Parliament Flashcards
Legislature
The body that has the power to make, revoke and change laws. Has the role of scrutinising the executive and holding them to account
Executive
The body that runs the country and proposes laws to the legislature
Judiciary
The body that interprets and applied the law. It does this to uphold the rule of law in society
What is confidence and supply?
In the event of a minority government, the government can rely on a limited agreement with another party to keep itself in office
The HoC can veto legislation
The HoL can only delay legislation for a year (Parliament Act 1949)
The HoC can amend legislation
The HoL can amend legislation, but needs Commons approval (ping-pong)
The HoC can reject any legislation, even manifesto pledges
Salisbury Convention - The HoL does not vote against manifesto pledges. Not the case for coalition govt
The HoC approves govt budget
The HoL has no jurisdiction over financial matters
The HoC can dismiss a govt under extreme circumstances with a vote of no confidence
The HoL has no power to dismiss a government
Factors that determine the HoL as more effective than the HoC?
- Party Discipline
- Legislation
- Scrutiny
- Expertise
Party discipline in the HoL?
- Weaker in the Lords, more independent
- More freedom for peers to debate and express views
- Defeated the coalition government 48 times between 2010 and 2012, while the Commons did not defeat the executive on any proposed legislation
Scrutiny in the HoL?
HoL more effective than HoC
Spend most of the time scrutinising legislation, unlike MPs in commons. Between 2010 and 2015 the Lords voted against reforms to constituency boundaries, NHS, HoL, AV referendum and caps on welfare payments
Legislation in the HoL?
Lords more effective than HoC
Govt has lost some legislation to the Lords e.g. Tax credits, Welfare reform. Lords defeated the govt in 2013 over its plans to cut legal aid
Expertise in the HoL?
HoL more effective than HoC
Lords more effective in its scrutinising role for checking the govt than the Commons. Many appointed due to their expertise e.g Lord Walton, former President of the BMA
Factors that determine the HoC is more effective than the HoL
- Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949
- Committees
- Salisbury Convention
- Scrutiny
- Legitimacy and representation of constituents
- Media
Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949 (HoC)
Made Lords less powerful than Commons. Preventing them from rejecting legislation and only allowing them to delay for a year. E.g. Lords forced a delay in the Hunting Act 2004
Committees (HoC)
HoC more effective than HoL
The Commons selects committees have grown in influence and authority, more effective in scrutinising government departments e.g.Health Committee brought about changes to the coalition’s Health and Social Care Bill
Scrutiny (HoC)
Lords less effective in scrutinising the government. PM’s Questions and ministerial question time only happen in the commons. Allows the Commons to directly scrutinise the government
Impact of the Media (HoC)
HoC more effective than HoL
Media still concentrates more on the Commons and it’s role in making government accountable
Salisbury Convention (HoC)
Convention means that the Lords does not try to vote down a government bill mentioned in an election manifesto