PAPER 1 DIMINISHED RESPONSIBLITY Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is Diminished Responsibility?

A

A partial defence available on a charge of murder that leads to conviction for manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where are its elements stated?

A

in S.2 Homicide Act 1957 (amended by S.52 Coroners and Justice Act 2009)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the first element?

A

D must suffer from an abnormality of mental functioning (AMF)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is an AMF according to Byrne?

A

it is a state of mental functioning so different from that of ordinary human beings that a reasonable man would term it abnormal

(APPLICATION)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the second element according to S.52(1)(A)

A

That the AMF must arise from a recognised medical condition (RMC)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are some examples of recognised medical conditions and cases?

A

Chronic Depression, Battered Women Syndrome
(Ahluwalia, Smith)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the third element?

A

The RMC must substantially impair D’s ability to do one or more of 3 particular things.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the three things?

A
  1. Ability to understand the nature of his conduct
  2. To form a rational judgement
  3. Or to exercise self control

APPLY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What must the impairment be?

A

Substantial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

In Egan what did the CA say ‘substantially’ meant?

A

More than trivial but less than total impairment

(APPLY)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Substantially must provide an explanation for what?

A

D’s acts and omissions in the killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

If D was intoxicated during the killing why must the jury decide? (With case)

A

Whether ignoring the intoxication, his abnormality substantially impaired his mental responsibility for his acts. (Dietschmann)

APPLY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

If relevant: if alcohol or drug use has caused degenerative changes then what?

A

D was suffering from a recognised medical condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

If relevant: if D was suffering from alcohol/drug dependency at the time of killing which didn’t cause degenerative changes what should the jury be satisfied with?

A

That drinking attributable to the dependency impaired D’s ability to do one or more of the three things under S.52(1)(A)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly