Part 3 Flashcards
Boy gets new skin case 2015
Gene correcting skin
doctors took stem cells, corrected a faulty mutation within them and then put back in skin
80% replace
- severe injuries
- Syrian refugee, admitted as paediatric burn
Epidermolysis bullosa (EB)
Genetic disorders
~1 in 50,000 live births- life expectancy
Spontaneous skin blistering
Painful and life-threatening complications- prone to bacterial infection
“Butterfly children”
High risk of skin cancer- unsure why
Skin blistering
epidermis peel off dermis
usually closely attached
Due to the basement membrane usually Structural adhesion, resistance to shearing
BUT Not in patient
Why does the BM allow structural adhesion
TM receptor A664 interacts with laminins- interact with collagen - very structured - adhere absence/ mutations effects interaction
Case study: The Patient
Splice site mutation within intron 14 of LAMB3
Skin blistering since birth
Infection
Most areas of skin denuded
Normal treatments for EB
antibiotics to stop sepsis
skin transplant for denuded skin
end of life treatment
A case study published in 2006: treatment one off
A one-off compassionate treatment- he was going to die
Only a small area of the skin was treated
correction of junction EB by transplantation of genetically modified epidermal stem cells
Why is it not developed?
No legislation
all procedures done under certain GMP rules
trying to work around this
Why wouldn’t autologous cell therapy work?
Isnt enough skin as genetic disease
cells have faulty disease
needed addition or alternative
Gene therapy
Aims to repair or replace a mutated gene
Ex vivo versus in vivo
Vectors: viral versus non-viral
Ex and in vivo
Ex= cells taken from patient manipulated in culture and replaced back In= corrected version of gene is attempted inside body
Gene therapy strategy for LAMB3
A retroviral vector expressing the full-length LAMB3 cDNA
took correct sequence of gene- put in DNA- not correcting mutation itself but deliver correct DNA
Ex vivo steps
JEB patient
Feeder layers- 8 days and split
another 3 days with Lamb3 - keratinocyte transduction
another 5 days
PGc analysis- Sequencing analysis
Deliver correct version of gene so integrate randomly
Feeder layers
layers of mitotically manipulated cells for kerintocytes
Problems with integration of the corrected mutation
Look at where gene has integrated
gene area= integration sites on exons, very little genes composed on exons
look if any were oncogenes or tumour suppressor= they weren’t
hard to predict integration
Different ways of preparing skin substitutes in the ex vivo gene and cell therapy
Prepare skin substitutes
tested 2 different conditions- plastic and fibrin
3 different areas of body
fibrin worked best- 3000 cm^2 transplantation of transduced graft
Patient follow up
took number of biopsies of skin- in situ, next gen, global analysis
epidermis= regenerated in patient- didn’t come from modified
What is the epidermis made up of
genetically modified cells
expressional cadherins
- expression only in transduced cells
add cadherin to tell whether the layers have fused
Keratinocytes present= one transduced with virus so also express the right version of laminin and adhere to the dermis
epidermal-dermal junction after cell therapy
Nice expression of laminin after admission and 4 months
21 months no blistering stick together nicely
Lmab3 expressed
Difference in the mutated and genetically corrected keratinocytes
Laminin332-B3 null and corrected
difference in adhesive properties of mutant patient-derived and genetically corrected keratinocytes
EB boy now
Nice appearance of skin
Not red
stitches with no blistering
Summary of EB study
- boy EB- results in chronic wounds to skin
- Biopsy- skin cells were taken from an area of body not affected
- mutated gene fixed
- develop in vitro of the corrected cells
- large sheets of transgenic epidermis cultivated
- entire wounded area of the boys body was treated with grafts
- regenerated dermis adhered firmly
Considerations for further work
Longer-term follow up of the patient Further clinical studies Alternative gene editing strategies Patient age Discolouration of skin- no melanin in- add this q
Human skin construct
- immunity
- pigmentation
- appendages
- hypodermis
- innervation
6.. vascularization
Skin made up of all these things so tissue regeneration is hard to recreate
Primary research article
Bioengineering 3D integumentary organ system from IPS cells using in vitro transplantation model
- Fabrication of the 3D skin and its appendages could contribute to regenerative therapies
- Difficult to recreate in vitro
- Hypothesis: pluripotent stem cells can be used to mimic the developmental patterning
Experimental approach of IPS skin constructs
Induction of epithelial tissues via the Clustering-dependent EB (CDB) transplantation approach
Day 0- sorting IPS cells
Day 7- in vitro transplantation of CDB method
Day 30- in vivo organogenesis
Analysis of the bioengineered hair follicle
The hair shaft – from iPSCs
reflected the original mouse they derived the IPS mouse from
WNT3B stimulated
Analysis of hair follicle in IPSC bioengineered 3D ios
The isolated cystic structures with hair follicles were observed macroscopically
Transplantation of the bioengineered 3D integumentary organ system
In vitro organized integumentary organ system derived from male IPS cells
add to female SCID mouse
intracutaneously transplantation
orthotopic hair function
*IPS hair follicles had a correct structure and connect with local tissues
The significance of the hair follicle study
Fully functional iPSC-derived explants included:
hair follicles and sebaceous glands with proper connections to the epithelium, dermis, fat, arrector pili muscles and nerve fibers
A step towards complete reconstruction of skin
Disease modeling using skin substitutes
Epidermolysis bullosa Vitiligo Psoriasis Skin cancer Allergic contact dermatitis
Psoriasis
Chronic inflammatory skin disease
Red plaques on the skin
Keratinocyte hyperproliferation,immune cell infiltration, increased angiogenesis
In vitro psoriasis models
2nd model- Patient keratinocytes, Cytokines (TNFa, IL-1a, IL-17, IL22)
3rd model- Keratinocytes and fibroblasts, Cytokines
Companies to start in vitro testing of chemicals
l’Oreal
Peripheral nerve injuries
9000 cases in the UK per year
Mainly in young population
Main cause: car accidents
Financial, healthcare and societal burden
Central NS approaches
Approaches developed but lagging behind
clinical trial for human pluripotent stem cells with adrenergic transported into parkinsons disease patietns
Peripheral NS
Major somatic
sensory and motor pathways to the extremities- ulnar, median, cervical, femoral etc
Peripheral Nerve Anatomy
Axons are surrounded by myelinating Schwann cells and are enclosed by endoneurium
Individual axons are bound together by perineurium to form fascicles
Epineurium groups fascicles, creating the nerve cable
Types of peripheral nerve injury
- Elongation
The connective tissue of nerves allows 10-20% elongation before structural damage occurs.
Severe lesions that disrupt the axon. - Laceration
30% of nerve injuries. - Compression
External mechanical pressure on the conductive membrane.
Grade 1 of peripheral nerve injury
1) NEUROPRAXIA
No/little structural damage, no loss of nerve continuity
Symptoms are transient, reversible
Entrapment neuropaties
Grade 2 of peripheral nerve injury
2) AXONOTMESIS
Complete interruption of the axon and its myelin sheath
Perineurium and epineurium intact
Grade 3 of peripheral nerve injury
3) NEUROTMESIS
Nerve and the surrounding stroma are completely disconnected
No spontaneous recovery
Weakness and atrophy
Wallerian degeneration
Injury- axons of distal end cut away from cell body, start of degeneration because protease activity
cytoskeleton disintegrate and break
Peripheral nerve after injury
2 weeks- Wallerian degradation, degrading fibres and myelin sheath
3 weeks- proliferating schwann cells, axonal sprout penetrating band of bungner- atrophied muscle
3 months- successful nerve regeneration- muscle regeneration
Neuronal regeneration in CNS
Macrophages infiltrate much more slowly, delaying the removal of inhibitory myelin
“Reactive astrocytes” produce glial scars that inhibit regeneration
Differences in PNS vs. CNS injury
In PNS: repair of damage is actively promoted
In CNS: repair of damage is inhibited
CNS and PNS require different regenerative medicine strategies
More success in PNS thus far
Approaches of neuronal tissue repair in PNS
- surgical reconstruction
- Grafts
- nerve conduits
surgical reconstruction
put stumps of nerve back together only possible if close enough together Tension reduces blood flow: Blood flow reduces by 50% when the nerve is stretched 8% Complete ischemia at 15%
Grafts
- autologous
- same person
+ low risk
- loss of function at donor site, 2 surgeries required, limit to size and type - allogeneic- same species donor
+ no secondary surgery, no loss of function at donor site
- higher risk of rejection, limit availability
Nerve conduits
Guide regenerating axons
Prevent infiltration of scar tissue
Increase concentration of intraluminal proteins
Peripheral nerve regeneration through a nerve conduit
Hours- conduit fills with plasma
Days- fibrin cable forms
Months- cell migration and axonal regeneration
Years- resulting tissue is notably thinner
Properties of ideal nerve conduits
Plasma pass through
porous
long term degradability