Page 7 Flashcards
An offer can only be accepted by who?
- The identified offeree, or
- Anyone in the general public with knowledge of the offer if it is a public offer
When is an acceptance effective?
On dispatch
What are the three major issues in figuring out whether an offer has been accepted?
- the KIND of acceptance
- whether SILENCE can be acceptance
- if the acceptance DEVIATES from the terms of the offer
Can an acceptance be ambiguous?
No, it must be unequivocal
What is UCC acceptance?
Acceptance can be by any medium reasonable under the circumstances
Is the UCC version of acceptance more or less flexible than common-law?
Much more flexible, they wanted to make it as easy as possible
What are all the different ways you can accept an offer under the UCC?
- promise
- performance
- conduct
- language
** basically anything works
Can an acceptance state terms additional to or different from those agreed on under UCC?
Yes, unless acceptance is expressly made conditional on assent to those different or additional terms
Can UCC acceptance diverge significantly on a dickered term?
No
How are counteroffers limited under the UCC?
They are limited to situations where the words of acceptance are expressly conditioned on a new or different time
What is an example of a counteroffer under the UCC?
“I will buy it, but only if you deliver it on Saturday”
What are things that indicate a counteroffer under the UCC?
Words like “but only if” or “on condition that” or “provided that”
If you say, “I will buy it, please deliver on Saturday,” is that a condition?
No, but it is a new or different term
Does the UCC like counteroffers?
No, new or different terms aren’t usually treated as counteroffers, instead the code looks for the language where the parties agreed and that will be the contract
How would the UCC treat the following statement? “I will buy it, please deliver on Saturday.”
A contract to buy the property, and delivery on Saturday is a new or different term that is treated differently depending on whether a merchant or non-merchant is involved
What are the differences between how to deal with a new/different term in an acceptance depending on whether you’re a merchant or non-merchant?
- non-merchant party rule: if either/both parties are not merchants, the new/different term is a proposal for addition to the contract and can be separately accepted/rejected and there will still be a contract
- merchants: new/different term automatically becomes part of the contract unless:
- the offer was limited to only its terms
- the offeror expressly rejects the new term
- the new term materially alters the contract