paper 1: all topics Flashcards

1
Q

what were the outcomes of the first world war?

A

-US joined the war late, lost a few soldiers, were far away from the battlefield-only losses were from German navy attacking ships
-Britain suffered during the war, over a million people had been killed during the war and country was in a huge debt
-France had the highest death toll, both civilian and military and therefore bore a huge brunt of the war, in particular on infrastructure
-Germany, despite losing the war, had not suffered as much as others, the main problem during the war was blockade

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

who were the ‘Big Three’?

A

-Lloyd George, British PM
-Clemenceau, French PM
-Woodrow Wilson, US President

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what were Clemenceau’s aims?

A

-Demanded revenge against Germany
-Wanted G army dismantled
-Massive reparations to punish G economy and used to rebuild France/pay off its debts
-Wanted the Rhinlenad to be an independent state-key border
-Regain Alsace Lorraine, share of G colonies and possibly break up G altogether

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what were Lloyd George’s aims?

A

-wanted g to pay but not excessively, so that is was powerful enough to keep Brit + G trading system
-agreed with dividing colonies but not breaking up G
-wanted reasonable reparations to pay off war damage, but not cripple G and risk revolution
-reduce army but not destroy, and reduce threat of G navy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what were Wilson’s aims?

A

-Naturally idealistic leader, wanting to keep new world order based on his 14 points
-Main aim is creation of the League of Nations to mantain peace
-All countries should disarm and dismantle armies, not just Germany
-Believed in self-determination of all nations of Europe via plebiscite
-G should pay reparations but again, not crippling amount

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what were the actual terms of the Treaty?

A

-Land-> lost 13% of land their land, rhineland demilitarised
-Army->lost 100,000 soldiers, 6 battleships, no airforce, conscription banned
-Money-> $6.6 billion in reparations
-Blame-> germany took full blame for the war

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what was the Treaty Of Neuilly?

A

1919: Bulgaria
Land-> forced to cede occupied eastern Serbian land of Yugoslavia
Army-> reduced to 20,000 men
Money-> $100 million for reparations (didn’t pay all)
Blame-> took almost none of the blame

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what was the Treaty of St Germain?

A

September 1919: Austria (helped ending the war)
Land-> lost 2/3 of land
Army-> restricted 30,000 men, forbidden to ever reunite with germany
Money-> forced to pay for all reparations of war damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what was the Treaty of Trianon?

A

1920: Hungary
Land-> lost 2/3 of their land
Army-> restricted to 35,000 men
Money-> pay few reparations
Blame-> didn’t take any of the blame

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what was the Treaty of Sevres?

A

August 1920: Ottoman Empire/Turkey
Land-> lost 83% of land 70% of population
Army-> limited to 50,000 troops, navy strictly limited, no air force
Money-> reparations were never set because of an unstable empire, economy controlled by the allies
Blame-> didn’t take any of the blame

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what was the German opinion of the Treaty?

A

-Felt that the treaty was too harsh and objected it
-double punishments to pay reparations and lose vital resources
-argued that the treaty was a diktat, as they were excluded from negotiations and had no choice but to accpet
-felt that the War Guilt Clause was an unfair justification for harshness of the treaty as war was not all their fault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what was the Political impact of the treaty?

A

-caused political instability
-treaty caused violence fistly because it created so much resentment among public, especially nationalists and made gov unpopular
-in weakening G’s armed forces, the Treaty made it more difficult to deal with political violence as well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what was the Ruhr Crisis?

A

First major crisis caused by Treaty in 1923 after failure by germans to pay second instalment of reparations
-french/belgian soldiers went into Ruhr to take payment in form of raw materials and goods
-german gov. ordered workers to go on strike so no goods were produced
-french army harshly responded, killing 100 workers
-production in the Ruhr shut down as a result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what was the Economic Crisis?

A

-German gov. paid workers during strike by printing off money however this created hyperinflation
-value of money became virtually worthless which was disaster for many G, pensioners, middle class families with savings etc
-with exception of big industrialists who used situation to pay off debts, had a terrible impact and left bitter memory even after economy recovered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

was the treaty fair on Germany? (reasons for)

A

-G was the most aggressive country during WW1, it was only fair that their army, navy and air force be targeted
-Alsace-Lorraine went back to F after G annexed it in 1871 after the Franco-Prussian Wars
-In March 1918, G forced an extremely harsh treaty on Russia when it wanted to leave the war
-G had given Austria a “Blank Cheque” to start off war as well as commencing the Schlieffen Plan, therefore deserved War Guilt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

was the treaty too harsh on Germany? (reasons against)

A

-The assassination of Archduke FF was the spark that started the war and this had nothing to do with G
-Many G citizens felt that they were being punished for the mistakes of the G gov. in August 1914 as it was the gov. that declared war not the people
-Some of the Big Three had personal interests at heart. Britain only wanted a reduced Navy so that G could not compete with them
-By restricting the army to only 100,000 the treaty left G defenceless and vulnerable meant keeping order was difficult

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what were the aims of the league?

A

-discouraging aggression from any nation and promote disarmament
-encourage nations to co-operate in areas like buisness trade
-improve living conditions of people accross the world
-Article 10 of League Covenant, essentially called the collective security

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what was the league membership?

A

-Was open to all countries, prividing they signed the Covenant of the League
-G not allowed to join due to WWI and had to rpove they were peace loving nation, were allowed to join in 1926
-USSR prevented from joining for being communist and didn’t want to join either, allowed in 1934
-USA did not join due to opposition back home, congress voted against them joining and they NEVER join

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what was the Structure of the league?

A

The Council: met three times a year, there were 4 permament members (Britain, France, Italy and Japan, G became 5th in 1926), they took most important decisions, however every decision could be vetoed by another permament member
-The Assembly: had representatives of all members and they met once a year however decisions had to be unanimous
-The Permanent Court of Justice: Was set up to settle disputes between countries, but both sides had to agree to take a dispute to the Court; so many issues never reached it and could not enforce rulings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what were some league successes in the 1920s?

A

-Greece invaded Bulgaria, which did not fight back, but appeales to the League. The League ordered Greece to withdraw, which it did
-The League settled a dispute between Germany and Poland-it had a plebiscite and suggested a partition; Germany and Poland agreed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what were some league successes in the 1920s? (living conditions)

A

-the Refugees Comittee: took charge of returning refugees and prisoners of war to their own countries, about 400,000 were returned safely due to creation of Nansen Passport
-the International Labour Organisation: the ILO brought together employees, its aim was to improve living conditions, and it tried to persuade member countries to adopt its suggestions
-The Slavery Commission: worked to abolish slavery around the world particularly in East Africa + helped workers who were treated as slaves but weren’t actually
-the Health Commitee: the WHO tried to prevent epidemic diseases such as cholera, typhoid and malaria through mosquito examination campaigns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what was the Ruhr occupation? league failure

A

-F responded to G refusal to continue reparations payments by invading Ruhr in 1923 and took control of production
-League took no effective action against F in response
-Supported idea of the League being a victors club from the war who could simply do as they pleased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what was Corfu? league failure

A

-Represents biggest failure
-Mussolini orders occupation of Greek island in 1923 after murder of Italian general on borde. Ordered the invasion after Greece refused to pay compensation and could not locate culprits
-League condemned the invasion but matter instead went to Conference of Ambassadors
-They ordered Greece to pay the excessive compensation in exchange for I withdrawing troops- Italian bullying tactics had paid off and undermined the reputation of the League
-Role of I itself, as permanent member, was a problem, showed that wrong countries had too much influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

how did the Great Depression affect the League?

A

-It destroyed the relative prosperity of the 1920s. In g it wiped out the recovery that had taken place since 1924
-this created massive unemployment and poverty, which in turn led to desperation and despair
-this led increased support for extremist parties, who used violence and adopted aggressive policies
-in J, I and G, militarism became more influential
-Major powers in the League, like Br + F no longer saw it as a priority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

what was the Manchurian Incident?

A

-the population began to grow rapidly and Japan needed more land and raw materials
-Manchuria had vast resources of coal and iron that J lacked
-In 1931, Japan invaded Manchuria, which was a province of China, claiming that they were acting in self-defence
-It claimed that a railway had been blown up at Mukden on 18th September. This was their public reason for invading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

why did the LofN fail with Manchuria?

A

-The lack of an army meant that countries had to be persuaded to declare war on Japan
-Manchuria was remote and military action would be very difficult
-The League discussed economic sanctions but it was powerless without USA main trading partner-League failed to even agree on arms sanctions on Japan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

what was the Invasion of Abyssinia?

A

-On October 1935, the Italian armed forces invaded the African state of Abassynia (Ethiopia)
-At first, the Italians faced considerable opposition,as the Abyssinians avoided a pitched battle and retreated slowly
-In early 1936, however, the Italians began to use poison gas, along with their air power, this led to the collapse of the Abyssinian forces
-In May 1936 the capital Addis Adaba was occupied and the Emperor Hailee Selassie fled to Britain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

what was the reaction of the League to Abyssinia?

A

-Sanctions were applied to Italy, including an arms embargo, banning Italian imports and all financial dealing, but oil was not included
-Mussolini later admitted that that was the one thing that would have forced him to withdraw
-In June 1936 Hailee Selassie adressed the Assembly of the LofN

29
Q

why did the League fail again with Abyssinia?

A

-League was undermined in 1935 when Brit and F tried to arrange a compromise solution to the crisis, the Hoare-Laval Pact. This would have allowed M to retain control of Abyssinia
-Both Brit and F were alarmed at events in G and wanted to keep M on their side against H
-The 3 nations had already formed the Stressa Front in 1934, Brit and F did not want M to resign from the LofN

30
Q

Abyssinia VS Manchuria:

A

-Both countries were invaded by major powers who were Permament Members of the Council
-In the case of Abyssinia, Brit and F tried to do a deal with Mussolini in the Hoare-Level pacy; when this became public, the moral authority of the League dissapeared
-Brit and F attempted to keep Mussolini ‘onside’ by preventing oil being added to the economic sanctions
-Brit also refused to close the Suez Canal; that would have paralysed Mussolini

31
Q

what were Hitler’s foreign policy aims?

A

-Abolish the Treaty: Hitler thought that the treaty was unjust and those who signed it were the ‘November criminals’, he promised to reverse it if he became leader
-Expand German territory: He wanted to regain all lost territory and reunite german speaking people, ‘lebensraum’ (living space)
-Defeat Communism: Hitler was rabidly anti-communist and believed they were actively plotting to take over G, he sought to stamp out communist nations, especially the USSR

32
Q

the Saar Plebiscite:

A

-1935
-The TofV had put the Saar under the control of LofN for 15 years, in 1935 the inhabitants voted to return to G
-H was worried about the vote as he had many political enemies, however Goebbels launch a huge propaganda campaign, in the end 90% of people vote to return to G
-It validated Nazi Regime and future claims to try and unite other German speaker

33
Q

conscription and rearmament:

A

-1935-40
-H began to slowly rearm at first, using the excuse of other countries failure to disarm
-Signed the Anglo-German naval treaty 1935 which allowed German navy to be up to 35% of British
-1936, he reintroduced conscription to the army, violation of Treaty
-Britain were sympathetic towards these aims as they felt Treaty was too harsh and a strong G was a good buffer against communism

34
Q

Remilitarisation of the Rhineland:

A

-1936
G were not allowed to put any troops into it
-March 1936, H ordered his troops to openly re-enter the Rhineland, breaking TofV
- His generals were order to retreat if French showed any hint of making a military stand against him
-This did not occur, over 32,000 soldiers crossed into the Rhineland unopposed

35
Q

why did the British and French not oppose Hitler?

A

-B believed that Germany was only going into their own “backyard” even though H was acting in a reasonable and understandable manner
-F was going through an election and leader were not willing to take responsibility for pludging F into war, they would not risk acting without British support

36
Q

Spanish Civil War:

A

1936-39
-War broke in Spain between the fascist army and republican/communist government
-H and Mussolini both became involved despite agreeing not to intervene
-G sent aircrafts and pilots to help support Franco’s forces
-Bombing of Guernica
-Due to G and I help, Franco was able to win the war in 1939

37
Q

Anschluss:

A

-1938
-annexation of Austria
-This fulfilled two main aims; overturning the Treat + uniting G speaking people
-1934, H makes inital attempt but M prevents him. H tries to use murder of the chancellor as an excuse to invade (M masses troops to the border to stop him)
-G and I become allies, 1937-> M informs the Austrian Chancellor Schussmigg he will no longer defend them

38
Q

why did the allies allow Anschluss to happen?

A

-H had armed his armed forces, B + F were had not re-aermed sufficiently for war
-B viewed Anchluss as a fair demand (tofv)
-M is no longer helping austria -> B + F could not rely in this intervention in 1938 H + M had a strong friendship

39
Q

Sudetenland Crisis:

A

-1938
-A few pieces of land in the north west of Czechoslovakia
-Leader of Sudeten Nazis began demanding unification
-H threats the Czechs with war if they didn’t agree to their demands
-The B + F had an angreement to defend Czech
-War was inevitable

40
Q

The Munich Agreement:

A

-1938
-Chamberlain flew to meet H in 15th Sept., he claimed he only wanted part of the Sudetenland
-19th, B + F put their plan to the Czhecks, H increases his demands
-He says its to reunite german speakers, chamberlain refuses, navy is mobilised (feels betrayed) and war is imminent
-final meeting 29th, in Munich. B + G + F all meet to decide that Czech would lose the S, USSR + Czcheks are not consulted

41
Q

The Invasion of Czechoslovakia:

A

-1939
-‘Lebensraum’
-Have naturals resources (H would want them for war)
-A free Czech. would make it impossible for G to fight in the West
-March 1939, took over it
-The Czechs offered no resistance, nor did B + F
-H had proved himself untrustworthy
-Appeasement was over, if H went invaded Poland, B + F would declare war, H doesn’t believe them

42
Q

Nazi - Soviet Pact:

A

-1939
-Stalin agreed to a 10 year-non aggresson pact, despite being arch-enemies (he neede to feel secure about making a move)
-They agreed to divide Poland between eachother
-Both B + F tried to negotiate a deal w/ S, Stalin signs pact with Nazi foreign minister Ribbentrop

43
Q

what were some reasons for signing the Nazi-Soviet Pact?

A

-Stalin had no trust in B + F
-B + F guarantee to Poland was seen as support for enemy
-Nazis sent top offcial, Ribbentrop to negotiation, B sent minor official on a slow boat
-Allows Stalin to re-arm and help prepare for war in the long term

44
Q

Invasion of Poland: (War Begins)

A

Sept. 1939
-Poland was quickly defeated
-B + F order H to withdraw, he refuses
-H found himself fighting the ‘wrong war’

45
Q

‘Appeasement was Justified’:

A

-Hitler was standing up to Communism - a more serious threat
-B is not ready for war
-H had fair and reasonable demands (TofV was unfair and should be reversed)
-Refusal to repeat horrors of the Great War

46
Q

‘Appeasement was NOT justified’:

A

-H was encouraged by it, gambled increasingly over the years
-H was untrustworthy- clear evidence that he was a liar (Mein Kampf)
-Allowed G to grow in stregth, G army was weak before B allowed rearmament
-Drove USSR into H arms, convinced Stalin that they could not trust the allies

47
Q

what was the cold war?

A

-the US and USSR emerged from the war as the two most powerful nations on earth
-within a few years their alliance had fully broken down and the two countries were enemies for next 40 years and the world would be divided into two ‘blocs’
-no actual war, it’s a cold war because they never directly fight

48
Q

ideological differences:

A

-the Cold War did NOT come out of nowhere in 1945, deep seated tension already existed between the two since the end of the First World War
-America was, politically, a democratic country with free elections, economically, it was a capitalist country, where the economy was mostly privately owned and also strong believed in promoting international free trade
-the USSR was a communist country, which sought to create a society where everyone was equal, in practice this meant no private ownership of property being allowed and as a consequence as well, the country was a dictatorship
-these were two visions of the world that were incompatible

49
Q

aims and motives at Yalta:

A

-each power had a range of motives and aims, but some in particular were red lines for each power, in particular:
-security for Stalin, the single most important issue to understand about him, Russia was destroyed during the war, barely survived and almost faced annihilation and felt vulnerable in the future, therefore wanted:
-a sphere of influence across eastern Europe to ensure friendly neighbours
-a weak Germany that is severely punsihed and stripped of resources
-Roosevelt had similar aims to Wilson after the First World War:
-self-determination for all countries e.g free elections and democracy
-a new League of Nations created (or United Nations in this case)

50
Q

Yalta Conference: context

A

-feb 1945
-took place as allies were invading Germany and closing in on complete victory against them
-was held at an old place in the South West of the USSR
the main issues to be discussed were:
-what to do with Germany and its leaders
-what to do with countries occupied by Germany, especially eastern Europe
-the issue of Poland
-the ongoing war with Japan (which appeared to have a long way left to go)
-how to create a lasting peace

51
Q

agreements at Yalta:

A

Germany:
-would be temporarily divided into four occupation zones, Berlin itself would also be divided into four occupation zones
-Germany would lose territory in the east to Poland and have its border moved west
-Germany had to pay reparations
Countries occupied by Germany:
-two promises made which were arguably contradictory:
-agreed that all former occupied countries by Germany would hold free elections to decide their governments
-howerver at the same time, due to his security concerns, Stalin was granted right to have a ‘sphere of influence’ in eastern Europe
Poland:
-free elections to be held, before then, a provisional government to be set up consisting of exiled ‘London Poles’ and Soviet backed ‘Lublin Poles’
-Poland would lose land to Russia in east for which they receive German land
Japan:
-Stalin agreed to help in war against Japan after Germany was defeated
Creating a lasting peace:
-a new peace keeping organization would be set up to replace the League of Nations, the United Nations

52
Q

changes between Yalta and Potsdam: actual changes

A
  1. Roosevelt had died shortly after Yalta and been replaced by Truman:
    -Rossevelt was pragmatic and always wanted to try and keep Stalin happy
    -Truman always believed Rossevelt was soft on Stalin and communism
  2. Stalin had arguably broken his promises from Yalta very quickly:
    -at the end of march, London Poles were invited to Moscow and arrested/kidnapped
    -Truman immediately told off Molotov for breaking promises when they first met
  3. US had successfully tested an atom bomb in mid-july:
    -Truman tried to intimate Stalin by telling him about this
    -Truman even less inclined to be co-operative w/Stalin as he no longer needed him
  4. Churchill lost election in July and was replaced midway by Attlee
53
Q

Potsdam Conference:

A

-july-aug 1945
-the conference, unsurprinsingly given the changing relationship since March, saw a great deal of disagreement
-there was disagreements over the future government of Poland, the exact reparation amounts Germany should pay the USSR
-however, some agreements over Germany, partially agreed at previous conferences were confirmed:
-Polish-German border moved to the Oder-Neisse line
-Nazis banned, leaders to go on war crimes trials
-division of Germany confirmed and that of Berlin

54
Q

‘Iron Curtain’ speech:

A

-the first public sign of conflict came when (former) PM Churchill gave a speech at a university (attended by Truman) denouncing the Soviet Union
-the speech became known as the ‘Iron Curtain’ speech as he used this phrase as a metaphor for the division of Europe between the free, democratic world in the west and the increasingly totalitarian world in the east
-he accused the communists of seeking to create dictatorships in eastern Europe which were controlled by the Soviet Union
-Stalin then responded aggressively in a Soviet newspaper accusing Churchill of being a warmonger, again contributed to his paranoia over western countries intentions

55
Q

how did Stalin takeover eastern Europe by 1948?

A

-in october 1946, Stalin set up the Communist Information Bureau (or cominform), to co-ordinate the work of the communist parties of eastern Europe
-cominform regularly brought the leaders of each communist part to Moscow to be briefed by Stalin and his ministers
-this also allowed Stalin to keep a close eye on them, he spotted independent-minded leaders and replaced them with people who were completely loyal to him

56
Q

US reaction to the soviet takeover:

A

-the speed and total nature of Stalin’s takeover of eastern Europe caused huge concern in the west
-this did not simply look like a ‘sphere of influence’ to ensure security for the USSR, to Truman and others, it looked like the deliberate and sinister spread global communism
-to make matters worse, the winter of 1947 saw the threat of communist takeover become a real prospect in many other countries, including in western Europe

57
Q

the Truman Doctrine:

A

-up until 1947, Truman was increasingly worried by communist expansion, but was not yet ready to take action, the real threat of Greek civil war being lost to the communists finally triggered action
-in march 1947 he gave a historic speech in which he did two things:
1. announced America would step in to support Greece-the US paid for the British troops to remain there and also funded the governement to help them fight the war (short-term significance was stopping communist taking Greece)
2. announced what became a groundbreaking a new American foreign policy, the idea of containment (really significant long-term change)

58
Q

containment:

A

-essentially, traditional US isolation was dead and instead replaced with containment
-US would now send money, equipment, or even soldiers to any country threatened with communist takeover
-had to accept eastern Europe was not communist, but US would now meet and stop communists wherever they tried to expand elsewhere, with military force if necessary

59
Q

the Marshall Plan:

A

-the Truman Doctrine was quickly followed a second, crucial part of the new American strategy
-communism was thriving in Europe after the war, particularly in 1947, due to poverty and destruction of the war
-countries were in debt, had extreme shortages of goods and basic fuel, Britain, for example, had rationing till 1950 and electricity was turned off every day in 1947
-this was a breeding ground for communism, American General George Marshall visited Europe that year and saw the despair and suggested US needed to give them around $13 billion to rebuild!

60
Q

the Marshall Plan: actual plan

A

-initially Marshall Plan was rejected by US congress, as politiciand and public were not fully convinced by need for containment, completion of takeover of Czechoslovakia (same country betrayed in 1938) convinced congress to pass it
Motivation:
1. public motive of US government-simple altruism, Europe was suffering and it was only just to offer it (even to USSR and eastern Europe!)
2. semi-public motive-US was scared of more countries being attracted to communism, especially France/Italy, rebuilding help would counter this
3. USSR accusation-‘dollar imperialism’ and self-interest, basically US would gain control over some countries economies and money would likely be spent on buying US goods, so benefits them!

61
Q

conflict over Berlin:

A

-the final event in the 1940s that confirmed the breakdown of the relationship between the US and USSR was the culmination of several years of tension over Germany after the war and Berlin
-Germany had been divided into four zones, in addition to Berlin, however the was only meant to be temporary, and despite the disagreements at Potsdam, the four powers were meant to make joint decisions over the future of Germany
-however, unsurprinsingly, as the relationship between the powers broke down, so too did co-operation over Germany, by 1948 it became a major cause of conflict between them

62
Q

buildup of conflict over Germany:

A

-not long after the war, the US and Britain decided they wanted to help Germany rebuild and recover (especially through the Marshall Plan in 1947), whereas Stalin was adamant about keeping them weak and exploiting them for USSR rebuilding
-without any agreement, Britain and US pressed ahead with their plans (which France eventually joined) by merging their zones to form Bizonia (Trizonia)
-they quickly began to buildup their zones which started to recover, while Stalin’s sector remained poor and backgrounds and in 1948 formed a new currency
-Stalin felt these were provocative moves and felt threatened by it all

63
Q

the Berlin Blockade:

A

1948-49
-Stalin had no way of stopping US and Britain from pursuing their plans, but at least could control Berlin and take that as a victory
-he decided to blockade Berlin in June 1948, by cutting off all supply lines to it from the western sectors by road, canal and railway, this would starve the 2 million inhabitants of West Berlin and force Berlin to accept USSR authority
-the US could NOT force their way through the blockade or it would cuase war, however, they could not simply give up Berlin, this would become a serious test of containment and how much the US was willing to defend their principles

64
Q

the US response- Berlin Airlift:

A

-the US and its allies decided to airlift supplies into Berlin
-intially was still a risk given possibility Stalin might order planes shot down, which would have caused war, however he did not, and planes went in night and day without stopping for next for next ten months
-everything was airlifted in, including food, building materials, fuels etc. despite shortages and rationing, it was clear by following year that blockade had failed to force Berliners to give in, and Stalin was forced to open negotiations and lift blockade in May 1949

65
Q

consequences of the Blockade:

A

-the blockade had several direct and indirect consequences, mainly:
1. confirmed the division of Germany-Germany had been moving to division in previous years, but blockade confirmed it, within a year, two seperate independent states were formed in east and west
2. Germany, and Berlin, had become a symbol of the Cold War-this one country was now divided between the two sides of the iron curtain and a propaganda symbol for each, e.g. Berlin, a democratic island in repressive east
3. creation of security pacts NATO/Warsaw Pact-war was real possibility at the height of the crisis and so western countries met and signed a collective security agreement (in practice, US pledge to protect), USSR formed similar pact in 1955 in response to Wesr Germany joining NATO

66
Q

who was to blame for the Cold War? : Stalin/USSR to blame

A

-Stalin was ideological expansionist who wanted global domination
-he did not abide his promises at Yalta and imposed communist gov. in Poland etc. Imprisioned any critic, always used ideological language when condemning west and justifying actions
-Stalin was a uniquely paranoid and problematic leader to deal with
-dealt with opponents extremely ruthlessly at home for same reasons
-interpreted all moves as threat to him
-it was Stalin who always took the most clearly provocative and undermocratic actions, e.g. his takeover of eastern Europe, his attempt to takeover Berlin was very reckless and risked war

67
Q

who was to blame for the Cold War? : Stalin/USSR not to blame

A

-Stalin was always pragmatic and tried to compromise and find solutions with west wherever possible, he abided intially by Yalta agreements (mostly) and it was clear he did not want to risk causing upset to western countries with takeover, e.g. he NEVER helped Greek communists
-Stalin had legitimate and genuine security interests in taking eastern Europe (and other paranoia), USSR came genuinely close to annihilation in war, west had historically conspired against him, arguably even during the war
-Stalin was in a weak position after the war and knew it/behaved in that way, he wanted US help and, for example, genuinely considered Marshall aid but believed motives could not be trusted

68
Q

who was to blame for the Cold War? : Truman/USA to blame

A

-Truman was an aggressive and overly firm leader who ruined co-operation, unlike Roosevelt he did not understand need to be pragmatic, never had any intention of compromise with US, responsible for many provocative moves, ‘atomic diplomacy’, Truman Doctrine/Marshall Aid, Germany plans etc.
-US was ideological in their desire to create global free markets for US goods to trade in, wanted a free open world, not for good of world, but for own benefit, especially Marshall Plan
-US was in a very powerful position after the war, far more than the USSR and felt no genuine threat from them and had no justifiable reason to feel that way about them

69
Q

who was to blame for the Cold War? : Truman/USA not to blame

A

-Truman was simply a man of principle who hated the idea of having to make a compromise with a man like Stalin, even then, his actions were never proactive, but response mainly to Soviet actions, e.g.takeover of Europe and communist threat, took no real action until 1947
-Truman was NOT irresponsible in actions he took against USSR, containment was not provocative as he accepted that nothing could be done about eastern Europe and he was instead simply focused on protecting western European democracies
-Truman genuinely was simply trying to learn the lessons of Second World War, like many of his generation, the feeling was to not allow another totalitarian dictator have his way in Europe