for Widgets-R-Us. In December 2023, the IRS began an examination of Widgets-R-Us’ 2021 and 2022 federal income tax returns. Janet has a power of attorney to represent Widgets-R-Us for 2021 and 2022. Under Circular 230, Janet is permitted to represent Widgets-R-Us during the examination with regard to its:
A. 2021 Form 1120-S only.
B. 2022 Form 1120-S only.
C. 2021 and 2022 Forms 1120-S.
D. None of the answer choices are correct.
B. 2022 Form 1120-S only.
- Pursuant to Publication 947, pages 3 and 4, the following list of individuals qualifies to sign and therefore act as a representative of the taxpayer. The qualifying individuals include an attorney, certified public accountant, and enrolled agent, as well as the following:
- Officer—a bona fide officer of the taxpayer’s organization
- Full-Time Employee—a full-time employee of the taxpayer
- Family Member—a member of the taxpayer’s immediate family (i.e., spouse, parent, child, brother, or sister)
- Unenrolled Return Preparer—the authority to practice before the Internal Revenue Service is limited. The unenrolled return preparer must have prepared the return in question and the return must be under examination by the IRS.
- Since Janet is an unenrolled return preparer, she can represent Widgets-R-Us during the examination of the 2022 Form 1120-S only, which is the return that she prepared.
What is the penalty if fraud is the reason for failure to timely file?
A. A penalty of 10% per month (with a maximum of 50%) of the deficiency on the tax return (when filed).
B. A penalty of 15% per month (with a maximum of 75%) of the deficiency on the tax return (when filed).
C. A penalty of 20% per month (with a maximum of 50%) of the deficiency on the tax return (when filed).
D. A penalty of 25% per month (with a maximum of 75%) of the deficiency on the tax return (when filed).
B. A penalty of 15% per month (with a maximum of 75%) of the deficiency on the tax return (when filed).
- A penalty of 5% per month (up to a maximum of 25%) is imposed on the amount of tax shown as being due on the return if a taxpayer fails to file a tax return by the due date, including any extension. The minimum penalty amount is the smaller of $450 or 100% of the unpaid tax.
- If fraud is the reason for failure to file on a timely basis, then the penalty is 15% per month (with a maximum of 75%).
Which of the following statements is correct concerning the renewal of enrollment by an enrolled agent?
A. An enrolled agent whose Social Security number ends with the number 4 must apply for renewal between November 1, 2023, and January 31, 2024.
B. The renewal of enrollment is effective on April 1 for an individual who properly completes the renewal process.
C. Failure to receive notification from the Internal Revenue Service of the renewal requirement will justify an individual’s failure to satisfy this requirement.
D. All of the answer choices are correct.
B. The renewal of enrollment is effective on April 1 for an individual who properly completes the renewal process.
- Circular 230, Section 10.6(d), provides the rules associated with renewal of enrollment as an enrolled agent or enrolled retirement plan agent. In particular, an enrolled agent whose Social Security number ends with the number 0, 1, 2, or 3 must apply for renewal between November 1, 2024, and January 31, 2025, and thereafter every 3 years. Those with a Social Security number that ends with the number 4, 5, or 6 must apply for renewal between November 1, 2022, and January 31, 2023, and those with a number that ends with the number 7, 8, or 9 must apply for renewal between November 1, 2023, and January 31, 2024.
- In addition, the renewal of enrollment is effective on April 1 of the renewal year (i.e., 2025 for those with a Social Security number that ends with the number 0, 1, 2, or 3) for an individual who properly completes the renewal process. Finally, failure to receive notification from the Internal Revenue Service of the renewal requirement will not justify an individual’s failure to satisfy this requirement.
In preparing an Earned Income Credit Worksheet and Form 8867, to meet the due diligence requirements, a return preparer must retain for a certain period all of the following EXCEPT:
A. A record of from whom the information used to prepare the Form 8867 and the worksheets was obtained.
B. A copy of the Form 8867.
C. A record of any questions the taxpayer may have asked the tax preparer about their eligibility for the credits.
D. Copies of documents provided by the taxpayer that the return preparer relied on to determine the eligibility for the credits
C. A record of any questions the taxpayer may have asked the tax preparer about their eligibility for the credits.
- As provided on page 5 of the Instructions for Form 8867, a tax preparer is required to maintain the following records to meet the due diligence requirements:
- A copy of Form 8867;
- The applicable worksheet(s) or the tax preparer’s own worksheet(s) for any credit claimed by the taxpayer;
- Copies of any documents provided by the taxpayer on which the tax preparer relied to determine the taxpayer’s eligibility for, and the amount of the credit(s);
- A record of how, when, and from whom the information used to prepare Form 8867 and the worksheet(s) was obtained, and
- A record of any additional questions THE TAX PREPARER may have asked to determine eligibility for, and the amount of, the credit(s), and the taxpayer’s answers.
- The due diligence penalty applies to each of the four tax credits independently beginning in 2016. Starting in 2018, head of household is included on the due diligence checklist, which makes five items on the checklist. The penalty is annually adjusted for inflation.
- Therefore, a record of any additional questions the TAX PREPARER (not the taxpayer) may have asked to determine eligibility for, and the amount of, the credit(s), and the taxpayer’s answers is required to be retained.
What level of authority is needed for a tax return preparer to avoid an unreasonable position penalty on a tax return if the position was not disclosed and is not a tax shelter or reportable transaction?
A. There is or was substantial authority for the position.
B. There is reasonable basis for the position.
C. The position would more likely than not be sustained on its merits.
D. There is a 1-in-3, or greater, likelihood of being sustained on its merits.
A. There is or was substantial authority for the position.
- A tax return preparer is liable for a penalty under Section 6694(a) (i.e., penalty for understatement due to unreasonable position) unless they satisfy an exception provided for the defined three categories: general, disclosed position, and tax shelter or reportable transaction.
- The general category exception, which pertains when the position is not disclosed, is satisfied if there is or was substantial authority for the position.
- The disclosed position category exception is satisfied when the position is disclosed, item 3 below (on the tax shelter or reportable transaction category exception) does not apply, and there is reasonable basis for the position.
- The tax shelter or reportable transaction category exception is satisfied unless it is reasonable to believe that the position would more likely than not be sustained on its merits.
- In addition, no penalty shall be imposed if it is shown that there is reasonable cause for the understatement and the tax return preparer acted in good faith.
- Thus, in this situation, substantial authority for the position must apply to avoid an unreasonable position since the tax return preparer did not disclose the position.
Which of the below statements is correct regarding complaints for the sanctioning of a practitioner, employer, firm, appraiser, or other entity for violations of the regulations governing practice before the Internal Revenue Service?
A. A United States Tax Court judge oversees proceedings regarding the complaint.
B. In general, discovery may be permitted at the discretion of an Administrative Law Judge.
C. Within 30 days of receipt of the answer, the presiding judge will notify the parties of the right to request discovery and the timeframe for filing a request.
D. The complaint can only be served on the respondent in person by a designated employee of the Internal Revenue Service.
B. In general, discovery may be permitted at the discretion of an Administrative Law Judge.
- Circular 230 Section 10.71(a) states that “In general. Discovery may be permitted, at the discretion of the Administrative Law Judge, only upon written motion demonstrating the relevance, materiality and reasonableness of the requested discovery and subject to the requirements of §10.72(d)(2) and (3). Within 10 days of receipt of the answer, the Administrative Law Judge will notify the parties of the right to request discovery and the timeframe for filing a request. A request for discovery, and objections, must be filed in accordance with §10.68. In response to a request for discovery, the Administrative Law Judge may order:
- Depositions upon oral examination; or
- Answers to requests for admission.
- A United States Tax Court judge does not oversee the proceedings. A copy of the complaint does not have to be served in person.
- The correct answer is that in general, discovery may be permitted at the discretion of an Administrative Law Judge.
What action can be taken against an enrolled agent for a materially false or misleading statement that the client decides to make on a document submitted to the IRS?
A. No action can be taken against the agent as long as the client is the one that makes the final decision to submit the document containing the false or misleading statement.
B. The agent can be censured or suspended but not disbarred by the IRS as long as the client is the one that makes the final decision to submit the document containing the false or misleading statement.
C. The agent can be censured but not suspended by the IRS even if the client makes the final decision to submit the document containing the false or misleading statement.
D. The agent can be censured, suspended, or disbarred by the IRS even if it is the client that makes the final decision to submit the document containing the false or misleading statement.
D. The agent can be censured, suspended, or disbarred by the IRS even if it is the client that makes the final decision to submit the document containing the false or misleading statement.
- Circular 230, Section 10.50, provides the general rules for sanctions of a tax practitioner. In particular, the Secretary of the Treasury, or delegate, after notice and an opportunity for a proceeding, may censure, suspend, or disbar any practitioner from practice before the Internal Revenue Service if the practitioner is shown to be incompetent or disreputable (within the meaning of Circular 230, Section 10.51), fails to comply with any regulation in this part, or with intent to defraud, willfully and knowingly misleads or threatens a client or prospective client. Censure is a public reprimand.
- Circular 230, Section 10.51, provides that incompetence and disreputable conduct for which a practitioner may be sanctioned under Section 10.50 (i.e., censured, suspended, or disbarred from practice before the Internal Revenue Service) includes, but is not limited to:
- Conviction of any criminal offense under the revenue laws of the United States;
- Conviction of any criminal offense involving dishonesty or breach of trust;
- Conviction of any felony under federal or state law for which the conduct involved renders the practitioner unfit to practice before the Internal Revenue Service;
- Giving false or misleading information, or participating in any way in the giving of false or misleading information, to the Department of the Treasury or any officer or employee thereof, or to any tribunal authorized to pass upon federal tax matters, in connection with any matter pending or likely to be pending before them, knowing such information to be false or misleading.
- In this problem, the enrolled agent may be sanctioned because he or she has participated in the act.
NOTE: The above areas of conduct are but four of the 18 areas listed in Section 10.51.
What is the second-tier penalty if a tax preparer willfully or recklessly understated a taxpayer’s liability?
A. The greater of $2,000 or 60% of the liability.
B. The greater of $3,000 or 60% of the liability.
C. The greater of $5,000 or 65% of the liability.
D. The greater of $5,000 or 75% of the liability.
D. The greater of $5,000 or 75% of the liability.
- The penalty is the greater of $5,000 or 75% of the liability. (Note that there is also a first-tier penalty of the greater of $1,000 or 50% of income derived by the tax preparer for each tax return or claim for refund that understates the taxpayer’s liability due to unreasonable positions.)
A conflict of interest exists if:
- The representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client.
- There is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the practitioner’s responsibilities to another client.
A. 1 only
B. 2 only
C. 1 or 2
D. Neither 1 nor 2
C. 1 or 2
- According to Circular 230, Section 10.29(a), a conflict of interest exists if:
- The representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client OR
- There is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the practitioner’s responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person, or by a personal interest of the practitioner.
Barbara is an enrolled agent who only prepares tax returns. One of her clients was audited by the IRS and a substantial income tax deficiency resulted. Barbara was determined by the IRS to be a tax return preparer and a preparer penalty was assessed. Which of the following actions is available to Barbara?
A. Barbara can contest the validity of the penalty in Tax Court without making any payment of the penalty.
B. Barbara can contest the validity of the penalty in Tax Court by paying at least 15% of the assessed penalty.
C. Barbara can contest the validity of the penalty in District Court by paying at least 15% of the assessed penalty.
D. Barbara can contest the validity of the penalty in District Court without making any payment of the penalty.
C. Barbara can contest the validity of the penalty in District Court by paying at least 15% of the assessed penalty.
- Pursuant to IRC Section 6694(c), a preparer can contest the validity of a preparer penalty if they pay at least 15% of the assessed preparer penalty and fines within 30 days after the day on which notice, and demand of any penalty is made against the tax return preparer. Moreover, the preparer must file his or her claim for refund of the amount paid in the appropriate U.S. District Court.
- Therefore, Barbara can contest the validity of the penalty by filing a claim for refund in the U.S. District Court and by paying at least 15% of the assessed penalty.
Which of the following acts are seen under Circular 230 as incompetence and disreputable conduct for which a practitioner may be censured, suspended, or disbarred from practice before the IRS?
A. Conviction of any criminal offense under the revenue laws of the United States.
B. Criminal conviction under state law for embezzlement.
C. Conviction of any criminal offense involving dishonesty or breach of trust.
D. All of the answer choices are acts of incompetence and disreputable conduct.
D. All of the answer choices are acts of incompetence and disreputable conduct.
- Circular 230, Section 10.51, provides a list of actions that fall under the heading of incompetence and disreputable conduct. In general, incompetence and disreputable conduct for which a practitioner may be censured, suspended, or disbarred from practice before the IRS includes but is not limited to acts such as:
- Conviction of any criminal offense under the federal tax laws,
- Conviction of any criminal offense involving dishonesty or breach of trust,
- Conviction of any felony under federal or state law for which the conduct involved renders the practitioner unfit to practice before the Internal Revenue Service, or
- Giving false or misleading information or participating in any way in the giving of false or misleading information, to the Department of Treasury or any officer or employee thereof.
- Since embezzlement is an offense involving dishonesty or breach of trust, it would be considered disreputable conduct under item 2 above.
- See Circular 230, Section 10.51, for a complete list of all 18 actions.
Joseph Smith, an enrolled agent, has represented Stephen Francis before the Internal Revenue Service and also prepared returns for Stephen in each of the last 3 years. Stephen was divorced last year, and his ex-wife, Lindsay, stops by Joseph’s office and asks Joseph to represent her before the Internal Revenue Service with respect to the examination of her return that she filed separately from her husband in a year in which they were separated but not yet divorced. Which of the following actions may Joseph undertake?
A. Because the representation involves a tax return for which Lindsay filed separately, and Lindsay was separated at the time, Joseph may undertake the representation of Lindsay without considering whether a conflict of interest exists between Lindsay and her former spouse.
B. Since Lindsay filed separately, Joseph is free to undertake the representation of Lindsay.
C. Since Lindsay is divorced from Stephen, Joseph is free to undertake the representation of Lindsay.
D. Even though the representation involves a tax return for which Lindsay filed separately, and Lindsay was separated at the time, Joseph may not undertake the representation of Lindsay without considering whether a conflict of interest exists between Lindsay and her former spouse.
D. Even though the representation involves a tax return for which Lindsay filed separately, and Lindsay was separated at the time, Joseph may not undertake the representation of Lindsay without considering whether a conflict of interest exists between Lindsay and her former spouse.
- According to Circular 230, section 10.29(a), a conflict of interest exists if:
- The representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client, OR
- There is a significant risk that the representation of one or more clients will be materially limited by the practitioner’s responsibilities to another client, a former client or a third person, or by a personal interest of the practitioner.
- In this case, the representation of Stephen’s ex-wife by Joseph before the IRS on a tax return when the couple was not yet divorced could be directly adverse to Joseph, his current client. Hence, a conflict of interest is likely to exist between Lindsay and her former spouse.
What is the maximum prison sentence for willful attempt to evade or defeat tax?
A. 3 years.
B. 4 years.
C. 5 years.
D. 10 years.
C. 5 years.
- The maximum penalty for a willful attempt by an individual to evade or defeat tax is a $100,000 fine and/or five years in prison. For a corporation, there is no imprisonment, but the maximum fine is $500,000.
If a person is paid to prepare, assist in preparing, or review a tax return, then he or she must:
A. Sign the tax return and decide whether or not to provide the other information in the paid preparer’s area of the tax return.
B. Sign the tax return and provide the other information in the paid preparer’s area of the tax return.
C. Decide whether or not to sign the tax return but must provide the other information in the paid preparer’s area of the tax return.
D. Decide whether or not to sign the tax return and decide whether or not to provide the other information in the paid preparer’s area of the tax return.
B. Sign the tax return and provide the other information in the paid preparer’s area of the tax return.
- IRC Section 6695(c) states that any person who is a tax return preparer with respect to any return or claim for refund and who fails to comply with IRC Section 6109(a)(4) with respect to such return or claim shall pay a penalty of $55 for each failure, with a maximum penalty of $28,000 imposed with respect to each calendar year, unless it is shown that the failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect.
- IRC Section 6695(a) provides that any person who is an income tax return preparer with respect to any return or claim for refund who fails to furnish a copy of the tax return to the taxpayer (i.e., comply with IRC Section 6107(a)) shall pay a penalty of $55 for such failure, unless it is shown that such failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. The maximum penalty imposed under this subsection on any person with respect to documents filed during any calendar year shall not exceed $28,000 for 2023.
- Hence, a tax preparer must sign the tax return and provide the other information in the paid preparer’s area of the tax return.