paper 2 essay plans Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

rosenhan AO1

A
  • ppts - 8, 12, 5/3, 5
  • hollow, empty, thud, then stopped signs of SZ
  • charged with SZ in remission
  • normal behaviour seen as “obsessive”
  • follow up 41, 23, 19
  • 35/118 patients, 7-52, avg 19
  • sticky
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

rosenhan results

A
  • 7-52 day stays, mean 19
  • 35/118 knew pseudos were fake ‘you’re not crazy - you’re a journalist’
  • normal behaviour interpreted as nervous e.g. ‘obsessive note taking’
  • pt 2 - 43 by 1 staff member, 23 by a psychiatrist, 19 by a psychiatrist & other staff member
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

rosenhan AO3

A
  • diff hospitals but only rep of 70s
  • qual and quant, subjective data journals
  • pressure on accuracy, not worldwide app
  • eco validity, ppl refused into wards
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

ICD/DSM AO1

A
  • ICD, coded into sections - F, F20 SZ,
  • moniters incidence, prevalence, mortality, morbidity
  • available in cultural forms, features and symptoms needed to diagnose disorder
  • DSM 5 - 3 sections; how to use, diagnosis, standardised tests and GAF scale
  • removed unneccessary disorders - 5-> 1 autism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

DSM AO3

A

Validity:
- Lahey - good predictive validity for ADHD over 3 years
- BUT Sanchez - 74% of depressed people recieved the correct diagnosis 26% wrongly diagnosed with depression - internal valid shite

Reliability:
- Rosenhan - 7/8 were correctly diagnosed with SZ when presenting same symptoms - inter-rater
- Beck - same symptoms diagnosed as same disorder ab 50% of the time - low inter-rater

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ICD AO3

A

Validity:
- mason et al predictive validity 13y later but
- Valle et al found the validity to be uncertain

Reliability:
- Ponizovsky 94.2% mood disorder agreement, 83% psychotic - intra-rater reliable
- BUT Nicholls 0.36 rel score <DSM &GOS hospital criteria

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Types of reliability and validity

A
  • intra-rater
  • interrater
  • aetiological - cause of disorder
  • internal - symptoms/disorder match
  • construct - operationalised disorder
  • predictive - treatments good?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

name 4 symptoms and 3 features of SZ

A
  1. affects 1% population
  2. peak onset mid 20sM, late 20sF
  3. men more likely to develop negative symptoms
    * hallucinations
    * delusions
    * thought insertions
    * disorganised speech/thought
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

difference between pos and neg symptoms of SZ

A
  • pos = adds something e.g. hallucinations
  • neg = takes something away e.g. anhedonia (diminishes ability to experience pleasure)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

dopamine hypothesis AO1

A
  • hyperdopaminergia causes SZ symptoms
  • ↑ dop in mesolimbic causes positive symptoms
  • more/more sensitive D2 receptors
  • beta hydroxylase low levels
  • hypOdopaminergia in PFC
  • ↓ dop in mesoCORTICAL causes neg symptoms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

dopamine hypothesis AO3

A
  • donnewee homovanillic BUT SZ could cause dop ↑ - C and E
  • lindstroem LDOPA BUT could be a combo of genes and NTs
  • backed by drug therapies however diathesis stress might be better
  • Falsifiable therefore scientific however reductionist so issue with validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Genetic explanation of SZ AO1

A
  • heritable factor of SZ
  • 8-16% higher risk for first degree relatives, 17% if DZ twin, higher for MZ
  • chromosome 22, 1, 15
  • 22q11 deletion linked to delusions and psychotic symptoms
  • COMT gene produces an enzyme maintaining dopamine/ serotonin levels - found in dodgy chromosome 22
  • adoption studies can separate nature and nurture
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Genetic explanation of SZ AO3 - hasnt come up

A
  • gottesman meta 41 studies, 17% DZ concordance, 48% MZ, BUT not 100% therefore not a full explanation
  • International SZ consortium - abnormalities in chrom22,1,15 BUT could be due to dysfunctional negative family communication and the stress
  • genes sensitise the brain to dopamine so could be both however focusing only on biological aspects is reductionist
  • alternative theory - diathesis stress model more holistic, however application to screening and early intervention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

cognitive explanation of SZ AO1

A
  • SZ = dysfunctional attention system
  • preconscious filtering - delusions, paranoia, disorganised thought/speech
  • perception and memory - schemas are not activated in new situations; disorganised speech - cant figure out what will happen next
  • ## self-monitering - cant tell whats internal/external - hallucinations and paranoia,
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Cog explanation of SZ AO3

A
  • Interactionist - more hol, but hard to establish cause and effect
  • Mcguire - temp lobe less active in hals, unable to control inner voice, Butler et al found less activity in frontal lobes, dont pay attention to surroundings
  • can be used by CBT to treat SZ however less effective for neg symptoms which may be better explained via the dop hyp
  • dickson et al found adolescents had same cog defects but Sitskoorn found relatives same defects no SZ
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

drug therapy SZ AO1

A
  • ECT/psychosurgery used but controversial
  • tablet / syrup / injection
  • typical/atypical
  • reduce levels of dopamine in brain by binding to D2 receptors, depolarises neuron
  • atypical bind temporarily to D2
  • typical binds permanently
  • atypical block serotonin
  • bind within 48h, takes 10-14 days to improve
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Drug treatment SZ AO3

A
  • Pickar et al - clozapine>neuroleptics and placebos, BUT some are treatment resistent - 25%
  • Elmsley risperidone - 84% ppts at least 50% reduction BUT might be due to early part of disorder
  • schooler et al - less severe side effects and lower relapse 42% rather than 55% BUT side effects
  • better to keep in society, cheaper, cant cure the disorder, only manages symptoms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

psychoanalysis AO1

A
  • dream association - dream diary kept and analysed for manifest content and latent content - sub messages
  • free recall - write down every thought
  • freudian slips - make a verbal mistake that reflects an unconscious thought/ attitude
  • challenges view of parental relationship
  • deal with repressed material, reconstructs ego defence mechanism to be healthier
  • regression into childhood and roleplay with the therapist as the parent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

psychoanalysis AO3

A
  • malmberg et al - those who did psychotherapy couldnt be released from hospital, drugs can BUT less relapse and needed less further treatment
  • Bargenquast - person underwent 2 years of psychoanalysis, reduced symptoms BUT ungeneralisable to TP
  • Long waiting lists for treatment, accessibility issue BUT non-invasive treatment eg if dont like idea of chemically altering yourself
  • roth and fonagy those in acute stages less able to cope with treatment - emotionally invasive BUT no side effects physically
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Carlsson AO1

A
  • looked at research on dop hyp
  • 32 studies used between 1979 and 1999
  • used animals, brain scans, SZs, remission patients, post-mortem studies and PCP use
  • results - 3 stages - dopamine, glutamate, drug treatments
  • PET scans support dopamine - more dop in basal ganglia
  • hypoglutamatergia causes psychotic symptoms
  • clozapine might be effective for treatment resistent SZs because blocks serotonin not just dope
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

carlsson AO3

A
  • generalisable - 32 pieces of reserach broad range
  • however research is 20 years old therefroe may be a generational thing might not be relevant today
  • PET scans are scientific, objective and easily comparible - reliable
  • secondary data standardised procedure issues may be missed - not own research
  • types of SZ variations looked at not just one type - valid
  • animal research - may have same brain structure but not same cognitive function so ungeneralisable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

name 3 symptoms and 3 features of depression

A
  • prevalence - 3.5 mill in UK
  • Gender - twice as common in women - 1/4 women
  • age of onset - mid 20s, most common between 25-44
  • symptoms include - depressed mood, loss of pleasure, fatiguability
  • needs to be shown for at least 2 weeks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Monoamine hypothesis AO1

A
  • monoamines - serotonin, dopamine, noradrenaline lower levels in D ppl
  • serotonin regulates other NTs
  • sero associated with sleep and anxiety - causes insomnia
  • dopamine associated with reward - causes lack of motivation
  • noradrenaline keeps alertness and focus, a lack causes lethargy and lack of focus
  • 2 ways a lack is caused:
  • pump-like mechanism uptakes NTs too quick
  • too much monoamine oxidase enzymes break down too many NTs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Monoamine hypothesis AO3

A
  • anti depressants do work - Geddes - therefore it shows a bio exp is also credible BUT many30% may not respond well to anti-depressants
  • Wender and Klein found rats given low levels of nora made them inactive and sluggish BUT RATS
  • Bell found low levels of tryptophan creating sero caused D BUT cause and effect
  • scientific - empirical, falsifiable - reductionist bad
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

cognitive explanation of UD AO1

A
  • Cognitive triad - neg thoughts about self, world, future
  • cognitive errors eg catastrophising, crystal ball, labelling
  • cog errors lead to selective attention to the neg
  • schemata - core beliefs shaped by early childhood, more negative / traumatic experiences = more negative views on the world
  • depressed schemata - affective schema causing sadness, motivational schema leading to lack of motivation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Non-biological explanation UD AO3

A
  • koster et al 15 depressed teens focused on loser longer in selective attention task BUT yovel and Mineka couldnt find a relationship between UD and selective attention
  • moilanen found D teens associated with dysfunctional attitudes and future attitudes - neg triad - BUT macintosh and fisher said too complex, just need neg thoughts of self
  • Children of the 90s study dad left caused depression by trauma so schema good BUT genetic dispositions or hormonal imbalances
  • evidence based theory - empirical research BUT hard to prove neg thoughts cause depression
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

biological treatment for UD AO1

A
  • pump-like mech, monoamine oxidase too much
  • more popular bc less controversial than ECT
  • increase serotonin and noradrenaline by stopping these processes ^
  • SSRIs work by inhibiting reuptake of serotonin
  • tricyclics block the reuptake of both sero and nora
  • MAOIs inhibit the enzymes that break down the monoamines
  • people often react differently so may affect which drug is used to treat
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

biological treatment for depression AO3

A
  • Coppen found SSRIs useful but Kuyken found CBT to be better
  • WHO stated its a well documented treatment for severe depression over loads of studies BUT piggott found publication bias is common with drug treatments because theyre easier
  • quicker and cheaper than therapy - can feel better in 2 weeks BUT not a cure
  • Geddes found it effective - 18% relapse, 42% placebo and treatment lasted 3 years BUT side effects like suicide ideation, nausea and insomnia can cause people to come off and relapse - not good if they cant complete treatment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

psychological treatment for UD AO1

A
  • CBT - UD due to maladaptive thought processes
  • explores sig life events
  • provides the therapist with a frame of reference
  • therapist listens to core beliefs, tecahing how to recognise and provide adaptive solutions
  • downward arrow technique - question statements until core belief is revealed eg soup bad → failure
  • smart targets - specific, measurable, achieveable, relevant and time-bound - reviewed weekly
  • therapist helps break cycle by reality testing, encouraging asking questions
  • keep a thought diary that can be worked through
  • work on ways to banish neg thoughts eg distractions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

psychological treatment for UD AO3

A
  • kuyken found CBT more effective for symptoms and relapse than drug therapies BUT Jarrett found MAOIs and CBT equally effective
  • NICE recommends CBT BUT Chan found CBT more effective WITH drugs
  • CBT may be preferred sue to no side effects BUT it still may be emotionally invasive and exhausting and requires a desire for change which D ppl will struggle with
  • CBT treats the core problem rather than just relieving the symptoms however witing lists may be very long and may take ages to get the treatment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Williams et al AO1

A
  • is CBMI effective? with I-CBT? does it ease the difficulty of I-CBT?
  • 232 ppts originally, but due to exclusion criteria eg if PHQ score under 19, no minors, or suicidal history ended up with 69 ppts in trial or control group
  • 77% women in trial group
  • 20 mins a day for 7 days of CBMI, then trial group did ICBT for 10 weeks with 6 online lessons, given extra homework and resources
  • Results - sig reductions in all prim measures
  • PHQ- 7.23 vs WLC 3.26
  • BDI-II - 17.52 vs WLC 7.46
  • K10 - 11.86 vs WLC 4.17
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Williams et al results

A
  • 65% clin sig
  • all prim measures clin sig diffs
  • PHQ - 7.23 vs 3.26
  • BDI-II - 17.52 vs 7.46
    K10 - 11.86 vs 4.17
33
Q

williams AO3

A
  • exclusion criteria makes it less representative but better internal validity as less factors to consider eg drug dependence or how suicidal they are
  • recognised questionnaires used so valid and reliable BUT self-report data demand characteristics
  • drop out rate reduces validity as there is bias in the results as we dont get results for what didnt work BUT application - ICBT works so should recieve more funding
  • ethics - approved by 2 research ethics committees in sydney BUT cant see which treatment had the effect
34
Q

individual differences in clinical psychology: AO1

A
  • Culture - black british ppl are 6 x more likely to have SZ than other british people, UD affects between 2-19% people, dependent on country
  • culture-bound syndrome eg shenkui - anxiety, insomnia, fatigue, sex dysf. would be classed as psychosis or anxiety in UK
  • gender - UD twice as common in women, SZ age of onset is different, men more neg symptoms, women more pos and disorganised SZ
  • developmental differences - junk food, TV and sleep deprivation causes teenage depression , excess anxiety over exams, social pressure due to social media or cyberbullying causes increase in depressed teens
35
Q

Individual differences in clinical AO3

A
  • CULTURE - Bhugra found differences between caucs and asians in SZ symptoms - asians more neg, white people more hallucinations BUT littlewood and lipsedge said MH workers more likely to diagnose black people with SZ with MH conditions ∴ just racism
  • CULTURE BOUND - Inuit tribes similar names for psych conditions ∴ not culture difference, just different name same thing BUT very eurocentric view to believe all disorders are forms of western disorders might be culture specific
  • GENDER - Kaplan found SZ onset M = 15-25 but F = 25-35 and another peak between 40s and 60s BUT Maybe women just talk about it more than men rather than actual difference
  • DEVELOPMENT - Children of the 90s - dad left, more depression so development affect UD, freudian view of depression - could be gen predisp.
36
Q

Clinical key question:

A

are drug treatments for UD and SZ an effective use of NHS money?

37
Q

Clinical key question why its relevant:

A
  • 202 mill spent on ADs in 2019
  • 128 mill for antiSZ
  • cost NHS money if they relapse so treatment must be effective
  • are side effects worth it for treatment?
  • keeps people in work
  • need to make informed decisions so need to know most effective treatments
38
Q

Structure of clinical key question

A
  • facts
  • why relevant
  • how drugs work
  • weakness of DTs
  • Alt theory better than DTs
  • Alt theory worse than DTs bc…
  • first choice drugs are great bc…
39
Q

brain damage AO1

A
  • trauma often affects frontal lobes - control impulses
  • amygdala regulates emotion and how we process stimuli
  • amygdala makes people not fear consequences
  • frontal lobe controls social and sexual behaviour, reduces our empathy, unable to come up with alt solutions, unable to learn from past
  • PFC rules judgements - less likely to know right from wrong, less impulse control
40
Q

Brain damage AO3

A
  • Williams et al found 120/200 prisoners had a childhood brian trauma - backs up PFC - BUT only 60% so incomplete explanation
  • matthies et al 20 volunteers - 16-18% reduction BUT reductionist approach - Eyesenck could be better
  • scientific - easily empirical, falsifiable - BUT brain damage could affect many regions and cant unpick those influences so cant pinpoint
41
Q

Amygdala causes ASB AO1

A
  • how we process stimuli
  • overrides thinking part of brain unable to find alt solutions
  • damage causes over-aggression bc processing situation wrong
  • amygdala controls emotions eg anger
  • also makes people less fearful of consequences
42
Q

Amygdala AO3

A
  • matthies et al 20 volunteers 16-18% reduction BUT reductionist theory
  • Groves et al removed the amygdala of aggressive ppl to reduce aggro but also motivation and emotions so responsible but hard to pinpoint aggro because damage could affect other places
  • Zagrodska studied amygdala damage with cats, induces pred aggro BUT pred aggro is not the same as rage aggro in humans
43
Q

XYY AO1

A
  • 23 pairs normal, 1/1000 have an extra
  • characteristics - 7cm taller avg, 10-15 points lower IQ than siblings, wider spaced eyes
  • may have learning difficulties or behavioural problems eg impulsivity
  • easily distracted and more active than others
  • may be a self fulfilling prophecy
44
Q

XYY AO3

A
  • theilgaard - more aggro content, less non-aggro content in TAT test BUT more violent stories does not make the individual more violent
  • If XYY diagnosed in childhood, intervention can be put in place BUT very reductionist, may be better to use Eyesenck’s theory
  • Epps found more XYY men in prison proportionately more ASB BUT not specifically for violent crime so goes against the more violent idea
  • Howitt found XYY men more common in offenders than general population BUT Stocholm et al said when socioeconomic conditions considered, XYY men similar to other men
45
Q

Eyesenck AO1

A
  • interaction between gen predisps and growing up around crime
  • PEN - psychoticism, extraversion, neuroticism
  • Extraversion - social, dominant, impulsive. Underaroused RAS so must seek external stimulation e.g. joy riding
  • Neuroticism - anxious, tense, unstable, speedy - sympathetic system, paresseux parasympathetic system so on edge all the time, hard to inhibit behaviour in fight or flight
  • psychoticism - hostile, unempathetic, careless, linked to high testosterone, hardcore offenders thought to be psycho bc normal people would care
  • Neurotic and extraverted ppl have a harder nervous system to condition - don’t get the anxiety-ASB link
46
Q

Eyesenck AO3

A
  • Gran et al - 48% psycho ex offenders more likely to reoffend - psychos more likely to become hardcore criminals BUT incomplete because not even 50%
  • Rushton and Christjohn checked PEN scores with delinquency rates of students - higher PEN higher criminality BUT self report data - higher chance of demand characteristics
  • interactionist approach more holistic - SLT might be better as it explains the motivation behind criminality rather than the type of person
47
Q

difference between labelling and SFP

A

labelling comes AFTER an action, SFP comes BEFORE an action

48
Q

labelling theory AO1

A
  • deviant behaviour decided by society
  • based on interaction between deviant and non-deviant ppl in a situation - doctor vs druggy using heroin
  • anti-social behaviour changes over time
  • after labelling person becomes stigmatised e.g. ex-convicts, treatment, self concept changes, SFP takes place but dont say the word self-fulfilling prophecy
  • retrospective labelling - school shooters and projective labelling eg someone killing a cat = jeffrey dahmer
  • prim/sec deviance - first deviant behaviour and following behaviour
49
Q

Labelling AO3

A
  • Schwartz and skolnick if legally accused, harder to find a future employment, people treat you different BUT lemerts study found cheque forgers forged for way longer before they were labelled as such so doesnt explain the primary deviance
  • application to countries like the netherlands BUT some people may not react to labels
  • better than others as describes how people are labelled BUT cant explain why people start becoming criminals so alt theory SFP may be better because label comes first
50
Q

SFP AO1

A
  • give people labels based on stereotypes of the group they identify with
  • label comes before behaviour
  • after labelling we expect them to behave in a certain way that fits our perception
  • modify behaviour to the labellee and then; react, internalise, self concept, imitate label
  • people around them only pay attention to behaviour that fits the label, ignores behaviour that opposes it
  • this reinforces the label
51
Q

SFP AO3

A
  • lamb and crano - teens who dont smoke weed were 4.4 times more likely to if aprents called them a stoner BUT lee and blumenthal found babyfaced boys more likely to be delinquent - stereotype of harmlessness didnt label them
  • better than alt theory because can explain why people are criminals - primary deviance unlike labelling theory BUT ignores gen predisps, eyesenck takes into account both environment and bio basis
  • rosenthal and jacobson - academic bloomers performed far better than others affects academic perf BUT reaction to labels is individual and maybe not
52
Q

SLT AO1

A
  • attention, retention, reproduction, motivation
  • intrinsic/ extrinsic - getting a rush/ for money
  • vicarious reinforcement - model reinforced, commit behaviour
  • model - based on relevance and status
53
Q

SLT AO3

A
  • bandura found that preschool children imitated aggressive behaviour HOWEVER preschool - adults and crime may be different
  • williams british columbia - TV gives children aggro role models to copy - kids 2x as aggro BUT might have been the increase in value of material posessions rather than the violent TV
  • Unscientific because it is unfalsifiable - qualifies any opposing statements eg well thats not the role model, better theory can be labelling theory or genetic predisposition theories BUT it can be applied to make sure criminals are punished because it acts as a deterrent
54
Q

cognitive interviews AO1

A
  • improves event recall by reducing the use of schemas
  • 4 techniques
  • report everything - may cue retrieval of “irrelevant info”
  • reinstate context - environmental and state cues
  • change recall order - from middle or reversed
  • change perspective - from the view of other people
  • interviewers must be silent in free recall, attentive and non-verbal gestures, must be able to build rapport quickly
55
Q

Cognitive interviews AO3

A
  • cog interviews are recorded as well as having notes so good validity as no info is lost BUT if info needs to be gained quickly it isnt as effective so direct questioning may be quicker in those cases
  • Memon et al found that cog ints led to higher amounts of correct info being recalled when asking students about a video of a shooting BUT not valid because emotions were not present which could cause them to forget eg Yerkes Dodson law
  • Wysman et al found that repeated questioning had no effect on ppt accuracy during a cog interview therefore not being reconstructed BUT if neg feedback given ppts changed their answers the most in the cog interview - neg feedback and repeated Qs can lead to reconstruction
56
Q

Ethical interviews AO1

A
  • PEACE model
  • Planning and preparation - key objectives and roles assigned, timing, topicm equipment, evidence, interpreter? extra adult in the room?
  • Engage and explain - establish rapport, make ppt feel safe, less anxious etc, engage non-verbally, need to explain procedure and objectives
  • Account - give open prompts, clarify after free recall, do not interrupt free recall, simple language used, open followed by closed questions, avoid leading questions, challenges left to the end of the account if there are inconsistencies
  • Closure - ends at a planned time, any questions ppt has should be answered, summary should be said for the record and ppt, any extra support should be recommended now
  • Evaluation - evaluate evidence and assess performance and adherence to ethical conduct of the interviewer, make sure multiple sources of data are being used eg DNA, alibis, CCTV footage
57
Q

PEACE interviews AO3

A
  • Mcgurk carr and mcgurk - interviewing knowledge and skills improved after PEACE training for 6 months BUT cannot predict efficacy in a year/2
  • Kebbell found that ethical training were the best methods for extracting information out of sex offenders BUT it was self-report data and an opinion from a criminal, better to use empirical evidence rather than just opinions of pedos
  • 2010 70% police in the UK trained in peace training and 49% invested in supervision for police officers, therefore clearly useful otherwise wouldnt bother BUT Milne found basic skills were rated low by officers and only diff between trained and untrained was trained conducted longer interviews than untrained
58
Q

formulations AO1

A
  • hypothesis as to why the person became a criminal
  • briedf - why it started, why its maintained, whyit will carry on
  • often used in court cases
  • use lots of psych theories and research and look into the ppt’s history and relationships to recommend the best treatment
  • individualised, consistent with common theories, based on evidence, concise, reliable and gives measurable predictions
  • works with offender to provide goals they want to achieve to stop recidivism
  • useful in 4 situations - ppt has complex problems, unknown criminal behaviour eg cyber grooming, treatments havent worked previously, offender isnt motivated to change
59
Q

formulations AO3

A
  • Whitehead et al found that case forms were good bc they included important goals to Mr C BUT hard to come up with a treatment if the info is contradictory or complex
  • helps the perp understand their own behaviour and triggers, allowing them to avoid them in future BUT success relies on perp giving up enough info which they may not be willing to do
  • takes into account all aspects of the clients life so more holistic than other profiling techniques eg interviews BUT its costly and lengthy to get everyone trained eg psychs, officers, probation services and support networks
60
Q

AMPs ASB AO1

A
  • Anger management programs (AMPs)
  • small groups, 10 sessions, 50-60 mins, trained AM therapist
  • Based on cog behav princs - look at thought patterns and how it affects behaviour
  • cog prep- perps identify triggers, therapist challenges thoughts, ask ab conseqs, retrain thought processes
  • skill aquisition- learn new coping mechs, deep breathing, walking away, calm physiological signs of anger eg racing heart, assertiveness training to help them listen/ communicate
  • application practise- roleplaying diff triggers and practising skills, controlled environment so safe
  • may use prompt cards to express feelings as perps often below avg education
61
Q

AMPs ASB AO3

A
  • blacker et al found a drama-based programme ab masc, power & control as well as AMPs helped reduce anger BUT small, gender biased sample so cant be said if women would react the same way
  • Howells et al found that anger knowledge improved and the imp lasted, so effective BUT all other parts didnt improve for long eg control and cognition lasted 2 months so not rlly
  • henwood et al meta-analysis - 23% reduction in general recidivism and 28% reduction in violent recid BUT AMPs rely on the motive of crimes being revenge or anger- not always the case eg other intrinsic/ extrinsic motivation

anger management

62
Q

Howells ASB AO1

A
  • 418 ppts australia - 86% violent crime;30% V&GBH, 8% GBH, 6% inj causing death
  • 285 men completed the post int, 78 2 months, 21 6 months, 73% no prior experience with AMPs - control group from WL
  • tested self report 4 times - before, after, 2 and 6 months, WLC twice before and after with 6 questionnaires including:
  • STAXI - How the offender’s anger is expressed - Xpression
  • WAKS - Understanding of how to deal with their anger eg whacking things
  • STRS - Treatment readiness - only one with an R in it
  • completed a checklist at end of each session to pinpoint what covered
  • treatment 10 sessions 2 hours long
  • results - anger knowledge sig inc - 1.8 vs 0.95, as well as slight improvement in expressions and control 1.5 vs 0.5
  • 2 months - control,cognition, arousal, and expression lasted not 6
  • 6 months - anger knowledge

Howells et al

63
Q

what did Howells questionnaires measure and names

3 examples:

A
  • STAXI - How the offender’s anger is expressed - Xpression
  • WAKS - Understanding of how to deal with their anger eg whacking things
  • STRS - Treatment readiness - only one with an R in it
64
Q

what did the AMP treatment in Howells consist of?

A
  • how to identify provocation
  • relaxation techniques
  • cognitive restructuring
  • assertion techniques and how to express emotion appropriately
  • relapse prevention techniques
65
Q

important numbers in howells et al:

A
  • 418, 285, 78, 21, 73%
  • 86%, 30%, 8%, 6%
  • 1.5, 0.5, 1.8, 0.95
66
Q

Howells AO3

A
  • androcentric but better comparison to Maletzky
  • standardised programme replicable BUT self report data - may believe they can control it better than they actually can - better to use interviews
  • high validity because quant and qual from 6 questionnaires can be triangulated BUT validity can be questioned because was in a correctional centre in Aus so demand characteristics
67
Q

Drug treatment ASB AO1

A
  • drug therapy
  • dopamine antagonists - high dopamine = high aggro
  • dopamine agonists bind to recetors to reduce dopamine uptake
  • SSRI’s influence our sexual behaviour - reduces libido when sero is high so allows sufficient uptake
  • anti-androgens- too much testosterone causes ASB and sexually deviant behaviour - CPA/MPA common treatments
  • MPA blocks and breaks down testosterone in pituitary gland
  • Intramuscular injection of 300-400mg every 7-10 days
  • Side affects: osteoporosis and depression
68
Q

Drug treatment ASB AO3

A
  • Thibaut et al found MPA to be effective on 11 male sex offenders when combined with psychotherapy BUT side effects of MPA can be rough eg growing boobs, depression and osteoporosis
  • Maletzky found drug treatments effective BUT can be unethical if they are forced on offenders as a requirement for their release
  • Meyers et al found 18% recidivisim on MPA vs 55% who were untreated BUT doesnt address root cause - cant explain why the perp offended so cant avoid future triggers for this
69
Q

Maletzky ASB AO1

A
  • 275 oregano men between 200-2004
  • criteria inc - past or current convictions for SO, went to jail twice, excess sex drive
  • 134 not recommended MPA, 141 didnt need it, 55 couldnt access it, 79 on MPA
  • mention how MPA works
  • MPA injections every 2 weeks, dosage/ timing was not strict but between 200-400mg every other week
  • questionnaires completed by staff and ppts ab new offences, rearrests etc
  • Results - MPA committed fewer new offences 4 vs 17, no reoffending on MPA, 11 on WLC, 70 “doing well” vs 24 non-MPA, employed/keeping job 59 MPA vs 41WLC

SO = sexual offence

70
Q

Maletzky ASB AO3

A
  • not androcentic, large sample
  • exact dosages and timings missed so no stand proc.
  • Holistic questionnaire - looks at more than just recidivism eg how theyre doing, employment etc BUT self-report unlikely to say theyve been committing new crimes - demand chars
  • subjective opinion of how officers think theyre doing BUT good application to what we should be investing in since its effective
71
Q

criminal key question:

A

Are eyewitness testimonies reliable?

72
Q

issue for society

criminal key question:

A
  • relied on more than forensic evidence
  • in 1990 239 convictions overturned - 79% due to EWT
  • 18,000 open prison pp py
  • 40,000 high sec prison
  • Robert Cotton convicted rapist found to be innocent
73
Q

Links back to the KQ

criminal - EWTs reliable?

A
  • perp goes free committing crimes
  • costs the state more to investigate
  • trauma for the family
  • social cost for fake perp
74
Q

Key question AO3

criminal EWT

A
  • leading questions - loftus and palmer BUT Yuille and Cutshall real shooting leading questions had no effect
  • Weapon focus - Steblay(stabby) reviewed 19 studies found that weapon = worse recall in lineup BUT pickle
  • Recon memory - Bartlett but Wynn and Logie
  • cog interviews - improve EWT BUT milne found basic skills poor
75
Q

Factors affecting EWT AO1

A
  • post event info - talking to others and confirming schemas, news/media outlets giving info,
  • leading questions, implanted memories by therapist
  • weapon focus - limited mental capacity and we focus on weapon, Yerkes dodson law - arousal performance↑ but then ↓
76
Q

Factors affecting EWT AO3

A
  • post event info - bartlett war of the ghosts but justr weird/ wynn and Logie
  • Leading questions - Loftus and palmer BUT Yuille and cutshall said no recall accurate
  • weapon focus - (STABBY) Steblay weapon = lower recall in 19 studies BUT Pickel said unusualness of weapon
77
Q

Loftus and Palmer AO1

A
  • understand effect of use of verbs on the percieved speed of a car
  • 45 american students, opportunity sample and 5 conditions - smashed, collided, bumped, hit, contacted
  • they watched 5s-30s films of accidents from evergreen safety council in a randomised order
  • given a questionnaire about the film and what happened in them with the question “what speed was the car travelling when they________ each other” switched out verb dependent on condition
  • Smash - 40.5, hit - 34.0, contacted 31.8 mph
  • verbs affect perception of speed, EWT and leading questions
  • follow up to check why people estimated different speeds
  • was it response bias (not different recall, just changed due to wording) or did the verb change the perception of the actual event
  • another film shown, 50, 50, 50 split into smashed, hit and not asked about speed
  • came back a week later asked if they saw glass - more ppl saw glass if smashed - 16, only 7 saw glass with hit, but 121/150 said no glass so recall due to response bias
78
Q

Loftus and Palmer AO3

A
  • students - may not be representative of other age groups, may pay more attention
  • standardised procedure - all 7 clips same, same questionnaire
  • lacks validity because not emotionally affected so recall might be different BUT more ethical than watching the clip
  • application to the Devlin report which states you cant convict someone only on one EWT BUT lacks validity because if they dont recall it correctly there are no real consequences whereas IRL it could cause the wrong person to go to jail and Yuille and Cutshall refute the findings
79
Q

factors affecting jury decision-making AO1

characteristics

A
  • race - white people have a negative view of anyone non-white,
  • jurors the same race are less likely to find the defendent guilty
  • ingroup-outgroup bias - SIT
  • Attractiveness - more attractive, less likely to be found guilty, schema that criminals are not pretty because pretty people r nice
  • Accent - more likely to be found guilty if they have an unpopular accent eg birmingham or scouse or if they have an accent not from where the juror