history mocks paper 2+4: Flashcards
what was containment?
-by the end of the 1940s, the US government had decided on what its strategy and approach would be towards communism after the war
-Truman settled on idea of containment, the basic idea being that the US would seek to stop the spread of communism wherever it sought to expand across the global, this could mean anything up to and including military action
-HOWEVER, must be contrasted with rollback, which was the active attempt to actually remove communism from countries, up to and including eastern Europe and the USSR itself
containment and the domino theory:
-working hand in hand with containment, was the ‘domino theory’, which stated that if one country in a region fell to communism, the countries around it would follow a domino effect
-this became a source of great paranoia in Asia in particular due to the fall of China to communism in 1949, Asia would therefore be one of the earliest ‘containment’ battlegrounds for the US
case study Korea 1:
-Korea was the first real Cold War conflict, the Berlin Blockade was the first confrontation, but the Cold War became a ‘hot war’ in Korea
-often referred to as the ‘forgotten war’, received little public attention long-term as Second World War preceded and was bigger, and Vietnam war came shortly after and caused far more social upheaval in America
-a huge conflict despite its lack of attention, 2-3 million dead civilians, over a million military casualties and involved 100s of thousands of US soldiers
background to conflict-end of second world war:
-Korea had been ruled by Japan until the end of the Second World War, at the end of the war, Korea was temporarily divided (not unlike Germany) into two occupation zones:
-Soviet occupied North
-American occupied South
-border at the ‘38th parallel’
-as relations between the two worsened however, unification seemed less likely
-in 1948, separate independent states were set up in the North and South
conflict between north and south Korea:
-the two governments set up despised each other:
-South Korea (Republic of Korea) was setup under Syngman Rhee, was not very democratic but was staunchly anti-communist, enough to get US support
-North Korea (Democratic People’s Republic) was set up under Kim II-Sung who was a soviet-trained and backed communist running a I-party state
-both leaders believed that they had the right to rule all of Korea and wanted the peninsula reunified
-given their hostility however there was no chance at all of the two countries peacefully unifying
why did war break out?
-in the summer of 1950, Kim II-Sung made his move and decided to invade the South, he did this in order to unify Korea and eliminate, what he considered to be, the illegitimate government in the South
-whilst this seems a rash move in hindsight, at the time he had good reason to believe he would be successful:
-he was backed by both Stalin and Mao (USSR and China) and had been heavily armed by the Soviets with tanks, artillery, planes-was stronger than the south
-the proximity of Korea to China and the soviets having the bomb made it seem unlikely the US would act in response
-additionally Korea was far away and likely would not be a defense priority for the US
how did the US respond?
-contrary to Kim’s beliefs, the US were determined to get involved and stop the South being taken over, this was because:
-they were now committed to the policy of containment, communism was also seen as always directed by Moscow, so this was not a faraway conflict but a soviet plan
-linked to the domino theory, the total fall of Korea would lead to fall of other US-backed nations, e.g: new Chinese gov in Taiwan and Japan (big US trade partner post-war)
-when the US became involved, however, it was not on their own, but instead an official intervention/action by the newly formed United Nations (UN/UNO)
how did the UNO become involved?
-Truman would have intervened in Korea no matter what happened, but to make things look better he wanted the UNO to get involved officially instead
-Truman immediately took the matter to the UN security council and began applying pressure to pass a resolution to call for military action
-therefore even though it was clearly a US-led operation, UN voted in favour, which meant the anti-communist forces were a coalition of 15 countries
-normally this should not have been possible as the USSR had a veto power on the council
-however, USSR had been boycotting UN meetings over previous issue of whether to allow communist China to join, therefore were not available at meetings to use veto power
events of the Korean war:
-June to Sep 1950: northern communists invade south and quickly overwhelm them and occupied most of the peninsula
-Sep to Oct 1950: UN forces land in two locations, Pusan and Inchon and communists driven back beyond 38th parallel within weeks
-Oct 1950: despite initial containment objective being achieved, UN forces (directed by Truman and General MacArthur) pushed on into the north
events of the Korean war: 2.0
-Nov 1950: feeling threatened by the US push, the chinese government intervened and sent 200,000 soldiers to cross the border UN forces were pushed back into south Korea, the chinese army was well equipped and more accustomed to the fighting conditions
-Truman accepted that containment and protection of south Korea was good enough and ignored advice by MacArthur to invade China
-June 1951: stalemate around 38th parallel, led to peace talks and eventual armistice in 2 years later
outcomes of the war:
success for the US:
1. achieved initial short-term aim of protecting south from communism and halting invasion-successful ‘containment’
2. showed the world US was willing to confront communism by force
failures of the US:
1. US failed to achieve later expanded aims of re-uniting Korea under democratic, non-communist rule, however chinese intervention foiled this and future threat of north would remain
2. conflict exposed major tensions between US leaders of foreign policy and the sacked MacArthur received a heroic welcome when he returned
On what factors was the economic boom based? (8)
-Resources
-Impact of the First World War
-Technological change
-Mass-production
-Mass-marketing
-Credit
-Confidence
-The policies of the Republican Presidents
resources:
-US had a great store of natural resources: wood, iron, coal, minerals, oil and land
-helped America to become a great industrial power by the beginning of the 20th century + provided a sound basis for further expansion in the 1920s
Impact of First World War:
-US had come out the war well, it had supplied Europe with many goods during the war + had taken over European overseas markets
-in some areas, US industry was now the world leader, e.g: chemicals
-there was hastened technological change which US industry seized on
Technological change:
-plastics like Bakelite were developed effectively for the first time and were used in new household products
-automatic swicthboards, glass tubing, conveyor belts, and concrete mixers
-helped modernise existing industries + develop new ones
-the most important change was the introducing of electricity
-electricity provided a cheaper, more efficient source of power for factories + led the production of new consumer goods such as refrigerators, vacuum cleaners and radios
Mass-production:
-new technique meant that goods could be produced much more cheaply on a large scale
-Henry Ford had developed mass-production in the car industry by introducing an assembly line before the war
-he made cars so cheaply that thousands of ordinary Americans could afford them
-in the 1920s, his ideas were applied throughout industry, particularly to the new consumers products
Mass-marketing:
-mass-produced good have to be sold to a mass market: if enough people do not know about or buy the goods, the system will collapse
-so companies spent huge amounts on advertising
-this new industry developed sophisticated techniques to persuade people to buy
-the expansion of the mail-order companies gave consumers in the countryside access to the wide range of goods on offer
Credit:
-the growth of credit made it much easier for people to buy goods even though they did not have enough cash to pay for them on the spot
-firms arranged for customers to pay by instalment or hire purchase