Paper 2- Research Methods Flashcards
Define an ‘aim’:
An Aim is a general statement of what the researcher intends to investigate, the purpose of the study
Define ‘Hypothesis’:
A hypothesis is a clear, precise, testable statement that states the relationship between the variables to be investigated. It is stated at the outset of every study.
Define ‘Directional Hypothesis’:
Direction Hypothesis:
States the direction of the difference or relationship, (one-tailed)(more or less?)
Define ‘Non-directional Hypothesis’:
Non-directional Hypothesis:
Does not state the direction of the difference or relationship (two-tailed)
(there will be a difference in people who drink coke to people who drink vodka)
What is an IV (independent variable)?
An IV is some aspect of experimental situation that is manipulated by researcher (or changes naturally).
The change of IV allows DV to be measured.
What is a DV (dependent variable)?
The DV is a variable that is being measured by researcher. An effect on the DV should be caused by change in IV.
When do you use a directional or non-directional hypothesis?
A directional hypothesis is used when a theory or findings of previous research suggest a particular outcome.
A non-directional hypothesis is used when there is no previous research or findings from earlier studies are contradictory.
What is an extraneous variable (EV)?
An EV is any variable other than IV that may affect the DV if it is not controlled.
What are confounding variables?
Confounding Variables are a kind of EV that vary systematically with IV. Therefore, we cannot tell if any change in DV is due to IV or confounding variable.
E.g. varying emotions with IV.
What are demand characteristics?
Demand characteristics are any cue from researcher or research situation that may be interpreted by PPs as revealing intentions of the study.
This may lead to change in PP behaviour within research situation.
What are Investigator Effects?
Investigator Effects are any effect of investigator’s behaviour (conscious or unconscious) on research outcome (DV). May include the design of study to selection of (and interaction with) PP during research process.
E.g. when expecting a certain result, investigator may stimulate certain response to favour their hypothesis
What is ‘randomisation’ in experiments?
Randomisation is the use of chance methods to control for effects of bias when designing materials and deciding the order of experimental conditions.
What is ‘standardisation’?
Standardisation is using exactly the same formalised procedures and instructions for all PPs in research study.
What is independent groups design?
PPs are allocated to different groups where each group represents one experimental condition.
1 group does condition A, drinking coke,
1 group does condition B, drinking vodka
What is repeated measures design?
All PPs take part in all conditions of expt.
Each PP would do condition A, drink coke, AND condition B, drink vodka.
What is matched pairs design?
Pairs of PPs are matched on some variable(s) that may affect the DV. Then 1 member of pair is assigned to condition A and the other is assigned to condition B.
Attempts to control confounding variable of participant variables (individual differences that may affect results)
What is random allocation?
An attempt to control for PP variables in independent group design which ensures the each PP has same chance of being in one condition as any other.
What is counterbalancing?
An attempt to control effects of order in repeated measures design. Half of PPs experience condition A first then condition B, and half PPs experience condition B first then condition A.
Evaluate Independent groups design:
- Negative: PP variables: individual differences between two groups in the two conditions. If there is a mean difference between the groups on DV, may be to do with PP variables rather than effects of IV (= confounding variable). Reduces validity of findings. How to deal? Use Random Allocation.
- Negative: More expensive than repeated measures as twice as many PPs needed to contribute the same number of results. Increasing time/money spent recruiting PPs.
- Positive: order effects not a problem (which is a problem for repeated measure design).
- PPs also less likely to guess aim of expt (less demand char.)
Evaluate Repeated Measures Design:
- Negative: each PP has to do at least 2 tasks and order of these tasks may be significant (order effects).
- Use of counterbalancing may help reduce order effects.
- Order effects may also arise due to boredom/fatigue, might cause deterioration in performance on second task. OR PP performance may improve in terms of practise (in skill-based task). Therefore, order is a confounding variable.
- More likely in repeated measures study that PP work out aim of study = demand characteristics.
- Strength?? PP variables are controlled (therefore higher validity) and fewer PPs needed (time+cost effective!!)
Evaluate Matched Pairs design:
- PPs only take part in single condition so order effects and demand characteristics are less of a problem
- Although there is some attempt to reduce PP variables, PPs can never be matched exactly (even identical twins!)
- Matching may be time-consuming and expensive (especially if pre-test required).
- Less economical than other designs.
What is a lab experiment?
A lab experiment takes place in a controlled environment where the researcher manipulates the IV and records the effect on DV, whilst maintaining strict control of EVs.
What is a field experiment?
A field experiment takes place in natural setting within which researcher manipulates IV and records effect on DV.
What is a natural experiment?
A natural experiment is where the change in IV is not brought about by researcher but would have happened even if researcher had not been there (e.g. PP was in car crash few months ago). Researcher records effect on DV. PPs may still be tested in a lab as only IV has to be natural, not necessarily the setting.
What is a quasi-experiment?
A quasi experiment is a study where the IV has not been determined by anyone, the variables simply exist (e.g. gender, race, height, weight, age). Strictly speaking it is not an experiment.
What is a strength and weakness of: Lab expt:
- Strength:
- high control over confounding variables and EVs.
- Researcher can be sure that any effect on DV is likely result of manipulation of IV.
- We can be more certain of cause and effect
- (high internal validity)
- Replication more possible than other expt types, due to high level of control. Replication is vital to check if findings are valid and not ‘one-off’.
- Weakness:
- lack generalisability- lab environment may be artificial and lack mundane realism
- In unfamiliar contexts, PPs may behave in unusual ways
- So their behaviour cannot be generalised beyond research setting (low external validity)
- Demand characteristics more prevalent: PPs aware that they are being tested in lab environment and may not behave naturally.
- The tasks may also lack mundane realism, not representative of everyday life - can results be generalised to normal life?
What is a strength and weakness of: Field expt:
- Strength:
- higher mundane realism than lab expt because environment is more natural.
- Field expt produce behaviour that is more valid and authentic.
- PPs may be unaware they are being studied (high external validity).
- Weakness
- loss of control of CVs and EVs; cause and effect between IV and DV more difficult to establish
- Precise replication of field expt is not possible
- Ethical issues: PPs unaware they are being studied, so cannot consent to being studied and so such research might constitute an invasion of privacy.
What is a strength and weakness of: Natural expt:
- Strength:
- Provide opportunities for research that are not undertaken for practical/ethical reasons, such as Romanian orphans by Rutter et al.
- They have high external validity because they involve study of real-world issues and problems as they happen.
- Weakness:
- Generalising findings difficult as there are reduced opportunities for research due to rare nature of naturally occurring event.
- PPs may not be randomly allocated to experimental conditions (only in independent group design).
- Therefore, cannot be certain that change in IV affects DV.
- If conducted in lab, then lack of mundane realism and demand char may be issue.
What is a strength and weakness of: quasi experiments:
- Strength: carried out in controlled conditions therefore share same strengths as lap expt (e.g replication, high internal validity)
- Weakness: cannot randomly allocate PPs to conditions and therefore may be confounding variables.
- Also, IV is not deliberately changed by researcher and therefore cannot claim that IV caused observed change.
What is random sampling?
All members of target population have equal chance of being selected. First obtain complete list of all members of target population. Assign a number to all names in list. Actual sample is selected through use of some lottery method (randomiser/picking from hat)
What is systematic sampling?
- A systematic sample is every nth member of target population is selected, e.g. every 3rd person.
- Sampling frame is produced, which is a list of people in target population into eg. alphabetical order.
- Sampling system nominated, e.g. every 3rd person or 6th or 5th
- May begin from randomly determined point to reduce bias
What is Stratified sampling?
- composition of sample reflects proportions of people in certain subgroups (strata) within target population or wider population.
- Researcher first identifies different strata that make up population.
- Then proportions needed for representative sample worker out
- Then PPs that make up each stratum selected using random sampling.
What is opportunity sampling?
- Researchers select anyone who happens to be willing and available.
- Researcher takes chance to ask whoever is around at time of study.
What is volunteer sampling?
- Involves PPs selecting themselves to be part of sample (self-selection)
- May place advert in newspaper or in online ad
- OR willing PPs may simply raise their hand when researcher asks.
Evaluate random sampling:
- potentially unbiased, so CV or EV should be equally divided between different groups, enhances internal validity.
- Difficult and time consuming to conduct. Complete list of target population hard to obtain.
- Sample may still be unrepresentative; could be that unrepresentative population is still selected by accident.
- Selected PPs may refuse to take part (becomes more of a volunteer sample)
Evaluate Systematic sampling:
- Sample method is objective.
- Once system for selection is established researcher has no influence over who is chosen
- method is time consuming, and PPs may refuse to take part.
Evaluate stratified sampling:
- produces representative population because it is designed to accurately reflect the composition of population
- Means that generalisation of findings becomes possible
- The identified strata cannot reflect all the ways people are different, so complete representation of whole population not possible.
- VERY time consuming and may be costly
Evaluate opportunity sampling:
- Convenient and cost effective and time effective.
- no need for list of members in target population or to divide population into different strata.
- BUT!! there are 2 forms of bias:
- sample is unrepresentative of target population as it is drawn from specific area, so findings cannot be generalised to target population.
- Also, researcher has complete control over selection of PPs, so may avoid people they do not like (researcher bias)
Evaluate Volunteer sampling:
- easy and requires minimal effort/input from researcher, less time consuming
- Researcher has PPs who are more engaged.
- Volunteer bias is a problem. Asking for volunteers may attract certain ‘profile’ of person, may want to please researcher, so can findings be generalised?
- e.g. college students may opt for research studies as it is easy way to make money. Sample = unrepresentative.
Why is deception an issue and how can it be dealt with?
- Deliberately misleading or withholding info from PPs at any stage of investigation.
- PPs have not received enough info when they gave consent to take part (or have been lied to) cannot be justified as informed consent.
- Can be justified if it doesn’t cause PP distress.
- Give a debrief, make PP aware of aims and details of investigation.
What is the BPS code of ethics?
- A quasi-legal document produced by British Psychological Society (BPS) that instructs psychologists in UK about what behaviour is and is not acceptable when dealing with PPs. The code is built around 4 major principles:
- Respect
- Competence
- Responsibility
- Integrity
What is Informed Consent and how does it prevent unethical practise?
- Prospective PPs should know what they are getting into
- Informed Consent = making PPs aware of the aims of research, procedures, rights (right to withdraw) and how their data will be used.
- PPs should make informed judgement whether or not to take part without being coerced or feeling obliged.
- From researcher’s p.o.v. asking for informed consent may make study meaningless because PP behaviour may not be as ‘natural’ as PPs are now aware of aims of study.
What is Protection from Harm and how does it prevent unethical practise?
- As a result of their involvement, PPs should not be placed at any more risk than they would be in normal life
- PPs should be protected from physical and psychological harm.
- Includes being made to feel embarrassed, inadequate, stress, pressure, mental torment, pain.
- PPs should also be reminded that they have the right to withdraw from investigation.
What is Privacy and Confidentiality and how does it prevent unethical practise?
- PPs have the right to control info about themselves
- This is the right to privacy
- If this is invaded then confidentiality should be protected
- Confidentiality is a part of the Data Protection Act
How would a researcher deal with informed consent?
- Consent letter
- details all relevant info that might affect their decision to participate.
- It must be signed for their consent to be given.
- for PPs under 16, a parental consent required.
- 3 types of consent:
- Presumptive consent - PPs themselves not asked, but a similar group. If they agree, then PP consent is presumed.
- Prior general consent - PP give permission to take part in multiple studies, including ones that involve deception. By consenting, they are consenting to deception.
- Retrospective consent - PP ask for consent (during debriefing), having already taken part in study.
How do researcher deal with deception and protection from harm?
- Given full debrief
- Made aware of true aims and details of expt
- Told how their data will be used and be allowed the right to withhold data.
- PPs should be reassured that their behaviour was typical/normal.
- If required, due to distress, give PPs counselling.
How do researchers deal with confidentiality?
- If personal details are held, they must be protected.
- Maintain anonymity
What is a pilot study and what are its aims?
- small scale run of actual investigation
- only handful of PPs
- tests procedure and checks if investigation runs smoothly
- includes questionnaires and interviews
- helps remove errors and introduce better measures, e.g. removing bad/ambiguous question form questionnaire.
- In observational studies, pilot studies used to train observers.
- Helps identify problems and modify design of study to save money and time in long run.
What is a ‘single-blind procedure’?
- Aims of study and details kept secret from PPs, until after study.
- Any info that might create expectations is not revealed until the end of the study to control for confounding effects of demand characteristics.
What is a ‘double-blind procedure’?
- Neither PPs nor researcher aware of aims of investigation (third party conducting investigation)
- Often used in drug trials
- Prevents influencing PPs behaviour.