paper 1 Flashcards
durkheim
(functionalist view on education)
edu helps produce social solidarity.
school is mini society - education teaches skills for future occupation
important for modern industrialised societies bc of specialised division of labour
parsons
(functionalist view on education)
edu creates a bridge between particularistic values of family and the universalistic values of society.
edu gives secondary socialisation
davis and moore
(functionalist view on education)
educations function is role allocation - right job for right person (talent ,ability, hard work)
edu system is meritocratic. hard work = highly paid job
criticisms of functionalist view (durkheim)
many job skills are learnt on the job
passing down norms and values reproduces capitalist ideology and class inequality.
criticisms of functionalist view (parsons)
universalistic values of society are actually capitalist values, giving advantage to middle class
criticisms of functionalist view (davis & moore)
no equality of opporunity.
althusser
(marxist view on education)
isa - education spreads the capitalist ideology
rsa - helps maintain the rule of the capitalist class by force (police/army)
bordieu
(marxist view on education)
edu reproduces class inequality.
habitus = cultural framework possessed by a social class.
ruling class impose their habitus on the education system.
m/c advantaged due to cultural capital.
bowles and gintis
(marxist view on education)
helps reproduction of the labour force.
correspondence principle - relationships and structures found in school mirror those of the workplace.
hidden curriculum - informal learning occuring outside of the classroom.
criticism of marxist view (althusser)
assumes the passive acceptance of capitalism
criticism of marxist view (bordieu)
not all the w/c do poorly in the education system
criticism of marxist view (bowles & gintis)
assumes students passively accept the attitudes and behaviours taught in the hidden curriculum.
differences in educational achievement (material factors: housing)
overcrowding = difficulty studying bc of less space and disturbed sleep.
temporary accommodation = moving around disrupts education
cold/damp = ill health / absence
differences in educational achievement (material factors: diet and health)
howard - poorer homes = lower intakes of energy, vitamins and minerals = weakened immune systems - absence from school
poorer homes more likely to face emotional / behavioural issues
differences in educational achievement (material factors: finances of education)
tanner et al -
cost of equipment , books, resources, uniform and transport are a burden on poor families
cheaper equipment purchased - lead to bullying - isolation
differences in educational achievement (material factors: fear of debt)
w/c students see uni dept as bad so they are 5x less likely to go to uni (callendar&jackson)
differences in educational achievement (cultural factors: speech codes)
bernstein -
restricted code - w/c ,limited vocab
elaborated code - m/c, extensive vocab, grammatically complex. m/c are advantaged as EC is used in textbooks, exams and by teachers
differences in educational achievement (cultural factors: parenting style)
higher education parents = consistent discipline = high expectations - support for active learning
lower educated parents - harsh discipline - stops child learning independence and elf control = less motivation
differences in educational achievement (cultural factors: parents educational behaviour)
HE parents = aware of what is needed - read books, sing songs and paint with their children
recognise the educational value of school trips
have good teacher relations and guide children’s interactions
gender differences in educational achievement GIRLS (external factor: feminism)
movement for change - women able to vote
women in high jobs
gives girls encouragement - want to be like the women they see
gender differences in educational achievement GIRLS (external factor: changes to women’s employment)
1970 equal pay act - gives girls encouragement due to more equality
Gershuny - more women now in paid employment
gender differences in educational achievement GIRLS (external factor: changing ambitions)
sharpe
compared the attitudes of w/c girls in London schools in the early 1970’s / 1990’s, using unstructured interviews.
70s - husband, love and families
90s - job, career, supporting themselves.
gender differences in educational achievement GIRLS (external factor: changing families)
increase in lone parent families (role models)
increase in gender equality (women can be breadwinners too)
encourages girl to aspire for careers so they can focus on their education
gender differences in educational achievement BOYS (external factor: decline in traditional men’s jobs)
globalisation has meant manufacturing jobs have moved out of the uk to china for lower wages
mitsos & browne
reduction in men’s jobs have resulted in an ‘identity crisis’
gender differences in educational achievement BOYS (external factor: literacy skills)
mothers read to their children - boys see reading as feminine
parents read less to their sons as they assume they are not interested
boys leisure skills (football) do not require verbal communication skills
DEA and gender socialisation
NORMAL 1998
boys and girls are dressed differently and given different toys from a young age
DEA and gender socialisation
BYRNE 1979
boys are encouraged to be strong and tough, whilst girls are encouraged to be neat, clean and tidy
DEA and gender socialisation
ELWOOD 1998
boys read hobby books and information books, whilst girls read stories about other people
DEA and subject choice
- girls choose english and boys chose maths
(gendered subject images, gendered career opportunities, gender identity and peer pressure)
DEA and gendered subject images
SKELTON ET AL 2007
boys and girls were drawn to subjects that fit with their gender
DEA and gendered subject images
COLLEY 1998
computer studies is similar to working with machines (male domain)
girls are put off by this teaching style
DEA and gendered subject images
LEONARD 2006
single sex schools hold less stereotyped images on subjects.
institute of physics found these girls are 2.4 x more likely to study physics at A level
DEA and gender identity / peer pressure
PAECHTER 1998
girls opt out of sport bc it is associated as manly
girls who are sporty feel like they are contradicting their image and gender stereotype
‘peers police one another’s subject chocie’
DEA and ethnicity
STRAND 2010
looked at national cohort of yr 11s.
black pupils not eligible for FSM - suggested they are not from low income families but still make less progress than their white classmates
ethnocentric racism
based on the worldwide view of one culture and devalues other cultures
DEA and ethnicity
(internal factor: ethnocentric curriculum)
COARD 2005 - curriculum sees whites as good and blacks as primitive
ethnic groups = unable to learn their own heritage.
BALL - ‘little englandism’ in the curriculum which focuses on the british empire.
DEA and ethnicity
(internal: labelling and teacher racism)
GILLBORN & YOUDELL 2000
teachers quicker to discipline black pupils than those with the same behaviour.
racialised expectations - behaviour misjudged as threatening and is negatively responded to.
DEA and ethnicity
(internal: labelling and teacher racism)
STRAND 2012
teachers judge ability based on behaviour
black pupils seen as disruptive - end up in lower streams
DEA and ethnicity
(internal: labelling and teacher racism)
WRIGHT 1992
believed asian pupils lower levels of english = left them out of discussions
see asian pupils as a problem they could just ignore