Parenting. Flashcards
Parenting in Emperor Penguins (Antarctica)
Adaptive challenges of a very harsh climate.
Pair bonding facilitates biparental care.
K-selection ?
few offspring, high parental care investment in each one (offspring).
- extreme e.g. = kangaroo - have one joey (at a time), put in their pocket.
R-selection
many offspring, but low PI; quantity is often offset by high predation.
- extreme e.g. = frogs - lay an extremely large number of eggs. - still a lot of diversity in frogs - swallow their offspring to protect them.
Parental care is costly to parents (opportunity costs of mating, feeding selves, etc.)
- For months after birth, they cannot do anything for themselves at all. why are humans are essentially born premature?
- Width of pelvic cavity = compromise between neonatal head size and requirements of bipedalism (Gruss & Schmitt, 2015).
- Pelvic cavity is engaged in a tradeoff with the timing of the birth of the infant. - If the baby stayed in the womb longer, its head would be larger and could start to interfere with locomotion and other physiological processes.
Why are men’s PI usually less than womens?
Female PI was more essential for offspring survival in the past. - e.g. gestation, lactation, ability to emotionally interact with the child.
Women’s adaptations for parental care?
- Compared to men, women display superior theory of infant mind.
- Better at recognising infant facial expressions, especially negative emotions (Hampson et al., 2006).
- Compared to nulliparous women, new mothers display greater activation in ToM regions (Zhang et al., 2020).
- In new mothers, higher activation in brain regions involved in (a) facial expression processing, and (b) empathy and mentalising.
‘Tend and befriend’ (Taylor et al., 2000) to deal with stressful situations - alternative stress reaction to flight or fight. - if children are around, they will focus on protecting and calming the children.
- establish a social network.
Why does mens PI tend to be less than womens?
- Mating opportunity cost - as sexual selection and PI theory predicts, this should be higher for males (because they have more to gain from multiple mating as they can reproduce faster)
Why is mens PI generally lower?
- When male to female sex ratio is higher
- Among more attractive males
- When the population density is high (in birds as well as humans)
- Paternity uncertainty is another reason -
The EEA for parenting adaptations, females always had 100% certainty of parentage, men never did
Paternity certainty and facial resemblance.
- Emotional closeness reported by fathers, but not mothers, predicted by facial resemblance to self
- Facial resemblance to self predicted higher PI in fathers but not mothers
Regardless of resemblance, relatives are much more likely to say the baby resembles the father more than the mother, especially when the father is present, especially with the mothers family (Daly & Wilson, 1982). - strategy of encouraging PI from father.
Effort to promote paternity certainty.
adaptations for parental care should be sensitive to three areas
Genetic relatedness: Are children really my own?
Can offspring convert parental care into fitness? - how likely is the infant to survive?
Could investment be better spent in some alternative way? - kin altruism?
Cross-culturally, men invest more when -
- In their own genetic children than step children
When they are more sure of partner fidelity (Apicella and Marlowe).
When the child’s mother is a current mate (Gray and Anderson, 2010).
Parental care is a form of mating effort.
most important risk factor for child abuse/murder?
step-parenthood.
Abuse of unrelated children
Not an adaptation to abuse/kill children.
But some species do have this adaptation.
Infanticide by males in lions and monkeys.
Congenitally abnormal children are on average
At higher risk of abuse (daly and wilson, 1981).
Recipients of less parental care, because they’re more often )
institutionalised (Census Bureau, 1978).
Recipients of less positive attention from mothers (Mann, 1992).
On the other hand, women with abundant resources actually invest more in higher risk (premature) infants (Beaulieu and Bugental, 2008).
And congenitally abnormal children of course often inspire intense PI
Risk of being killed by genetic parents is the highest for infants, then decreases steadily
I.e, risk correlates negatively with reproductive value - the older you get, the more likely it is that you will survive.
In a sense, they value their children more in terms of their ability to survive.
Not due to the child becoming better able to defend themselves - reverse trend is seen with the risk of being killed by nonrelatives (older kids more likely to be killed).