Paper 3: Fieldwork Flashcards

1
Q

PHYSICAL: what is the aim of your fieldwork investigation?

A

To investigate the changes downstream in the river at Carding Mill Valley

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

PHYSICAL: describe one method of data collection.

A
  • Choose 10 sites along the river by stratified sampling, where you think you will see downstream change (such as after tributaries)
  • On each site, measure a 10m stretch of river
  • Drop a dog biscuit in at the start of this stretch and start a stopwatch
  • Stop the stopwatch when the biscuit reaches the end of the 10m stretch
  • Repeat this measurement three times and take the mean time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

PHYSICAL: why was this method of data collection suitable?

A
  • Simple
  • Fast
  • Cheap
  • Environmentally friendly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

PHYSICAL: how could you improve your method of data collection?

A
  • Use a flow meter (this was too expensive and the water often too shallow)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

PHYSICAL: what method of data presentation was used and why?

A
  • Scatter graph with line of best fit – distance downstream agains velocity
  • Both variables continuous
  • Easy to interpret
  • We are trying to observe a trend
  • Line of best fit can overlook anomalies, however
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

PHYSICAL: how valid were your results?

A
  • Stratified sampling could lead to biased choices of sites (we only measured the upper course), so this could be unrepresentative of how the Carding Mill Valley river changes as a whole – less valid
  • Suitable variables such as velocity change and discharge were measured to assess change, leading to more valid conclusions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

PHYSICAL: how reliable were your results?

A
  • The results were not all taken at the same time – they are not repeatable (external factors could’ve changed between readings) – less reliable
  • The method was simple, so human error was minimised – more reliable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

HUMAN: what is the aim of this fieldwork investigation?

A

To investigate the redevelopment of inner city Birmingham

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

HUMAN: describe one method of data collection.

A
  • Use stratified sampling to choose 4 sites – 3 redeveloped, 1 not
  • For each site, stand in a random location and rate the environment on 12 qualities (such as air pollution, greenery, noise pollution and litter) on a bi-polar scale of -2 to 2.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

HUMAN: why was this method of data collection suitable?

A
  • Quick
  • Cheap
  • Simple
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

HUMAN: how could you improve your method of data collection?

A
  • Use instrumental measures of environmental quality, such as to detect pollution levels, or to use a sound level meter for noise pollution.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

HUMAN: what method of data presentation was used and why?

A
  • Radar diagrams
  • It allows easy comparison of multivariate data – multiple quantitative pieces of data (bipolar ratings) of multiple places on the same diagram
  • Easy visual comparisons
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

HUMAN: how valid were your results?

A
  • Only one non-redeveloped site was chosen, meaning it could not be representative of all non-redeveloped areas of inner city Birmingham
  • By using stratified sampling, we made sure we looked at good examples of redeveloped sites and non-redeveloped sites to make our data as representative as possible of our aim, despite the small sample size
  • We only stood in one spot per location, so this may be unrepresentative of the location as a whole and decrease validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

HUMAN: how reliable were your results?

A
  • Since the measurements were subjective, our results could be less reliable, as different people doing the same experiment could get different results
  • The assessments were done at slightly different times of the day for each location – this makes them less reliable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly