(P1) cognitive psychology Flashcards
what is cognition? (simple definition)
another term for thinking
what are the four cognitive processes?
- perception
- attention
- problem solving
- memory
perception
Perception is the ability to capture, process, and actively make sense of the information that our senses receive. It is the cognitive process that makes it possible to interpret our surroundings with the stimuli that we receive throughout sensory organs.
attention
Attention is the cognitive process that involves observing or becoming aware of something; this does not have to be in your peripheral visual field. An example is when we try to recall memories, we have to attend to them to bring them from the long-term to the short-term memory store.
problem-solving
The process of problem solving can be broken down into two main phases: problem representation, in which the problem solver builds a mental representation of the problem situation, and problem solution, in which the problem solver works to produce a solution.
memory
Memory is today defined in psychology as the faculty of encoding, storing, and retrieving information
what are the two basic assumptions of cognitive psychology?
- the ‘real’ world we experience is actually a model in our mind.
- the mind is a bit like a computer.
- cognitive psychology assumes that info is processed in the brain (called information processing). processing is considered as linear, meaning it flows through the brain in a way that seems logical.
give an overview of the multi-store model of memory
The multi-store model is an explanation of how our memory works. It claims that our memory has three separate structures, called sensory store (SS), short term memory (STM) and long term memory (LTM). Information we take in is held very briefly in SS. If we pay attention to it, some information is then moved to STM, which is where we hold the information we are currently using. Some of this information can be moved to LTM, but only if we rehearse it (mentally repeat it to ourselves). If information is encoded into LTM, we can use it in future by retrieving it from LTM back into STM.
STM have different capacities and durations, and encode information in different ways. STM can hold about 7 bits of information for about 20 seconds, and relies on acoustic encoding. LTM has an apparently unlimited capacity and duration and relies heavily on semantic encoding, although it can encode info in many ways.
explain the computer analogy in relation to cognitive psychology
The computer gave cognitive psychologists a metaphor, or analogy, to which they could compare human mental processing. The use of the computer as a tool for thinking about how the human mind handles information is known as the computer analogy.
Essentially, a computer codes (i.e., changes) information, stores information, uses information and produces an output (retrieves info).
input -> processing -> output
storage (up/down)
define encoding
(in relation to the MSM)
changing information into a form the memory system can use
- this is registering the info as a memory
- it can be in different forms/modes (e.g. visual, acoustic (sound), tactile (touch) and semantic (meaning)
define storage
(in relation to the MSM)
retaining information for later use
- this is keeping memories after encoding
- it can be in sensory memory store, STM or LTM
define retrieval
(in relation to the MSM)
bring stored information from LTM to STM so it can be used
- this is accessing memories from storage
- it can be recognition or recall. can be reconstructive (not an exact match with what was encoded and stored). lack of retrieval = more likely to forget
define capacity
(in relation to the MSM)
the amount of information a memory structure can use.
define duration
(in relation to the MSM)
the length of time for which a memory structure can retain information.
define sensory store
(in relation to the MSM)
a very short-term store where information is kept before it can be encoded into STM.
define short-term memory
(in relation to the MSM)
the memory store where information is kept whilst it is in current use. It has limited capacity and limited duration.
- capacity: 7 bits of info for about (duration) 20 secs
- relies on acoustic ending
define long-term memory
(in relation to the MSM)
the memory store where all the information we have previously encoded is kept so that it can be used in future if needed.
- capacity/duration: unlimited
- relies heavily on semantic encoding, although it can encode info in many ways
define rehearsal
(in relation to the MSM)
the process of mental repetition
define primacy effect
(in relation to the MSM)
the tendency for people to have better recall of the first few bits of information in a series. It is caused by encoding into LTM.
define recency effect
(in relation to the MSM)
the tendency for people to have better recall of the last few bits of information in a series. It is caused by retention in STM.
(AO3) evaluation of multi-store model
(S) supporting evidence is reliable and credible
a lot of the supporting evidence for the MSM are reliable because they have been repeated and are well controlled; therefore, replicable. for example, Glanzer and Cunitz (1966) carried out a study using word lists. They found that the first words in the list were recalled well, as were the last but the middle words were not remembered well. they claimed that the primacy effect was because those words had been rehearsed and therfore, were accessible in the LTM. the recency effect was because the those words were still in consciousness in STM, so were recalled easily. the middle words were neither well-rehearsed and in LTM nor in consciousness of the STM. this evidence upholds the claims of the MSM through a controlled experiment.
(S) application value
The Multi Store Model of Memory tells us how to improve our memory in some situations. If you are an eyewitness then you need to pay close attention to encode information in STM. You then need to rehearse it. Repeating the information over and over works, but Elaborative Rehearsal is better because it encodes information semantically. For example, students should make mind maps or use colour coding to focus on meaning.
The model may have application to helping people with dementia or brain damage. If patients struggle to rehearse new information, then writing things down and putting labels on things will help. Colour coding buttons on phones or remotes will also help because it brings in Elaborative Rehearsal.
(W) experiments tend to lack ecological validity
experiments used to test the MSM tend to employ artificial tasks (e.g. testing STM using letters or digits). The model is based on lab experiment tasks like the Brown-Peterson technique, these are quite artificial as they often involve meaningless trigrams. in real-life, you use your memory to recall information that is important to you and there are usually consequences if you forget. therefore, the findings from the experiments into the MSM may not be accurate and easily generalisable in real-life because the experiments lack mundane realism. this has a negative impact as the model won’t explain how memory works in real-life situations.
(W) contradictory evidence
finally, although case studies like Clive Wearing have suggested an area of the brain for STM. another case study, Shallice and Warrington (1970) showed that a victim of a motorbike accident was able to add long-term memories even though his short-term memory was damaged. this goes against the MSM, suggesting that the MSM is overly simplistic and does not account for brain abnormalities/complexities.
(W) differences
The Multi Store Model can be compared to Working Memory (Baddeley & Hitch, 1974). Working Memory replaces STM in the model and provides a more detailed explanation of rehearsal and retrieval from LTM. Most psychologists consider Working Memory to be an improvement and a refinement on the (rather simplistic) Multi Store Model.
Reconstructive Memory is a different approach to memory involving schemas. This theory explain why we mis-remember things (false memories), which the Multi Store Model doesn’t explain. However, in Working Memory it is the Central Executive that creates and retrieves schemas to help the slave systems do their jobs. This is another example of Working Memory incorporating and improving on the Multi Store Model.
A different theory of memory is Levels of Processing Framework (Craik & Lockhart, 1972). This theory ignores separate stores altogether. It suggests that encoding a memory is about the “depth” of processing. Semantic encoding is much “deeper” than acoustic or visual encoding, making this information easier to remember. We also have much more capacity when we try to store meaningful things: most people can only store up to 9 numbers or trigrams but they can store up to 20 words. Richard Shiffrin used this idea when he introduced Elaborative Rehearsal to the MSM in 2002.
what is a laboratory research setting + features?
a location designed specifically for conducting research in. Psychological laboratories tend to be kept free of distractions and can be set up to create very specific environments, which gives a high degree of control over variables. They also often contain specialist equipment including computers, apparatus for measuring physiological responses and behaviour (e.g. reaction times). This makes accurate measurements easier to obtain.
what is an experiment + features?
a type of study where the researcher deliberately changes one variable (the independent variable) in a situation whilst keeping all other variables the same. They measure another variable (the dependent variable) to see if the DV changes when the IV is changed. If so, this tells the researcher that the two variables are causally linked. In Baddeley’s study, the IV was whether the words in the list were semantically similar or dissimilar. The DV was the number of errors the pps made when recalling the list.
what is a serial recall task?
(hint: baddeley 1966)
a task in which pps must recall material in the correct order. This is different from a free recall task, where pps may recall material in any order.
what is semantic encoding?
storing information in terms of what it means.
classic study baddeley (1966)
AIM To find out if LTM encodes acoustically (based on sound) or semantically (based on meaning). This is done by giving participants word lists that are similar in the way they sound (acoustic) or their meaning (semantic); if the participants struggle to recall the word order, it suggests LTM is confused by the similarity which means that this is how LTM tends to encode
IV
This lab experiment has several IVs. (1) Acoustically similar word list or acoustically dissimilar; (2) semantically similar word list or semantically dissimilar; (3) performance before 15 minutes “forgetting” delay and performance after.
IVs (1) and (2) are tested using Independent Groups design but IV (3) is tested through Repeated Measures.
DV
Score on a recall test of 10 words; words must be recalled in the correct order (really, this is a test of remembering the word order, not the words themselves)
SAMPLE
Men and women from the Cambridge University subject panel (mostly students); they were volunteers. There were 72 altogether, a mixture of men and women. There were 15-20 in each condition (15 in Acoustically Similar, 16 in Semantically Similar).
PROCEDURE
The participants are split into four groups, according to IV (1) and (2). Each group views a slideshow of a set of 10 words. Each word appears for 3 seconds.
In the Acoustically Similar condition, the participants get a list of words that share a similar sound (man, cab, can, max, etc) but the Control group get words that are all simple one syllable words but they do not sound the same (pit, few, cow, pen, etc).
In the Semantically Similar condition, the words share a similar meaning (great, large, big, huge, etc) but the Control group get words that are unconnected (good, huge, hot, safe, etc).
The participants in all 4 conditions then carry out an “interference test” which involves hearing then writing down 8 numbers three times. Then they recall the words from the slideshow in order.
There are four “trials” and (as you would expect) the participants’ get better each time they do it because the words stay the same. The words themselves are displayed on signs around the room so the participants only have to concentrate on getting the ORDER of the words right, not remembering the words themselves.
After the 4th trial, the participants get a 15 minute break and perform an unrelated interference task. Then they are asked to recall the list again. This fifth and final trial is unexpected. The words themselves are still on display; it is the order of the words the participants have to recall.
RESULTS
Acoustically similar words seem to be confusing at first, but participants soon “catch up” with the Control group and even overtake them, but this isn’t statistically significant. Notice how LTM is not confused by acoustic similarities – scores on the last test are similar to the 4th trial, suggesting no forgetting has taken place.
Picture
Semantically similar words do seem to be confusing and the experimental group lags behind the Control group. In fact, the experimental group never catches up with the Control group and performs worse overall than the Acoustically Similar group above. Very little forgetting takes place, but scores are lower.
CONCLUSIONS
Baddeley concludes that LTM encodes semantically, at least primarily. His earlier experiments suggest STM encodes acoustically.
This is why LTM gets confused when it has to retrieve the order words which are semantically similar: it gets distracted by the semantic similarities and muddles them up. It has no problem retrieving acoustically similar words because LTM pays no attention to how the words sound.
The “slow start” in the Acoustically Similar condition would be because the interference task doesn’t block STM 100% - some of the words linger on in the rehearsal loop. This means in most conditions, the participants’ LTM gets a bit of help from STM. But in the Acoustically Similar condition, STM gets confused by the similar sounds the way that LTM gets confused by similar meanings. It can’t be of much help so this group lags behind the Controls until all the words are encoded in LTM, at which point the two groups finally get similar scores.
(AO3) evaluation of baddeley (1966) study
(S) reliability
the study uses a standardised procedure of set conditions and a word list. this is a strength as it can be replicated and tested for re-test reliability, this consequently affects its validity and means it can be generalisable.
Baddeley improved the reliability of his own study by getting rid of the read-aloud word lists (some participants had hearing difficulties) and replacing them with slides. Everyone saw the same word for the same amount of time (3 seconds).
(S) application value
The main application of this study has been for other Cognitive Psychologists, who have built on Baddeley’s research and investigated LTM in greater depth. Baddeley’s use of interference tasks to control STM has been particularly influential. Baddeley & Hitch built on this research and developed a brand new memory model – Working Memory.
Another application is for your own revision. If LTM encodes semantically, it makes sense to revise using mind maps that use semantic links. However, reading passages out loud over and over (rote learning) is acoustic coding, but LTM doesn’t seem to work this way, so it won’t be as effective.
(W) generalisability
Despite having a large sample of 72 PP’s, there were so many conditions in this study that each group only had 15-20 people in it. That’s not a lot. Only 15 people did the Acoustically Similar condition. An anomaly could make a difference to scores with numbers that small.
The sample was made up of British volunteers. It might be that there is something unusual about the memories of British or the memorable qualities of British words. However this is unlikely. LTM works the same for people from all countries, speaking all languages, so this sample is probably representative.
A volunteer sample might have more people with parrticularly good memories who enjoy doing memory tests - not representative of people in general.
(W) ecological validity
the ecological validity of this study is not good. Recalling lists of words is quite artificial but you sometimes have to do it (a shopping list, for example). Recalling the order of words is completely artificial and doesn’t resemble anything you would use memory to do in the real world.
Baddeley did improve this. For example, he made the 5th “forgetting” trial a surprise that the participants weren’t expecting. This is similar to real life, where you are not usually expecting it when you are asked to recall important information.
who proposed the multi-store model of memory?
atkinson & shiffrin
who proposed the working memory model?
baddeley & hitch, based on Baddeley’s research into memory in the 60s. It arose from Baddeley’s realisation that memory was in fact more complicated than the Multi Store Model made out, in particular the role of Short Term Memory (STM). Baddeley proposes Working Memory as something that carries out the functions of the STM and some of the work of the LTM as well.
overview of the WMM
The working memory model is a theory that replaces the STM part of the multistore model. Case studies showed that STM had more than one element, so Baddeley and Hitch (1974) created the WMM to reflect this. WM in this theory is both a store for the information we are using in the present moment, and an active processor of that information. It’s the part of our mind that we do our conscious, deliberate thinking with.
The WMM has three parts. Two of these are information stores.
1) The phonological loop stores information about sound and speech. It’s our ‘inner ear and inner voice’.
2) The Visuo-spatial sketchpad stores information about vision and location. It’s the ‘mind’s eye’. Each of the PL and the VSS can store a limited amount of information and each is separate from the other.
3) These two ‘slave systems’ are both are controlled by the central executive. The Central Executive can be described as being like a ‘little man’ (homonculus) inside your head, organising your memories.
The CE controls and coordinates WM, deciding which information will be processed, and doing difficult mental work like problem solving, as well as allocating them to the slave systems. The CE can boost the capacity of either PL or VSS if necessary. However, its capacity is still limited, so if WM tries to process or store too much info at once, overload will occur.
- It also has non-specific modality meaning that it can process sight, sound or any of the 5 senses.