Paper 3: Fieldwork Flashcards
PHYSICAL: what is the aim of your fieldwork investigation?
To investigate the changes downstream in the river at Carding Mill Valley
PHYSICAL: describe one method of data collection.
- Choose 10 sites along the river by stratified sampling, where you think you will see downstream change (such as after tributaries)
- On each site, measure a 10m stretch of river
- Drop a dog biscuit in at the start of this stretch and start a stopwatch
- Stop the stopwatch when the biscuit reaches the end of the 10m stretch
- Repeat this measurement three times and take the mean time
PHYSICAL: why was this method of data collection suitable?
- Simple
- Fast
- Cheap
- Environmentally friendly
PHYSICAL: how could you improve your method of data collection?
- Use a flow meter (this was too expensive and the water often too shallow)
PHYSICAL: what method of data presentation was used and why?
- Scatter graph with line of best fit – distance downstream agains velocity
- Both variables continuous
- Easy to interpret
- We are trying to observe a trend
- Line of best fit can overlook anomalies, however
PHYSICAL: how valid were your results?
- Stratified sampling could lead to biased choices of sites (we only measured the upper course), so this could be unrepresentative of how the Carding Mill Valley river changes as a whole – less valid
- Suitable variables such as velocity change and discharge were measured to assess change, leading to more valid conclusions
PHYSICAL: how reliable were your results?
- The results were not all taken at the same time – they are not repeatable (external factors could’ve changed between readings) – less reliable
- The method was simple, so human error was minimised – more reliable
HUMAN: what is the aim of this fieldwork investigation?
To investigate the redevelopment of inner city Birmingham
HUMAN: describe one method of data collection.
- Use stratified sampling to choose 4 sites – 3 redeveloped, 1 not
- For each site, stand in a random location and rate the environment on 12 qualities (such as air pollution, greenery, noise pollution and litter) on a bi-polar scale of -2 to 2.
HUMAN: why was this method of data collection suitable?
- Quick
- Cheap
- Simple
HUMAN: how could you improve your method of data collection?
- Use instrumental measures of environmental quality, such as to detect pollution levels, or to use a sound level meter for noise pollution.
HUMAN: what method of data presentation was used and why?
- Radar diagrams
- It allows easy comparison of multivariate data – multiple quantitative pieces of data (bipolar ratings) of multiple places on the same diagram
- Easy visual comparisons
HUMAN: how valid were your results?
- Only one non-redeveloped site was chosen, meaning it could not be representative of all non-redeveloped areas of inner city Birmingham
- By using stratified sampling, we made sure we looked at good examples of redeveloped sites and non-redeveloped sites to make our data as representative as possible of our aim, despite the small sample size
- We only stood in one spot per location, so this may be unrepresentative of the location as a whole and decrease validity
HUMAN: how reliable were your results?
- Since the measurements were subjective, our results could be less reliable, as different people doing the same experiment could get different results
- The assessments were done at slightly different times of the day for each location – this makes them less reliable