Paper 3: General Ethics questions (past papers, GLR notes) Flashcards
what is the definition of fit and proper
A person who displays the characteristics of honesty, integrity and reliability
what is a conflict of interest
anything which will likely affect your judgment adversely in advising or representing your client
what is legal professional privilege
A rule of evidence that an attorney may not disclose to the Court without the consent of the client, information given to him for purpose of legal advice or representation.
what are the circumstances under which an attorney may decline a mandate
(1) lack of expertise/qualification/experience
(2) danger of a conflict of interest
(3) mandate to do or assist in the doing of something illegal or improper
Colleague A has a client who seems to have a good and substantial claim for damages arising from a motor collision but cannot afford litigation. What kind of arrangement can you recommend, what are the requirements and what is the maximum fee A can charge.
A contingency fee arrangement governed by the Contingency Fee Act 66 of 1997
An attorney may not recover more than double his normal fee, or up to a maximum of 25% of the total amount awarded, whichever is the lesser
For what purpose was the legal practitioners fidelity fund established
The fund was established to reimburse members of the public who suffer financial loss due to theft by an attorney his employee or candidate of money or property entrusted to that attorney.
It appears that the bank which held trust money ito s86(2) was liquidated. What is a client’s right of recourse against?
(1) the bank
(2) the LPFF
(3) the attorney who held the trust money
(4) Would the attorney have a claim against the LPFF?
(1) the trust creditor cannot claim against the bank as it is not the bank’s customer
(2) there can be no claim against the fund as this loss is not covered by the LPFF
(3) the attorney is liable to make good on any trust shortfall. If the bank goes insolvent, he would be liable to repay all the money due to the trust creditors
(4) No, the attorney must institute a claim as a concurrent creditor in the insolvent estate of the bank
What should an attorney do if they discover that he has negligently allowed a claim for damages to prescribe?
(1) inform the client at once
(2) advise the client to consult another attorney on his rights in relation to the prescribed claim and subsequent action
(3) not admit liability in order not to vitiate insurance cover with LPIIF and private insurers
(4) report the full facts to the LPIFF and private insureers
(5) consider whether it may be wise to settle the matter himself if the amount is not too high and there may be contributory negligence
(6) co-operate with attorneys for insurers
(7) Do not need to report to LPC but if there is a complaint - must respond
What should a client do if their attorney has negligently allowed a damages claim to prescribe?
(1) terminate the mandate immediately, collect file from attorney, get legal advice from a new attorney
(2) instruct new attorney to send letter of demand to previous attorney
(3) inform the LPC in his region of the claim
(4) await an approach from the attorneys or the LPIIF to seek settlement of the claim
(5) if there is an undue delay issue summons against the negligent attorney for damages
(6) consider any offers of payment or settlement from the attorney or the LPIIF taking into account contributory negligence
In which of the following ways can an attorney assist a crucial but unsophisticated and indigent witness you intend to call in a culpable homicide trial
(1) provide her with money for fare to ensure attendance
(2) interview her before a trial so she will be more at ease when she testifies
(3) prepare an affidavit of her testimony which she will then verify before court
(4) give her examples of questions you might ask during a trial
All actions allowed
X wishes to know exactly how to perform his duties when a person deposes to an affidavit before him in his capacity as Commissioner of Oaths
(1) satisfied to identity of the deponent
(2) ask whether D knows and understands content
(3) whether D has objection to taking prescribed oath
(4) ask D whether he/she regards oath as binding on conscience
(5) If the D cannot take oath, must make a solemn declaration
(6) Oath/ declaration signed in front of COO and COO also signs
(7) COO certificate added
(8) affidavit contains full names, physical address and authority of COO
At which tribunal, forum or office would you or your client seek relief in respect of:
(1) excessive fee charged by an attorney in a criminal trial
(2) trust money stolen by an attorney
(3) loss due to professional negligence by an attorney
(1) The Law Society (Assessment Panel)
(2) the Attorneys Fidelity Fund and Law Society
(3) sue the attorney in the appropriate court, attorney may approach the LPIIF and his own private indemnity insurers
Before the start of a criminal trial in which you will represent the accused, you discover that the magistrate is the mother of the complainant. How would you apply the applicable rule of conduct and what will you do if you are unsuccessful?
The magistrate must recuse herself.
First, inform her in chambers that you will apply for recusal.
If she declines, apply in open court
If she still refuses you, then you continue.
If your client is acquitted, there is no harm done, if the client is convicted - you will have grounds for review.
You negligently allow a claim for damages to prescribe :
(1) what is the effect of prescription?
(2) what should you advise your client?
(3) what can you do for your own position?
(1) The claim is extinguished and becomes unenforceable. Payments may be validly received but a summons is open to a special plea.
(2) Client must seek independent advice but you must not admit liability
(3) you must inform the LPIFF and your private insurers of any claims and pay the excess deductible. You do not need to inform the Law Society but you must respond to any complaint
What are the grounds that would entitle an attorney to withdraw as an attorney and terminate his client’s mandate
Lewis:
(1) improper conduct on the party of the client
(2) client deliberate fraud
(3) attorney personality clashes with client
(4) client does not accept attorney’s advice
(5) failure to pay
(6) failure to give instructions
(7) illness of attorney
is it permissible for a legal practitioner to act as such in the collection of a debt due to a person of whom he/she is the curator bonis, defended not/defended
You may act unless some conflict is apparent. it is wiser to appoint an indpeendent attorney.
is it permissible for a legal practitioner to defend a claim against a deceased estate in which he/she is the executor
You may but it is not desirable
Is it permissible for a legal practitioner to act for both parties in an antenuptial contract
You may unless negotiations become tricky, bargaining power is clearly unequal or assets are vastly different
Is it permissible for a legal practitioner to sue a colleague?
You may but professional courtesy requires you to personally inform the colleague beforehand.
Is it permissible for a legal practitioner to start acting for a client who is unhappy with the services of a colleague in a litigious matter?
You should not start acting for the client until you have spoken to the colleague regarding release of the file, payment of costs unless the delay would cause irreparable harm.
Is it permissible for a legal practitioner to divulge confidential information about a client to client’s executor, curator or trustee?
In the case of a executor or curator this would be permissible as it is normally in the interests of the client. But it is not usually permissible in the case of a trustee as it may be detrimental.
Is it permissible for a legal practitioner to act for both parties in a divorce matter where the parties have separate assets, income, no children and occupy leased property if they consent in writing being aware of the potential conflicts?
Yes. There should not be a dispute about assets, custody does not arise. If unforeseen conflict does arise, you would withdraw from both parties. In principle you may act.
what is the difference between overreaching and overcharging
overreaching is abusing the ignorance of another in recovering excessive amounts from clients or debtors containing an element of impropriety.