Paper 1 Flashcards
Liberalism Thinkers
John Locke
Wollstonecraft
Mill
Rawls
Friedan
Locke’s ideas
Social Contract Theory - Society, state and government are based on consensual agreement
Limited Gov - Gov should be limited and based on consent from the people
Wollstonecraft ideas
Reason - Women are rational and independent
Formal Equality - Women should be able to enjoy full civil liberties and allowed to have a career
Mill’s ideas
Harm Principle - Individuals should be able to do anything as long as it harms no-one
Tolerance - belief that the popularity of the view does not make it correct
Rawls ideas
Theory of Justice - society must be just and guarantee a citizen a life worth living
Veil of Ignorance - people would want society to be fair if they didn’t know where they would end up in the hypothetical society
Friedan Ideas
Legal Equality - women are as capable as men and oppressive laws and social views should be overturned
Equal Opportunity - women are being held back due to limited number of jobs “acceptable” for women and should be able to have the same opportunities
Modern vs Classical Liberals on human nature
AGREE - Rationality - free from state interference - have boundless capabilities
AGREE - Stress importance of individuals with equal rights - (Locke) Capacity for reason
DISAGREE - Motivation - Classical egotistical individualism - humans are self interested and they are fixed/ Modern developmental individualism - human nature isn’t fixed and flourishing knows no bounds
Modern vs Classical Liberals on state
AGREE - agree on dispersing power (devolution)
DISAGREE - Size - Classical = limited state with no interference in lives/ Modern = enabling state - support some interference to help people born with disparities so they can succeed
DISAGREE - Intervention in the economy - Classical = No intervention in the economy (Laissez-faire economy) - ‘invisible hand’ / Modern - Keynesian economics - some intervention to prevent a complete and collapse and manage it so can limit homelessness and joblessness - off of the Great Depression
Modern vs Classical Liberals on economy
AGREE - Free market capitalism and free trade between nations - unleashes potential of individuals
AGREE - All favour wider ownership - avoid concentrations of power and encourage meritocracy
DISAGREE - Laissez Faire vs Keynesian
Modern vs Classical Liberals on society
AGREE - Tolerance - accepting of differences as long is does not restrict others - individualism
AGREE - Freedom from the state - Wollstonecroft thought it was women’s choice if they remained in a traditional role in the private sphere - private realm left free from interference - Freedom from discrimination
DISAGREE - How much can society support freedom - Modern Liberals = Positive freedoms - freedoms to - state removes barriers from people’s freedoms/ Classical = freedom from high taxes so no welfare - negative freedoms = freedom from
Conservative Thinkers
Thomas Hobbes
Edmund Burke
Oakeshott
Rand
Nozick
Hobbes Ideas
Order - ordered society balance the human need to lead a free life
Human Nature - humans are needy, vulnerable and easily led astray in attempts to understand the world around them
Burke Ideas
Change - political change should be with caution and organically
Tradition and empiricism - tradition should be respected
Oakeshott ideas
Human Imperfection - society is unpredictable and humans are imperfect
Pragmatism - belief Conservatism is about being pragmatic
Rand ideas
Objectivism - advocates virtues of rational self interest
Freedom - supports pure laissez faire economy
Nozick ideas
Libertarianism - humans cannot be treated as a thing or used against their will as a resource
Self ownership - individuals own their own bodies, talents, abilities and honours
Conservative views on Human Nature
AGREE - humans are self interested so universal equality is impossible - grant property and reward effort are best
DISAGREE - neoconservative pessimists vs neoliberal optimists (Hobbes vs Rand) - fear of chaos and need for order vs love of and need for freedom
DISAGREE - Understanding - Traditional = humans ain’t capable of complex ideas / New Right = humans are capable of understanding
Conservative views on society
AGREE - Humans are self interested and flawed - attempts to impose an engineered society will end up doomed
DISAGREE - One Nation paternalists vs neoliberal minarchists - ON = role of state in providing welfare (paternalism) / NL = fear of a dependency culture and ‘road to serfdom’
DISAGREE - Traditional communitarians vs neoliberal rationalists (Burke vs Rand) - T = organic society of little platoons held together by morals and tradition / NL = atomistic rational individualists - reflected in hierarchy vs meritocracy
Conservative views on the state
AGREE - Reject totalitarian state will to create a perfect society - cruel and doomed
AGREE - Due to human imperfection, state is necessary to provide some control over humans to keep them in line and keep justice and prevent threats
DISAGREE - One nation paternalists vs neoliberal minarchists - ON = role of state to provide for some people (paternalism/welfare) / NL = fear of dependency culture
Conservatives views on the economy
AGREE - rejection of nationalisation of industries and redistribute wealth - profit encourages competition
AGREE - individual property ownership should be encouraged as it develops responsibility and effort and innovation
DISAGREE - ON vs NL - role of state in steering the economy to avoid unemployment vs laissez faire economics with no interference and free markets and trade
Socialism key thinkers
Marx and Engels
Webb
Luxemburg
Crosland
Giddens
Marx and Engels ideas
Centrality of social class - ideas of historical materialism, dialect change and revolutionary class consciousness
Humans as social beings - how nature is socially determined and how true common humanity can be expressed only under communism
Webbs ideas
Inevitability of gradualness - gradualist parliamentary strategy for achieving evolutionary socialism
Expansion of the state - this and not the overthrow of the government is vital to achieving evolutionary socialism
Luxemburg’s ideas
Evolutionary socialism and revisionism - not possible as capitalism is based on an economic relationship of exploitation
Struggle by the proletariat for reform and democracy - creates class consciousness necessary to overthrow the capitalist society and state