Part 3: Preferential integration Flashcards

1
Q

What is preferential integration?

A

Economic integration that is based on discrimination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why preferential integration? (8)

A
  1. Better market access: free trade and preferential market access
  2. Deeper integration: more areas are covered than in WTO
  3. Put pressure on WTo members to do more (faster)
  4. Domino effects: the more countries that enter PTS, the more it costs to be outside PTA
  5. Gaining credability: trade agreements can help lock in politically sensitive areas
  6. Non economic objectives
  7. First mover advantage: new issues tend to reach ambitious PTS before reching WTO
  8. Easier to reach deal than in multilateral context
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is shallow and deep integration?

A

Newer version to positive vs negative int.
Shallow: trade agreements mainly regarding border measures
Deep: PTAs including rules on other domestic policies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What types of PTAs are there and what do they imply?

A

Free trade agreement (FTA):
- Members liberalize trade but maintain an independent external trade policy

Free trade agreement + (FTA+):
- FTA with both something extra, ex. some domestic policies or GATS free trade

Customs Union (CU):
- FTAwithin union as well as common policy againt RoW

Common Market:
Free internal movement of factors of production: labour and capital + often goods and services

Monetary Union:
- common currency

Fiscal Union:
- common fiscal policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the rules on PTAs? (WTO: GATT and GATS)

A

For goods trade two exeptions to MFN are allowed:
1. Reciprocal PTAs (FTAs and CUs), regulated through Article XXIV= they are allowed if trade barriers don’t rise towards RoW and PTA is notifies to the WTO

  1. Non-reciprocal PTAs (trade preferences with developing countries), covered by enabling clause

For GATS:
Article V GATS: Allowes for MFN to be violated as long as overall level of barriers towards non-reciprocates does not rise in the sectors that are covered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the atrting point to demonstrate preferential liberalization in a large country? (identical prodicivity)

How do we find Home’s import supply?
What will the initial equilibrium be?
What happens when Home imposes an MFN tariff?
What happens if Home enters PTA with Partner (only how we derive the curves) ?

A
  • 3 countries: Home (large importer), Partner (exporter) and Row (Exporter)
  • Partner and Row are identical -> same XS curves
  • Perfect comepetition
  • Free trade

Home’s MS: Partners XS + RoWs XS = Same intercept but a flatter curve
Initial equilibrium: MD=MS, Which will be P(ft), we find what Q Partner and RoW exports by dragging P(ft) to their XS curves

MFN tariff= applies to both partner and RoW

  • The MS curve will shift up by T -> MS(mfn) -> new equilibrium MS(mfn) = MD -> new price P’
  • Identical effects on Partner and RoW: lower border price P’-T and will export fewer units of the good.
  • Economic effects: Dom price goes up, Quantities of imports goes down, border price goes down, exports goes down (identical loss)
PTA with Partner: No tariff towards Partner
We find new MS curve by starting from the intercept of MS(mfn) -> P(a) 
1. Row must always pay tariff so border price will always be domestic price - T -> P(a)-T
- Row will only supply imports if domestic price above is P(a)
2. Partner does not pay tariff so it will face border price = domestic price, Will export if domestic price is above P(a). This mean that between P(a)-T and P(a), only Partner exports and at P(a) both start to export -> that is out new MS(pta) curve
3. We find new equilibrium in MD=MS(pta)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the ecoonomic and Welfare effects in the model describing a PTA between Home and Partner while still having a MFN tariff towards Row?

A

Economic Effects:
1. Domestic price in Home decreases
2.Quantity of imports increases
3, Border price for partner increases
4. Border price for RoW will ve Partner’s border price -T
5. Q of exports from Partner increases, Q of Exports from RoW decreases

Welfare Effects:
PArtners welfare increases, RoW welafre decreases
- Even though MFN tariff has not changed for Row, it is still a big disadvantage for them. For RoW free trade is best outcome, MFN is second best and PTA between Home and Partner is the worst
- Welfare in Home:
CS increases, PS decreases, Gov rev. ambiguous
net welfare is ambiguous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Initial Sit: Home importer, Partner and RoW are exporters w. identical XS
Home has PTA With Partner meaning that only RoW meets an MFN tariff, what happens is PTA i Reciprocal?
How do we do analysis?

A

To see this we do the same analysis but this time Parner is the importer.
Given that the exporting countries’ welfare increases, this makes the chances for overall welfare gain for Home even greater
It will be even worse for RoW

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is trade diversion?

A

=PTA-induced shift from low-cost production in third country to higher cost production in partner country

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is trade creation?

A

PTA induced shift from high cost production to lower cost production in partner country

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Show the preferential liberalization between Home (small country), A (low cost exporter) and B (high cost exporter)
Perfect comp and constant returns
initial sit: MFN tariff for both A and B
Graph with P and Q
- What will border price and domestic price be?
- What will the XS curves be?

What to prices, production, consumption, imports and tariff revenue if:
- PTA with A?
- PTA with B?
Compare welafre effects of both PTAs

A

Since A and B are not identical, they charge diffrent prices where P(a) is lower than P(b)
Home is small -> can’t affect prices
Therfore A and B’s price levels can be interpreted as their XS curves (flat line)
Domestic prices will be P(a)+T and P(b)+T
Since A has lower price, all imports will be from A

PTA with A:

  • New domestc price will be P(a)
  • Border price: P(a)
  • Home production decreases (trade creation)
  • Home conusmption increases
  • imports increases
  • All tariff revenue is lost

PTA with B:

  • Domestic price decreases from P(a)+T -> P(b)
  • Home production decreases (trade creation)
  • Home consumption increases
  • Imports increases
  • Imports from A are interly replaced with B import.: Trade diversion
  • Border price increases from P(a) to P(b)
  • All tariff revenue is lost

Welfare:

  • PTA with A= Home in unambiguously better of
  • PTA with B= Ambiguous results since trade diversion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is trade deflection?

Solutions?

A

Trade deflections happen in FTAs when a third country want to enter market. Since Countries in FTAs can set their own tariff levels to foreign countries, a third country can deflect this by going through the an FTA country with lower tariffs and after that access the countries with higher tariffs without having to pay tariffs.

Solution:

  1. Border control between FTA countries (Rules of Origin)
    - Though it crates frictional costs
    - can add production costs
  2. Customs union rather than PTA
    - countries lose sovreighnty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the formula for markup?

A

μ = P - MC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What question does the COMP curve anwser, what is the relationship?

A

Ansers questions: “given a number of firms, what mark-up will the firms charge
- negative relationship between mark-up and number of firms. The more firms the more competition, more competition equals less market power which leads to smaller mark-up.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What question does BE curve answer?

A

For a given level of mark-up, how many firms can break-even?
Positive relationship: if we have a high level of mark-up, many firms can break-even, since they need to produce less to survive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the assumptions in BE-COMP diagram?
What is operating profit?
How does BE-COMP diagram work?
When are we in long-term E?

A
  • All firms are identical
  • Size of market is given (for a given BE curve)
  • Increasing returns to scale: MC is fixed, Fixed cost

Operating profit: mark-up * x
x = sales per firm

We must always be on the COMP curve since firms can react quickly and change prices if number if firms changes.
We can be off BE-curve in short term: If markup is higher than break even lever, there is a profit -> new firms will enter market.
Long term E is BE=COMP, no gains and no loses

17
Q

What happens in BE-Comp diagram when we introduce trade? Assuming two identical countries

A

We will now have twice as many competitirs, but we also have twice as many consumers -> This will make the BE-curves slope will become flatter -> new equilibrium that is more to the right. This new equilibrium will lead to some firms having to leave market.

Conclusions-

  1. Fewer firms than before trade
  2. Though more options than before trade, consumer choices increase
  3. prices decrease
  4. total cnsumption increases
  5. firms are bigger than before
18
Q

What happen is there is perfect or partial collusion i BE-COMP

A

Perfect: All firms will cooperate as one firm -> n=1
Comp curve will be a straight line intersect with BE-curve. Anythng along that line can be the mark-up they choose to have’
- Incentives to cheat

Partial:
Decreasing COMP-curve between Perfect collusion and normal comp-curve. This will lead to a bit higher mark-up

19
Q

Whata re 4 trends in economic int?

A
  1. deeper agreements
  2. complicated agreements take more time to negotiate
  3. Disintegration
  4. PTA over multilateral int since WTO is a bit stuck