Parliament - FUNCTIONS Scrutiny in the Commons by Committees Flashcards
Different forms of scrutiny
THREE WAYS: Committees, questions, debates.
PMQTs, Minister’s Question Time, Written questions, legislative scrutiny, vote of no confidence, Select committees.
Select Committees
a group of members from all parties, elected by fellow MPs to scrutinise the government, usually from specific departments such as Treasury/Education.
What are Public Bill Committees?
Public Bill Committees scrutinise proposed legislation and offer amendments to the wording of the Bills. They are criticised for being too partisan because Whips select who + what MPs sit on the committee, and so they are expected to follow party ideology.
They can ask individuals with expertise in certain areas to give oral/written evidence - select committees
introduced in 1979 to monitor the performance and effectiveness of departments within the government. Can also investigate specific policy requirements. Usually 11 members and is non-partisan.
What is parliamentary privilege and exclusive cognisance?
parliamentary privilege: this protects MPs from being sued for libel/publishing false statement/defamation. This gives those in the Commons freedom of speech.
This also gives Parliament exclusive cognisance, which is the right to control its own internal affairs without outside interference.
what are the Departmental Select committees?
Select committees are held in the committee rooms in the Palace of Westminster - they usually meet once every week and take evidence in the public.
Departmental Select Committees: specialise in the work of on government department e.g. Education Select Committee scrutinises the Education Department.
what is the Liaison committee?
this committee advises on powers and the role of the select committees and often calls on the PM to give account.
This group only meets annually, and this is where all the chairs of each departmental select committee can question the PM. In 2021, Johnson has confirmed three sessions this year.
What did the Wright Reform 2009 do?
the chair of each committee is now elected by backbenchers in an anonymous vote, whereas previously, they were chosen by the party chief whip.
How is committee work more effective than debates within the chamber?
debates in the commons are not very long - select committees can devote weeks and months to thoroughly discuss an issue. Reports that are produced are based on vast sources of evidence that any of the members can collate.
they offer large amounts of evidence and reasoning to Parliament/our government.
increase the efficiency of the law published - regardless of political ideology behind it.
public officials, civil servants, and those who are affected in those topics are asked questions and answers are given directly = legitimate.
they follow evidence.
how are members selected?
the chair is elected by their fellow MPs in an anonymous vote, but parties elect their own select committee members e.g. labour and cons MPs vote for fellow lab or cons MPs.
how do select committees work?
clarks prepare for the committee - they help digest the provided evidence, work with the committee to prepare drafts for the report, and ultimately publish the report.
they can select topics from news agendas, departmental issues, or just random issues that members are passionate about.
when the topic is confirmed, the committee members draft a list of questions that are publicised in a call for evidence, which is usually done via a press release, social media is also used.
those submitting written evidence will also be asked to join the meeting to offer oral evidence. There are usually 6 of these evidence sessions before they are asked more questions based on the evidence they submit.
Liaison Committee
17th November 2021
- Boris Johnson gave evidence to the Committee in a discussion about propriety and ethics in Government, VAWG, COP26, and the budget review.
- 15 chairs attended the committee meeting!
- Much more in depth discussion rather than the rapidity of the PMQTs
what is the outcome of the work done?
once the report is published, the government must respond in 8 weeks and this is published to the public - dependent on their response, the committee can decide to investigate issues further.
they are vital for the scrutiny against the government because it not only assures us that the parliamentary process is at its best, but it is also concerned with the real-life impact of the legislation which is important.
what are some other examples of select committees in action?
Brittin and Murdock
February 2016 = Matt Brittin, the lead spokesman for Google (chief executive herd of Google Europe), did not disclose his salary and was grilled by the chair - you don’t know how much you get paid?
he said if it’s relevant, he will answer later - this was because he was accused of defending Google’s tax evasion, stating that even if they wanted, they would not be able to pay more.
Rupert Murdoch - hearing at the Culture Select Committee - the most humble day of my life - the Select Committee re-opened its phone-hacking inquiry for a second time in July last year after the revelation that the News of the World had hacked a murdered school girl (Milly Dowler)’s iPhone in 2011.
advantages 1
expertise
chairs can be really high quality - MPs can select experts within their department such as Sarah Wollaston 2014-2019 (chair of the Health Committee). She is a former GP and has close ties with the BMA as they met in 2018 to discuss failures in acknowledging patient and doctor trust in the Memorandum of Understanding.
advantages 2
devote significant time
select committees can devote as much time as they’d like into certain topics and investigations = Windrush scandal - Home Affairs select committee invited Rudd to give evidence for its enquiry.
She denied the Home Office had targets for deportation of illegal immigrants - leaked Emails suggested that there were targets and that she was aware of them. She resigned in 2018.
weaknesses 1
the government is not required to listen
the government does not have to adhere to the report published - they must respond in 8 weeks, but they do not have to act on the committee’s recommendations.
30-40% of the reports were listened to in 2015.
Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee said that ministers turn a bind eye to allegations of Russian disruption in the election? The government had not sought evidence of successful interference in the UK democratic process.