Pain Flashcards
Inflammation
The body’s response to damage in order to remove the stimuli (infection/pathogen) and start the healing process
Hypersensitivity is the cause of inflammation and adaptive- helps protect from further pain and damage, healing faster!
Injury blood vessels dilate cells are recruited to repair damage
and control pathogens
Stages to inflammation- redness and heat, swelling, throbbing/pain leads to loss of function during healing
Inflammatory mediators
“Algogens of the inflammatory soup”
Complicated process
Open wound, germs and bacteria are entering- Following injury, cells are recruited to area- to release chemicals to cause healing
Bradykinin- inc ap firing peripheral activation
Inflammatory mediators
Bradykinin
Bradykinin
Released from plasma (mast cells and macrophages) after tissue injury
Produces pain in humans when administered (inc sensitivity to heat activates trpv1)
Activates PKC and possibly TRPV1 channels
Two receptors: B1 and B2
B1 antagonists – no effect
B2 antagonists – reduced C fiber sensitization
B2 qfter injury- rise in mrna, making more, inc receptors, casuing peripheral sensitization
Increased B2 receptor mRNA in the DRG after injury
Negligible effect on B1 receptors
Inflammatory mediators
Prostaglandins- nsaids inhibit
Prostaglandins- nsaids inhibit
First isolated from seminal fluid (prostate)
Derived from fatty acids found in the membrane
Locally-active and produced all over
Two cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes (COX-1 and COX-2) – target of NSAIDS
Both involved in the synthesis of PGE2
COX-1 – baseline prostaglandins
COX-2 – stimulated prostaglandins (inflammation)
Major peripheral effect of PGE2 is to sensitize neurons to noxious stimuli
Modulated through PKA and activity of Nav1.8- sodium channel inc activation
Inflammatory mediators Serotonin
Serotonin
Involved in descending pain modulation
Different peripheral vs central receptors have different effects
Released from platelets and mast cells after injury, contributing to pain sensitization — lots of receptors on DRG neurons
5HT receptors activate PKA and PKC to open TRPV1 channels and Nav 1.8, work by controlling and modulating channels important for pain, makes them work better
Many possible actions due to the (approx.) 17 subunits for 5HT receptors
Ondansetron, the 5-HT3 antagonist- blocks it, reduces allodynia in rats, when given into the spine
Neuropathic model- sni, 5ht3 antagonist reduces alloydnia
Inflammatory mediators
Histamine- important for allergic reactions
Histamine- important for allergic reactions Histamine- important for allergic reactions
Substance P and PGE2 cause the release of histamine from mast cells
Most often associated with itch, pain and motion sickness
Potentiates nociceptor response to heat and bradykinin- modulating trpv1 receptors
Control animals (open circles) show an increased response to heat following histamine treatment
Inflammatory mediators atp Adenosine
ATP rekeased during skin damage , activate p2x or p2y recpetors Adenosine
During inflammation and injury adenosine, AMP, ADP and ATP are released
Adenosine binds to A2 receptors
ATP binds to P2X receptors to initiate cytokine production and release
Agonists increase pain, antagonists block pain
Bbg- works on p2x- gives food blue colour, can block p2x, prevent allodynia in sni mice, and promote recovery when given after injury
BBG
BBG is an analogue to the food coloring in blue Gatorade and blue Smarties
– To reverse allodynia, the dose needed turns the blood blue and any tissue that it bathes
Inflammatory mediators Cytokines- released by macrophages
Cytokines- released by macrophages Cytokines- released by macrophages
During inflammation macrophages release interleukins to regulate the response
Pro-inflammatory cytokines
Major: IL-1β, IL-6, TNFα
Minor: IFNγ, IL-8, IL-11, IL-12, IL-17, IL-18, IL-33
Anti-inflammatory cytokines
Major: IL-4, IL-10, IL-13
Minor: IL-16, IFNα, TGFβ
Injection of IL-1β into the paw increased pain in a dose-dependent manner
Cytokines regulate pain sensitivity
Allodynia after injury
Increased IL-10 gene decreases allodynia
Antibody binds to IL-10 increases allodynia
Addition of IL-10 protein reduces allodynia
IL-10, anti-inflammatory
Neurotrophins and Pain
NGF- regulates nerve growth, synaptic plasticity
Mostly fpund in peripheral fibres
Can be released into spinal cord
NGF and BDNF- work with same receptors- the trx a or b family
NGF- have peripherial nerve and apply it, have neuronal sprouting, trying to inc connectivity of neurons, promoting nerve growth
Causes peripheral sensitixation- makes system more responsive to all stimuli and inc inflammatory and pain components in drg
Causes central sensitization- substance p, cgrp in dorsal horn of spinal cord
Inflammatory mediators Nerve growth factors
Blockade of NGF reduces
sensitivity to touch
Give antibody against NGF- reduce sensitivity and sensitization
Inflammatory mediators Protons
Protons
Tissue damage can cause release of protons
Low pH (acidic) solutions cause pain through nociceptor activation
Receptor in DRG and nocioceptors senses ph changes, acid — ASIC (Acid-Sensing Ion Channel), activate drg
Adenosine binds to A2 receptors
ATP binds to P2X receptors to initiate cytokine production and release
Agonists increase pain, antagonists block pain
Injections of acidic saline (pH = 4.0) into the muscles produces long-lasting sensitivity in both legs, activate asic, causing sensitivity on both sides- mirror pain
This doesn’t happen with pH = 7.2
Inflammatory mediators
Substance P
Substance P released from end of nocioceptors, driven by axon reflux,
Released from sensory nerve terminals (c-fibers) upon injury or infection
– causes inflammatory response
Internalization of receptor (NK1) associated with chronic pain
Can be released antidromically- in opposite direction then normal(primary afferent, now released from dendrites)
where it contributes to mast celldegranulation
Plasma extravasation – blood vessels become leaky and dilate refers to the movement of white blood cells from the capillaries to the
tissues surrounding, more opportunity to release inflammation
Substance P- works
peripherally and centrally
When given into the spine, substance P causes allodynia in mice, dose-dependently
Pattern Recognition Receptors
Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns
Recognition of conserved aspects of bacteria and viruses
Examples include toll-like receptors (TLRs)
TLR2 and TLR4 recognize yeast and bacteria, respectively
Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns
Recognize proteins present in cytosol and nucleus of cells
Examples include P2X4 and P2X7
Signal that cell has died
How does the immune system contribute to pain and inflammation?
Innate immune system
Recognition of pathogens based on structural conservation
Theories of pain
Specifity theory
These are not very acurate
Specificity theory
Von Frey (1894) - Postulated that there were specific receptors (nociceptors) that recognized pain and sent signals directly to the brain’s pain center
Neurons respond to pain or they don’t respond at all- not the case
Impulses- axons firing, vs intensity
Neurons don’t respond to innocuous, only noxious
Reach certain point- becomes painful, but after injury nonpainful stimuli becomes painful- allodynia
Intensity theory
Intensity theory
Erb (1874) – Claimed that pain was produced by stronger activation of nerves by an intense stimulus, while a weak stimulus produced non-painful sensation.
Pain is generated based on intensity of sensory nerve activation
More intense stimuli/more action potentials = more painful
Problems with specificity/intensity theory
Problems with specificity/intensity theory
Receptors would only ever signal pain (specificity)- not the case, diffrenet neurons in spinal cord that revieve stimuli of touch too- wide range neurons
Both can’t explain: Phantom limb pain, spontaneous pain, pain denial
(soldiers in battle)
Wide dynamic range- both ad, c and ab vs nociceptive specific- c and ad
Need direvt activation of nocioceptive- not always the cause
Pattern theory
Pattern theory
Developed as an alternative to specificity theory
Pain is produced through a pattern of receptor activation
Hebbian summation may play a role in chronic pain
Pain intensity is coded by pattern activation of different fibres- some fibres are less or more activated than innocuous- different cells need different activation to cause pain- cant tell the pattern that codes for pain
Predifined pattern and each cell needs activation state to cause pain
Problems with pattern theory
Problems with pattern theory
Ignored physiological specialization of fibers- some fibres code for pain, doent need to be more or less activated
Cell types are unspecified and impossible to study
No experimental verification- cant test it
Control gate theory
Physiological and psychological aspects
Most influential theory of pain, ever
Synthesized components of previous theories into an overall theory
Based on physiology and clinical experience
There is a “gate” in the spinal cord that can be opened or closed to pain- neurons within allow or inhibit pain transmission
Brain has master control- descending modulation, brain can trump pain- can dampen pain signals
Most reffered to
Melzack- did this and mcgill pain questionnaire
Gate control theory
Substantia gelatinosa (SG)- layer modulates input before it is sent to the T cells- interneuron within SG, inhibitory
Central transmission cells (T) are cells in the SG that project to the brain- second order projection neurons
In the yellow box- dorsal horn of spinal cord- have two types of cell here and spinal types coming in
Have fibres coming in
Small diameter- c fibres or adelta- noxiuous stimuli
Large diameter- a beta
Activate small diameter fibres- activate t neuron and inhibiting SG neuron- presynaptic inhibtion
Anything that activates t neurons- code for pain, allow for pain to transmit
Large diameter- activates SG neuron- inhibiting input at t neuron, pain cant transmit, reducing pain
Start to rub painful area- inhibits pain, because ab fibre activating SG neurons, modulating the pain
Have a beta at top and adelta and c further
Ron welzack- gave idea that brain has control
Helped explain Why rubbing makes pain hurt less
Reduced L fibers in post-herpetic neuralgia- have reduced large diameter
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation- mild current run through ends of patch- activates only ab- making pain better
Gate control theory can’t explain
Phantom limb pain
Primary afferent termination patterns- know that primary afferent synapse and connect with more than just SG layer