Parol Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

Parol Evidence

A

Allows to introduce evidence of agreements or terms not put into the express contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Parol Evidence: The Big Question

A

Is the writing Integrated?

  • Is it complete integration?
  • Is it partial integration?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Integrated

A

Final (as opposed to in negotiation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When is Parol Evidence allowed?

A

When there is partial integration.

NOT complete integration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mitchill v. Lath

A

Even though the icehouse does not contradict the writing, it is the sort of thing we assume would have been part of the deal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Mitchill Test

A

Agreement must be:

  1. collateral
  2. Not contradict written contract
  3. Be one the parties would not ordinarily be expected to embody in the writing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Collateral

A

separate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Masterson v. Sine

A

We should exclude evidence only if the factfinder will be misled

  • We need to find a reason someone would have left something out of the writing

most courts would reject

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Integrated Agreements

A

A final agreement in writing

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

2-202

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How consistent do terms need to be to not contradict?

A

UCC: reasonable harmony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly