PA3 Flashcards
Define validity and validation
Validity: a judgment or estimate of how well a test measures what it purports to measure.
Validation: the process of gathering and evaluating evidence about validity
What are the 4 main types of validity, and which of these is the most important “umbrella” term?
Face validity
Content validity
Criterion validity
Construct validity***
What is face validity?
How relevant the test items APPEAR to be.
If a test appears to measure what it purports to measure “on the face of it,” it has high face validity.
What is content validity?
How adequately a test samples the whole “universe” of the behaviour or criterion that the test was designed to sample (including the types of information to be covered, the number of items tapping each area of coverage, the organisation of the items in the test, etc.)
Describe how Lawshe’s (1975) content validity ratio (CVR) works
- Select a panel of experts in the content area
- Ask them to rate each item as one of:
a) essential
b) useful but not essential
c) not necessary - Use the content validity ratio (CVR) formula:
If CVR is:
• Negative= fewer than half panelists chose “essential”
• Zero=exactly half panelists chose “essential”
• Positive =more than half panelists chose “essential”
Describe two ways content validity can be variable
- Can change over time as construct research evolves
2. Can vary between cultures
Define criterion related validity and criterion
Criterion related validity: a judgment of how adequately a test score correlates with some measure of interest (i.e. the criterion). The criterion is an accepted standard against which a test or a test score is evaluated.
Describe and give examples of the two main types of criterion related validity
Concurrent validity: an index of the degree to which a test score is related to some criterion measured at the same time, eg. client does two tests at the same session, one of which is new and one is the “gold standard”.
Predictive validity: an index of the degree to which a test score predicts some criterion, or outcome, measured in the future eg. how well does an IQ test predict future exam results
In criterion‐related validity, what is the validity coefficient?
A correlation coefficient that provides a measure of the relationship between test scores and scores on the criterion measure.
In criterion‐related validity, what is incremental validity?
The degree to which an added predictor in a test explains additional variation in the criterion (outcome) measure
In criterion‐related validity, what is an expectancy table?
A table showing the proportions of people within different test‐score intervals who subsequently rated in various categories of the criterion (e.g. “passed” vs “failed” a job interview)
What is construct validity?
The ability of a test to measure the theorized construct (e.g. intelligence, aggression, personality, etc.) that it purports to measure.
If a test is a valid measure of a construct, high scorers and low scorers should behave as theorized.
Al other types of validity “feed into” construct validity.
What are convergent evidence and discriminant evidence, in relation to construct validity?
Convergent evidence: scores on test undergoing construct validation correlate highly in the predicted direction with scores on older, more established, tests measuring the same (or a similar) construct.
Discriminant evidence: validity coefficient shows little relationship between test scores and other variables with which scores on the test should NOT theoretically be correlated
Apart from the main types of convergent and discriminant evidence, what are 4 other types of evidence for construct validity, and what do they mean?
- Evidence of homogeneity: how uniform a test is in measuring a single concept.
- Evidence of changes with age: some constructs are expected to change over time (e.g. reading rate).
Evidence of pretest/posttest changes: test scores change as a result of some experience between a pretest and a posttest (e.g. therapy).
Evidence from distinct groups: scores on a test vary in predictable way as function of membership to a group (e.g. impulsivity should be higher in substance users)
Out of the different main types of validity, which is most closely and least closely linked to construct validity?
Most linked: criterion validity
Least linked: face validity